Research and Evaluation of the Exeter Health Care Arts Project

Medical Humanities

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 71-78

  Scher, Peter ^a   Senior, Peter ^a  

^a MANCHESTER METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Arts in health care; Environmental quality; Evaluation

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037750155     PISSN: 1468215X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/mh.26.2.71     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Scher P, Senior P. The Exeter evaluation. Manchester: Arts for Health, The Manchester Metropolitan University, 1999.
2. Nightingale F. Notes on nursing. London: Harrison and Sons, 1860.
3. Clouston E, Vidal J. It's the least Van Gogh would expect. The Guardian 1987 Aug 12: 13.
4. Cole A. Art for kids' sake. Nursing Times 1991;87:43-5.
5. Silver RS. Healing arts enjoy a welcome renaissance. The Times 1992 Mar 2: 5.
6. Massey P. Operation Art. The Times Magazine 1993 May 15: 18-19.
7. Senior P, Croall J. Helping to heal: the arts in health care. London: The Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation, 1993: 32.
8. Hathorn K. A picture of the human condition: fine art for healing environments. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Human Centred Design for Health Care Buildings HCHD '97. Trondheim, Norway: SINTEF Unimed, 1999.
9. Comments, Open Days 3rd - 7th April 1991. Manuscripts collected by John Bird, Commissioning Officer and Development Manager, St Mary's Hospital, Newport, Isle of Wight.
10. Graham-Pole J, Holman S, Rockwood Lane MT. Building arts in medicine. In: Kaye C, Blee T, eds. The arts in health care: a palette of possibilities. London: Jessica Kingsley, 1997.
11. Cooper J. What's it worth? Nursing Times 1991;87:34-5.
12. Scher P. Environmental design quality in health care. Manchester: Arts for Health, The Manchester Metropolitan University, 1992.
13. Ulrich RS. View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science 1984;224:420-1.
14. Beauchemin K, Hays P. Dying in the dark: sunshine, gender and outcomes in myocardial infarction. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 1998;91:352-4.
15. Ulrich RS. Natural versus urban scenes, some psychophysiological effects. Environment and Behaviour 1981;13:523-6.
16. Ulrich RS, Simons RF, Losito BD, Fiorito E, Miles MA, Zelson M, et al. Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology 1991; 11:201-30.
17. Ulrich RS, Lunden O. Effects of nature and abstract pictures on patients recovering from open heart surgery. Paper presented at the International Congress of Behavioural Medicine, Uppsala, Sweden, Jun 1990.
18. Scher P. Wythenshawe Hospital design field study. Manchester: Arts for Health, The Manchester Metropolitan University, 1994.
19. Scher P. Patient-focused architecture for health care. Manchester: Arts for Health, The Manchester Metropolitan University, 1996.
20. Phillip R. Towards an evaluation of the effectiveness of the arts in primary health care. Environmental Epidemiology Report no 183. Bristol: Department of Epidemiology and Public Health Medicine, University of Bristol, 1994.
21. Brown L. START: the arts in mental health. See reference 10.
22. Nicoll S. Observations on hospital users use of signs and wayfinding methods. Report to the King's Fund, London, 1977.
23. Philipp R. Evaluating the effectiveness of the arts in health care. See reference 10.
24. Glanville R. How are we doing? - a new role for evaluation studies. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Human Centred Design for Health Care Buildings HCHD '97. Trondheim, Norway: SINTEF Unimed, 1999.
25. Hughes D. The art of hospitals and the science of economics. Paper presented at The Arts In Hospitals Conference, East Kilbride, Scotland, 1991.
26. st Century. Thessaloniki, Greece: University Studio Press, 1999
27. Shaw P. A review of the art in hospitals scheme. Report to the King's Fund and the Public Art Development Trust, Augu1996.
28. Angus J. An enquiry concerning possible methods for evaluating art for health projects. Bath: Community Health UK, 1999.
29. Measuring the arts: practical use of performance measurement in the arts and entertainment sector. Birmingham: The Art Business Ltd, 1991.
30. Tandy V. Visual Arts. Assessing quality: artistic quality in the publicly-funded arts. Manchester: North West Arts Board, 1996.
31. Meyrick J, Sinkler P. An evaluation resource for healthy living centres. London: Health Education Authority, 1999.
32. McKeon E. Arts in health strategy. Tunbridge Wells, Kent: South East Arts, 1999.
33. Matarasso F. Defining values: evaluating arts programmes. The social impact of the arts. Working paper 1. Stroud, Gloucestershire: Comedia, 1996.
34. Philipp R, Baum M, Mawson A, Calman K. Humanities in medicine: beyond the milennium London: The Nuffield Trust, 1999.
35. Philipp R. A user's guide to the practice and benefits of the arts in health care and healthy living London: The Nuffield Trust, 1999.