Preserving directional benefits for new users wearing smaller hearing aids

Hearing Journal

Volumn 55, Issue 10, 2002, Pages 46-52

  Kuk, Francis K ^a   Keenan, Denise M ^a   Nelson, John A ^a  

^a Widex Hearing Aid Company   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUDIOMETRY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIRECTIONAL HEARING; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; ESTHETICS; HEARING AID; HEARING LOSS; HUMAN; MICROPHONE; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SPEECH PERCEPTION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 0037716482     PISSN: 07457472     EISSN: 15425991     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.HJ.0000293845.13775.b2     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Killion M, Schulein R, Christensen L, et al.: Real-world performance of an ITE directional microphone. Hear J 1998;51(4):24-38.
2. Painton S: Objective measure of low frequency amplification reduction in canal hearing aids with adaptive circuitry. JAAA 1993;4:152-156.
3. Ricketts T: Directional hearing aids. Trends Amplif 2001;5(4):139-176.
4. Ludvigsen C, Kuk F: New solutions for age-old hearing aid problems. Hear Rev 2001;8(11):32-36, 55.
5. Chasin M: Improving signal-to-noise ratio with directional microphones. Hear Instr 1994;45(9):31-33.
6. Preves D: Directional microphone use in ITE hearing instruments. Hear Rev 1997;4(7):21-27.