Perceptions of a fluid consensus: Uniqueness bias, false consensus, false polarization, and pluralistic ignorance in a water conservation crisis

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Volumn 29, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 559-567

  Monin, Benoît ^a   Norton, Michael I ^b  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

False consensus; False polarization; Pluralistic ignorance; Uniqueness bias; Water conservation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BATH; CONSENSUS; COOPERATION; DRINKING; EPIDEMIOLOGY; HUMAN; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; STATISTICS; WATER SUPPLY;

BATHS; BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); CONSENSUS; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; DRINKING; HUMANS; STEREOTYPING; WATER SUPPLY;

EID: 0037731592     PISSN: 01461672     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0146167203029005001     Document Type: Review

References (41)

1. Allison, S. T., Messick, D. M., & Gocthals, G. R. (1989). On being better but not smarter than others: The Muhammad AH effect. Social Cognition, 7, 275-295.
2. Allport, F. H. (1924). Social psychology. Cambridge, MA: Riverside Press.
3. Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
4. Dawes, R. M. (1989). Statistical criteria for establishing a truly false consensus effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1-17.
5. Dawes, R. M., McTavish, J., & Shaklee, H. (1977). Behavior, communication, and assumptions about other people's behavior in a commons dilemma situation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35(1), 1-11.
6. Dawes, R. M., & Mulford, M. (1996). The false consensus effect and overconfidence: Flaws in judgment or flaws in how we study judgment? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65(3), 201-211.
7. Dawes, R. M., Singer, D., & Lemons, F. (1972). An experimental analysis of the contrast effect and its implications for intergroup communication and the indirect assessment of attitude. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2/(3), 281-295.
8. Esguerra, I. V. (1999, September 21). Putting cleanliness first, some students ignore restrictions. Daily Princetonian.
9. Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117-140.
10. Festinger, L., Riecken, H. W., &: Schachter, S. (1956). When prophecy fails: A social and psychological study of a modern group that predicted the destruction on the world. New York: Harper & Row.
11. Fiske, S. T. (1998). Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 357-411). New York: McGraw-Hill.
12. Gilbert, D. T., & Malone, P. S. (1995). The correspondence bias. Psychological Bulletin, 117(1), 21-38.
13. Gilovich, T. (1990). Differential constnial and the false consensus effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 623-634.
14. Gladwell, M. (2000). The tipping point: How little things can make a big difference. Boston: Little, Brown.
15. Goethals, G. R. (1986). Fabricating and ignoring social reality: Self-serving estimates of consensus. InJ. M. Olson, C. P. Herman, &M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Social comparison and relative deprivation: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 4). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16. Goethals, G. R., Messick, D. M., & Allison, S. T. (1991). The uniqueness bias: Studies of constructive social comparison. In J. Suis & T. A. Wills (Eds.), Social comparison: Contemporary theory and research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17. Gross, S. R., & Miller, N. (1997). The "golden section" and bias in perceptions of social consensus. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1(3), 241-271.
18. Hogg, M. A., & Mullin, B. A. (1999). Joining groups to reduce uncertainty: Subjective uncertainty reduction and group identification. In D. Abrams & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Social identity and social cognition (pp. 249-279). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
19. Jones, E. E., & Davis, K. E. (1965). A theory of correspondent inference: From acts to dispositions. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 219-266.
20. Jones, E. E., & Nisbett, R. E. (1976). The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. In J. W. Thibaut, J. T. Spence, & R. C. Carson (Eds.), Contemporary topics in social psychology. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
21. Katz, D., & Allport, F. H. (1931). Students' attitudes: A report of the Syracuse University reaction study. Syracuse, NY: Craftsman.
22. Katz, D., & Braly, K. W. (1933). Racial stereotypes of 100 college students. Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 28, 280-290.
23. Katz, S. (1997). Secular morality. In A. M. Brandt & P. Rozin (Eds.), Morality and health. New York: Routledge.
24. Kelley, H. H. (1972). Causal schemata and the attribution process. In E. E. Jones, D. E. Kanouse, H. H. Kelley, R. E. Nisbett, S. Valins, & B. Weiner (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior (pp. 151-174). Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
25. Keltner, D., & Robinson, R. J. (1996). Extremism, power, and the imagined basis of social conflict. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 5(4), 101-105.
26. Krueger, J. (1998). On the perception of social consensus. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 30). New York: Academic Press.
27. Krueger, J., & Clement, R. W. (1997). Estimates of social consensus by majorities and minorities: The case for social projection. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1(4), 299-313.
28. Kuran, T. (1995). Private truths, public lies: The social consequences of preference falsification. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
29. Latané, B., & Darley, J. M. (1970). The unresponsive bystander: Why doesn 't he help? New York: Appleton Century Crofts.
30. Marks, G., & Miller, N. (1987). Ten years of research on the false-consensus effect: an empirical and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 102(1), 72-90.
31. Miller, D. T., & McFarland, C. (1987). Pluralistic ignorance: When similarity is interpreted as dissimilarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 298-305.
32. Miller, D. T., & McFarland, C. (1991). When social comparison goes awry: The case of pluralistic ignorance. In J. Suis & T. A. Wills (Eds.), Social comparison: Contemporary theory and research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
33. Miller, D. T., Monin, B., & Prentice, D. A. (2000). Pluralistic ignorance and inconsistency between private attitudes and public behaviors. In D. J. Terry & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Attitudes, behavior, and social context: The role of norms and group membership. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
34. Mullen, B., & Goethals, G. R. (1990). Social projection, actual consensus and valence. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 279-282.
35. Mullen, B., & Hu, L. (1988). Social projection as a function of cognitive mechanisms: Two meta-analytic integrations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 333-356.
36. Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1967). The measurement of meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
37. Prentice, D. A., & Miller, D. T. (1996). Pluralistic ignorance and the perpetuation of social norms and unwitting actors. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 28, 161-210.
38. Robinson, R.J., Keltner, D., Ward, A., & Ross, L. (1995). Actual versus assumed differences in construal: "Naive realism" in intergroup perception and conflict. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(3), 404-417.
39. Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 174-221). New York: Academic Press.
40. Ross, L., Greenc, D., & House, P. (1977). The false consensus phenomenon: An attributional bias in self-perception and social-perception processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13(3), 279-301.
41. Suls, J., & Wan, C. K. (1987). In search of the false-uniqueness phenomenon: Fearand estimates of social consensus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(1), 211-217.