Self, friends, and lovers: Structural relations among Beck Depression Inventory scores and perceived mate values

Journal of Affective Disorders

Volumn 75, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 131-148

  Kirsner, Beth R ^a   Figueredo, Aurelio José ^a   Jacobs, W Jake ^a,b  

^a The University of Arizona   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

Beck Depression Inventory; Depression; Friends; Mate value; Sexual partners

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT; ARTICLE; BECK DEPRESSION INVENTORY; FEMALE; GROUP PSYCHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PERCEPTION; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOLOGIC TEST; PSYCHOMETRY; SAMPLING; SCORING SYSTEM; SELF REPORT; SEXUALITY; SOCIAL ADAPTATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 0037716597     PISSN: 01650327     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0165-0327(02)00048-4     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Alloy L.B., Abramson L.Y. Judgement of contingency in depressed and non-depressed students: sadder but wiser? J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 108:1979;441-485.
2. Alloy L.B., Abramson L.Y. Depressive realism: four theoretical perspectives. Alloy L.B. Cognitive Processes in Depression. 1988;223-265 Guilford, New York.
3. Beck A.T. Depression: Clinical, Experimental, and Theoretical Aspects. 1967;Harper and Row, New York.
4. Beck A.T. BDI-II. 1996;The Psychological Corporation, San Antonio, TX.
5. Beck A.T., Ward C.H., Mendelsohn M., Mock J., Erbaugh J. An inventory for measuring depression. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry. 4:1961;561-571.
6. Beck A.T., Steer R.A., Garbin M.G. Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: 25 years of evaluation. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 8:1988;77-100.
7. Bentler P.M. Fit indices, Lagrange multipliers, constraint changes, and incomplete data in structural models. Multivariate Behav. Res. 25:1990;163-172.
8. Bentler P.M. EQS: Structural Equations Program Manual. 1995;Multivariate Software, Los Angeles, CA.
9. Bentler P.M., Bonett D.G. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychol. Bull. 88:1980;588-606.
10. Bleske A.L., Buss D.M. Can men and women be just friends? Pers. Relationship. 7:2000;131-151.
11. Bollen, K.A., 1989. Structural equations with latent variables. Wiley, New York.
12. Byrne B.M. Structural Equation Modeling with EQS and EQS/Windows: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. 1994;Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
13. Buss, D.M., 1994. The evolution of desire. Basic Books, New York.
14. Buss D.M., Schmitt D.P. Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychol. Rev. 100:1993;204-232.
15. Burley N.T. The differential allocation hypothesis: an experimental test. Am. Nat. 132:1988;611-628.
16. Cosmides L., Tooby J. Cognitive adaptations for social exchange. Barkow J.H., Cosmides L., Tooby J. The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture. 1992;163-228 Oxford University Press, New York.
17. Ellis B. The Partner-Specific Investment Inventory: an evolutionary approach to individual differences in investment. J. Pers. 66:1998;383-442.
18. Figueredo A.J., McKnight P.E., McKnight K.M., Sidani S. Multivariate modeling of missing data within and across assessment waves. Addiction. 95:(Suppl. 3):2000;S361-S380.
19. Gangestad S.W., Simpson J.A. The evolution of human mating: trade-offs and strategic pluralism. Behav. Brain Sci. 23:2000;573-644.
20. Gorsuch R.L. Factor Analysis. 1983;Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
21. Hu L.T., Bentler P.M. Evaluating model fit. Hoyle R.H. Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications. 1995;76-99 Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
22. Huffman, F., 2001. Where the babes are: Playboy names the top ten colleges with the best-looking girls. Playboy. Retrieved March 24, 2001 from the world wide web: http://www.playboy.com/on-campus/features/topten/ .
23. James L.R., Mulaik S.A., Brett J.M. Causal Analysis: Assumptions, Models, and Data. 1982;Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.
24. Johnston V.S., Franklin M. Is beauty in the eyes of the beholder? Ethnol. Sociobiol. 14:1993;183-199.
25. Kenrick D.T., Groth G.E., Trost M.R., Sadalla E.K. Integrating evolutionary and social exchange perspectives on relationships: effects of gender, self-appraisal, and involvement level on mate selection criteria. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 64:1993;951-969.
26. Merikangas K.R. Assortative mating for psychiatric disorders and psychological traits. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry. 39:1982;1173-1180.
27. Miller G.F. The Mating Mind: How Sexual Choice Shaped the Evolution of Human Nature. 2000;Doubleday, New York.
28. Pérusse D. Cultural and reproductive success in industrial societies: testing the relationship at the proximate and ultimate levels. Behav. Brain Sci. 16:1993;267-322.
29. Rowe D.C., Vazsonyi A.T., Figueredo A.J. Mating effort in adolescence: conditional or alternative strategy? J. Person. Individ. Diff. 23:1997;105-115.
30. SAS Language and Procedures, Version 6. 4th Edition:1996;SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC.
31. SAT I: Reasoning Test. 1998;College Entrance Examination Board, Princeton, NJ.
32. Singh D. Female health, attractiveness, and desirability for relationships: role of breast asymmetry and waist-to-hip ratio. Ethnol. Sociobiol. 16:1995;465-481.
33. Thibaut J., Kelley H.H. The Social Psychology of Groups. 1959;Wiley, New York.
34. Tversky A., Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science. 185:1974;1124-1131.