Experimental analysis of the processes of systems genesis: Expression of the c-fos gene in the chick brain during treatments inducing the development of the species-specific results-of-action accceptor

Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 209-216

  Egorova, O V ^a   Anokhin, K V ^a  

^a P K ANOKHIN INSTITUTE OF NORMAL PHYSIOLOGY   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MESSENGER RNA; PROTEIN C FOS;

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BRAIN DEPTH STIMULATION; BRAIN NERVE CELL; BRAIN REGION; CHICKEN; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; FEMALE; FUNCTION TEST; GENE ACTIVATION; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC MARKER; LEARNING; MALE; MESSENGER RNA SYNTHESIS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOTHER; NEOSTRIATUM; NERVOUS SYSTEM PARAMETERS; NEWBORN; NONHUMAN; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ANIMALS; ANIMALS, NEWBORN; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; BRAIN; CHICK EMBRYO; CHICKENS; DARKNESS; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENES, FOS; IMPRINTING (PSYCHOLOGY); IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; MALE; MOTOR ACTIVITY; NOISE; RNA, MESSENGER; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 0037741870     PISSN: 00970549     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1022186911789     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. A. B. Abramova, Systems expression of the c-fos gene in the chick brain during visual imprinting and training to passive avoidance [in Russian], Author's abstract of thesis for doctorate in biological science, Moscow (1998).
2. P. K. Anokhin, "Key questions in the study of higher nervous activity," in: Questions in Higher Nervous Activity, Nauka, Moscow (1949), p. 9.
3. P. K. Anokhin, "Fundamental questions in the general theory of functional systems," in: Principles of the Systems Organization of Functions [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1973), p. 5.
4. N. A. Bernshtein, The Control of Movements [in Russian], Meditsina, Moscow (1966).
5. E. M. Bogomolova and Yu. A. Kurochkin, "The systems genesis of behavioral acts in animals in natural living conditions," Vestn. Akad. Med. Nauk SSSR, 2, No. 1, 79 (1985).
6. S. N. Khayutin and L. P. Dmitrieva, "Intrasensory and intersensory heterochrony as factors in systems genesis," in: Systems Genesis [in Russian], K. V. Sudakov (ed.), Meditsina, Moscow (1980), p. 229.
7. K. V. Shuleikina, Systems Organization of Food-Related Behavior [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1971).
8. B. V. Shvyrkov, Neurophysiological Studies on the Systems Mechanisms of Behavior [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1978).
9. K. V. Anokhin, R. Mileusnic, I. Y. Shamakina, and S. P. Rose, "Effects of early experience on c-fos gene expression in the chick forebrain," Brain Res., 544, No. 1, 101 (1991).
10. A. Bekoff, "Neuroethological approaches to the study of motor development in chicks: Achivements and challenges," J. Neurobiol., 23, No. 10, 1486 (1992).
11. J. J. Bolhuis, M. H. Jonson, and G. Horn, "Effect of early experience on the development of filial preferences in the domestic chick," Developm. Psychobiol., 18, No. 4, 299 (1985).
12. J. J. Bolhuis, G. G. Zijlstra, A. M. Den Boer-Visser, and E. A. Van Der Zee, "Localized neuronal activation in the zebra finch brain is related to the strength of song learning," Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 97, No. 5, 2282 (2000).
13. P. Bradley, D. C. Davies, and G. Horn, "Connections of the hyperstriatum ventrale of the domestic chick (Gallus domesticus)," J. Anat., 140, No. 4, 577 (1985).
14. M. W. Brown and G. Horn, "Learning-related alterations in the visual responsiveness of neurons in a memory system of the chick brain," Eur. J. Neurosci., 6, No. 9, 1479 (1994).
