Can recent innovations in harmonic analysis 'explain' key findings in natural image statistics?

Network: Computation in Neural Systems

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 371-393

  Donoho, David L ^a   Flesia, Ana Georgina ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; STATISTICAL MODEL; VISION;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PHYSIOLOGY; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0037745171     PISSN: 0954898X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0954-898X/12/3/308     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Bell A J and Sejnowski T J 1995 An information-maximization approach to blind separation and blind deconvolution Neural Comput. 7 1129-59
2. Buckheit J and Donoho D 1996 Time frequency tilings which best expose the nonGaussianity of a stochastic process IEEE Symp. Time-Freq. Time-Scale Anal. (Piscataway, NJ: IEEE)
3. Buccigrossi R and Simoncelli E 1999 Image compression via joint statistical characterization in the wavelet domain IEEE Trans. Image Process. 8 1688-701
4. Candès E 1999 Harmonic analysis of neural networks Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal. 6 197-218
5. Candès E 1998 Ridgelets: theory and applications PhD Thesis Department of Statistics, Stanford University
6. Candès E and Donoho D L 1999 Ridgelets: the key to high-dimensional intermittency? Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 357 2495-509
7. Candès E and Donoho D L 2000 Curvelets: a surprisingly effective nonadaptive representation of objects with edges Curve and Surface Fitting: Saint-Malo 1999 ed A Cohen, C Rabut and L L Schumaker (Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press)
8. Candès E J and Donoho D L 2000 Curvelets: optimally sparse representation of objects with edges Technical Report Department of Statistics, Stanford University
9. Comon P 1994 Independent Component Analysis, a new concept? Signal Process. 36 287-314
10. Crouse M, Nowak R and Baraniuk R 1998 Wavelet-based statistical signal processing using hidden Markov models IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 46 886-902
11. Donoho D L 1981 On minimum entropy deconvolution Applied Time Series Analysis vol 2, ed D F Findlay (New York: Academic) pp 565-608
12. Donoho D L 1999 Wedgelets: nearly minimax estimation of edges Ann. Stat. 27 859-97
13. Donoho D L 2000 Orthonormal ridgelets and linear singularities SIAM J. Math Anal. 31 1062-99
14. Donoho D L 1998 Sparse components analysis and optimal atomic decomposition Constructive Approximation 17 353-82
15. Field D J 1987 Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells J. Opt. Soc. Am. 4 2379-94
16. Field D J 1993 Scale-invariance and self-similar 'wavelet' transforms: an analysis of natural scenes and mammalian visual systems Wavelets, Fractals and Fourier Transforms ed M Farge, J Hunt and J C Vassilicos (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
17. Fyfe C and Baddeley R 1995 Finding compact and sparse distributed representations of visual images Network 6 333-44
18. Graham N 1981 The visual system does a crude Fourier analysis of patterns Mathematical Psychology and Psychophysiology SIAM-AMS Proc. vol 13 (Philadelphia. 1980) (Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society) pp 1-16
19. Hancock P, Baddeley R and Smith L 1992 The principal components of natural images Network 2 61-70
20. Harpur G and Prager R W 1996 Development of low entropy coding in a recurrent network Network 7 277-84
21. Huang J and Mumford D 1999 Statistics of natural images and models. Available at: http://www.dam.brown.edu/ people/mumford/Papers/cvpr99Huang.pdf
22. Lewicki M and Olshausen B 1997 Inferring sparse, overcomplete image codes using an efficient coding Framework Proc. NIPS*97 815-21
23. Mallat S 1998 A Wavelet Tour of Signal Processing (New York: Academic)
24. Meyer Y 1993 Review of an introduction to wavelets and ten lectures on wavelets Bull. Am. Math Soc 28 350-60
25. Meyer Y 1993 Wavelets. Algorithms and Applications (Philadelphia: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics)
26. Olshausen B and Field D 1996 Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images Nature 381 607-9
27. Pollen D and Ronner S 1982 Phase relationship between adjacent simple cells in the visual cortex Science 212 1409-11
28. Pollen D and Ronner S 1983 Visual cortical neurons as localized spatial frequency filters IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 13 907-16
29. Portilla J and Simoncelli E 1999 Texture modeling and synthesis using joint statistics of complex wavelet coefficients Proc. IEEE Workshop Statist. Comput. Theories Vision (Fort Collins CO, June 1999)
30. Ruderman D L 1993 The statistics of natural images Network 5 517-48
31. Simoncelli E and Adelson E 1990 Non-separable extensions of quadrature mirror filters to multiple dimensions Proc. IEEE 78 652-64
32. Simoncelli E and Adelson E 1991 Subband transforms Subband Image Coding ed John Woods (Norwell, MA: Kluwer) pp 143-92
33. Stein E 1993 Harmonic Analysis: Real Variable Methods, Orthogonality, and Oscillatory Integrals (Princeton: Princeton University Press)
34. van Hateren J H and van der Schaaf A 1998 Independent component filters of natural images compared with simple cells in the primary visual cortex Proc. R. Soc. B 265 359-66
35. Watson A B The cortex transform: rapid computation of simulated neural images Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process. 39 311-27
36. Watson A B Barlow H B and Robson J G 1983 What does the eye see best? Nature 302 419-22