Long-term assessment of psychologic outcomes of orthognathic surgery

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Volumn 61, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 545-552

  Lazaridou Terzoudi, Theodora ^a   Kiyak, H Asuman ^b   Moore, Rod ^a,b   Athanasiou, Athanasios E ^c   Melsen, Birte ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^c ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI   (Greece)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BODY IMAGE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ESTHETICS; FACE DEFORMITY; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INSTRUMENT; LONG TERM CARE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PERCEPTION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; SELF CONCEPT; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT;

EID: 0037739990     PISSN: 02782391     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/joms.2003.50107     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Athanasiou AE, Melsen B, Eriksen J: Concerns, motivation and experience of orthognathic surgery patients: A retrospective study of 152 patients. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 4:47, 1989
2. Adams GR: Physical attractiveness research. Toward a developmental social psychology of beauty. Hum Dev 20:217, 1977
3. Kehle T, Bramble W, Mason E: Teachers' expectations. Ratings of student performance as biased by student characteristics. J Exp Educ 31:54, 1975
4. LaVoie JC, Adams GR: Teacher expectancy and its relation to physical and interpersonal characteristics of the child. Alberta J Educ Res 1:122, 1974
5. Dion KK, Berscheid E, Walster E: What is beautiful is good. J Pers Soc Psychol 24:285, 1972
6. Dion KK: Physical attractiveness and evaluation of children's transgressions. J Pers Soc Psychol 24:207, 1972
7. Dion KK: Young children's stereotyping of facial attractiveness. Dev Psychol 2:183, 1973
8. Landy O, Sigall H: Beauty is talent: Task evaluation as a function of the performer's physical attractiveness. J Pers Psychol 29: 299, 1987
9. Sigall H, Ostrove N: Beautiful but dangerous: Effects of offender attractiveness and nature of the crime on juridic judgement. J Pers Soc Psychol 31:218, 1971
10. Walster E, Aronson V, Abrahams D, et al: Importance of physical attractiveness in dating behaviour. J Pers Soc Psychol 4:508, 1966
11. Byrne D, Ervin C, Lamberth J: Continuity between the experimental study of attraction in real-life and computer dating. J Pers Soc Psychol 16:157, 1970
12. Murstein B: Physical attractiveness and marital choice. J Pers Soc Psychol 22:8, 1972
13. Curran J, Lippold S: The effects of physical attraction and attitude similarity on attraction in dating dyads. J Pers 30:528, 1975
14. Berscheid E, Gangestad S: The social psychological implications of facial physical attractiveness. Clin Plast Surg 9:289, 1982
15. Pertschuk M, Whitaker L: Social and psychological effects of craniofacial deformity and surgical reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 9:297, 1982
16. Hunt O, Hepper P, Johnston C, et al: Professional perceptions of the benefits of orthodontic treatment. Eur J Orthod 3:315, 2001
17. Scott AA, Hatch JP, Rugh JD, et al: Psychosocial predictors of satisfaction among orthognathic surgery patients. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 15:7, 2000
18. Rivera S, Hatch J, Rugh J: Psychosocial factors associated with orthodontic and orthognathic surgical treatment. Semin Orthod 4:259, 2000
19. Hugo B, Becker S, Witt E: Assessment of the combined orthodontic-surgical treatment from the patients' point of view. J Orofac Orthop 57:89, 1996
20. Hatch JP, Rugh JD, Clark GM, et al: Health-related quality of life following orthognathic surgery. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 13:67, 1998
21. Lam T, Kiyak HA, Hohl T, et al: Recreational and social activities of orthognathic surgery patients. Am J Orthod 83:143, 1983
22. Kiyak HA, McNeil RW, West RA, et al: Predicting psychologic responses to orthognathic surgery. J Oral Surg 40:150, 1982
23. Kiyak HA, Hohl T, West RA, et al: Psychological changes in orthognathic surgery patients: A 24 months follow-up. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 42:506, 1984
24. Kiyak A: Cultural and psychologic influences on treatment demand. Semin Orthod 6:242, 2000
25. Lazaridou-Terzoudi T: Long Term Assessment of Psychological Outcome of Orthognathic Surgery. Aarhus, Denmark, Royal Dental College, MSc Thesis, 1996
26. Fitts WH: Manual for the Tennessee Department of Mental Health Self-Concept Scale. Nashville, TN, Tennessee Department of Mental Health, 1965
27. Secord PF, Jourard SM: The appraisal of body cathexis: Body cathexis and the self. J Consult Psychol 17:343, 1953
28. Flanary C: The psychology of appearance and the psychological impact of surgical alteration of the face, in Bell WH (ed): Modern Practice in Orthognathic and Reconstructive Surgery. Philadelphia, PA, Saunders, 1992, pp 2-29
29. Thomas WI, Thomas DS: The Child in America: Behavior and Programs. New York, NY, A.A. Knopf, 1938, p 572
30. Cunningham SJ, Crean SJ, Hunt NP, et al: Preparation, perceptions, and problems: A long-term follow-up study of orthognathic surgery. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 11:41, 1996
31. Pepersack WJ, Chausse JM: Long-term follow-up of the sagittal splitting technique for correction of mandibular prognathism. J Maxillofac Surg 6:117, 1978
32. Coyne R, Woods M, Abrams R: The community and orthodontic care. Part II: Community-perceived importance of correcting various dentofacial anomalies. Part III: Community perception of the importance of orthodontic treatment. Aust Orthod J 15:289, 1999