15. H. T. Cline, E. A. Debski, and M. Constantine-Paton, "N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist disintegrates eye-specific stripes," Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 84, No. 12, 342 (1987).
16. J. I. Dubbeldam, "Birds," in: The Central Nervous System of Vertebrates, Vol. 3, R. Nieuwenhuys, H. J. Donkelaer, and C. Nicholson (eds.), Springer, Berlin (1997), p. 1525.
17. D. L. Duffy, G. E. Bentley, and G. F. Ball, "Does sex or photoperiodic condition influence ZENK induction in response to song in European starlings?" Brain Res., 844, No. 1-2, 78 (1999).
18. K. T. Fujiwara, K. Aschida, H. Nishina, et al., "The chicken c-fos gene: Cloning and nucleotide sequence analysis," J. Virol., 61, No. 12, 4012 (1987).
19. K. Funke, "Somatosensory areas in the telencephalon of the pigeon. II. Spinal pathways and afferent connections," Exptl. Brain Res., 76, No. 3, 620 (1989).
20. G. Horn, Memory, Imprinting, and the Brain, Clarendon Press, Oxford (1985).
21. G. Horn and B. J McCabe, "Predisposition and preference. Effect on imprinting of lesions to the chick brain," Anim. Behav., 32, No. 2, 288 (1984).
22. G. Horn, B. McCabe, and P. P. G. Bateson, "An autoradiographic study of the chick brain after imprinting," Brain Res., 8, No. 2, 361 (1979).
23. I. V. Kaplan, Y. Guo, and G. D. Mower, "Developmental expression of the immediate early gene ERG-1 mirrors the critical period in cat visual cortex," Developm. Brain Res., 90, No. 9, 174 (1995).
24. W. J. Kuenzel and M. Manson, A Stereotaxic Atlas of the Brain of the Chick (Gallus Domesticus), The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, London (1984).
25. R. Luckliter and J. Stoumbos, "Enhanced prenatal auditory experience facilitates species-specific visual responsiveness in bobwhite quial chicks (Colinus virginianus)," J. Comp. Psychol., 44, No. 3-4, 89 (1992).
26. K. Korenz, "The comparative method in studying innate behaviour patterns," Symp. Soc. Exptl. Biol., 4, 221 (1950).
27. M. Lowndes, D. C. Davies, and M. H. Johnson, "Archistriatal lesion-s impair the acquisition of filial preferences during imprinting in domestic chick," Eur. J. Neurosci., 6, No. 8, 1148 (1994).
28. P. Marler, "Inheritance and learning in the development of avian vocalization," in: Acoustic Behaviour of Animals, R. G. Busnel (ed.), Elsevier, Amsterdam (1963), p. 228.
29. B. J. McCabe, G. Horn, and P. P. Bateson, "Effects of restricted lesions on the chick forebrain on the acquisition of filial preferences during imprinting," Brain Res., 205, No. 1, 29 (1981).
30. B. J. McCabe, J. Cipolla-Neto, G. Horn, and P. Bateson, "Amnesic effects of bilateral lesions placed in the hyperstriatum ventrale of the chick after imprinting," Exptl. Brain Res., 48, No. 1, 13 (1982).
31. S. Ribeiro, G. A. Cecchi, M. O. Magnasco, and C. V. Merllo, "Toward a song code: Evidence for a syllabic representation in the canary brain," Neuron, 21, No. 2, 359 (1998).
32. L. Rogers and G. A. Bell, "Different rates of functional development of two visual systems of the chicken revealed by [14C]2-deoxyglucose," Developm. Brain Res., 49, No. 2, 161 (1989).
33. S. P. R. Rose, "How chicks make memories: The cellular cascade from c-fos to dendritic remodelling," Trends Neurosci., 14, No. 9, 390 (1991).
34. I. Schneider and L. Gray, "Rapid development of a sensory attribute in young chickens," Hear. Res., 52, No. 2, 281 (1991).
35. R. Stripling, S. F. Volman, and D. F. Clayton, "Response modulation in the zebra finch neostriatum: Relationship to nuclear gene regulation," J. Neurosci., 17, No. 10, 3883 (1997).
36. N. Tinbergen, "On aims and methods of ethology," Z. Tierphysiol., 20, No. 3, 410 (1963).
37. E. Wallhausser and H. Scheich, "Auditory imprinting leads to differential 2-deoxyglucose uptake and dendritic spine loss in the chick rostral forebrain," Brain Res., 428, No. 1, 29 (1987).