Mechanical architecture and development in Clematis: Implications for canalised evolution of growth forms

New Phytologist

Volumn 158, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 543-559

  Isnard, S ^a   Speck, T ^b   Rowe, N P ^a  

^a UMR AMAP   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Architecture; Biomechanics; Canalised evolution; Clematis; Growth form

Indexed keywords

DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY; EVOLUTION; GROWTH FORM; PLANT ARCHITECTURE;

CLEMATIS; CLEMATIS RECTA; CLEMATIS VITALBA; FLAMMULA; RANUNCULACEAE;

EID: 0037714269     PISSN: 0028646X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00771.x     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Bateman RM. 1994. Evolutionary-developmental change in the growth architecture of fossil rhizomorphic lycopsids: Scenarios constructed on cladistic foundations. Biological Reviews 69: 527-597.
2. Bateman RM. 1999. Architectural radiations cannot be optimally interpreted without morphological and molecular phylogenies. In: Kurmann MH, Hemsley AR, eds. The evolution of plant architecture. Kew, UK: Royal Botanic Gardens, 221-250.
3. Bateman RM, Crane PR, DiMichele WA, Kenrick P, Rowe NP, Speck T, Stein WE. 1998. Early evolution of land plants: Phylogeny, physiology and ecology of the primary terrestrial radiation. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 29: 263-292.
4. Bateman RM, DiMichele WA. 1994. Saltational evolution of form in vascular plants: a neoGoldschmidtian synthesis. In: Ingram DS, Hudson A, eds. Shape and form in plants and fungi. London, UK: Academic Press, 63-102.
5. Böhle U-R, Hilger HH, Martin WF. 1996. Island colonisation and evolution of the insular woody habit in Echium L. (Boraginaceae). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 93: 11740-11745.
6. Civeyrel L, Rowe NP. 2001. Phylogenetic relationships of Secamonoideae based on the plastid gene matK, morphology and biomechanics. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 88: 583-602.
7. Esau K. 1977. Anatomy of seed plants. New York, USA: John Wiley.
8. Fisher B, Ewers FW. 1991. Structural responses to stem injury in vines. In: Putz FE, Holbrook NM, eds. The biology of vines. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 99-124.
9. Funk VA. 1982. Systematics of Montanoa (Asteraceae: Helianthae). Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden 36: 1-135.
10. Funk VA, Brooks DR. 1990. Phylogenetic systematics as the basis of comparative biology. Washington DC, USA: Smithsonian Institution.
11. Gallenmüller F, Müller U, Rowe NP, Speck T. 2001. The Growth form of Croton pullei (Euphorbiaceae) - Functional morphology and biomechanics of a neotropical liana. Plant Biology 3: 50-61.
12. Gartner BL. 1991a. Is the climbing habit of poison oak ecotypic? Functional Ecology 5: 696-704.
13. Gartner BL. 1991b. Structural stability and architecture of vines vs. shrubs of poison oak, Toxicodendron diversilobum. Ecology 1991: 2005-2015.
14. Hoffmann BJ, Chabbert B, Monties B, Speck T. 2000a. Fine-tuning of mechanical properties in two tropical lianas. In: Spatz H-C, Speck T, eds. Plant Biomechanics 2000 - Proceedings of the 3rd International Plant Biomechanics Conference, Freiburg, Badenweiler. Stuttgart, Germany: Thieme-Verlag, 10-18.
15. Hoffmann BJ, Chabbert B, Monties B, Speck T. 2000b. Mechanical properties and chemical cell wall composition of two tropical lianas. In: Wisser A, Nachtigal W, eds. Proceedings of the Workshops in Saarbrücken 1999, BIONA-Report 14. Mainz, Germany: Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur, 10-15.
16. Hoffman B, Chabbert B, Monties B, Speck T. 2003. Mechanical, chemical and X-ray analysis of wood in the two tropical lianas Bauhinia guianense and Condylocarpon guianensis: variations during ontogeny. Planta 217: (In press.)
17. Hoot SB. 1995. Phylogeny of the Ranunculaceae based on preliminary atpB, rbcL and 18S nuclear ribosomal DNA sequence data. Plant Systematics and Evolution supplement 9: 241-251.
18. Hoot SB, Magallon S, Crane PR. 1999. Phylogeny of basal eudicots based on three molecular data sets: atpB, rbcL, and 18S nuclear ribosomal DNA sequences. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 86: 1-32.
19. Isnard S, Rowe NP, Speck T. 2003. Biomechanics, development and growth habit of the mediterranean climber Clematis maritima. Annals of Botany 91: 407-417.
20. Johansson JT. 1995. A revised chloroplast DNA Phylogeny of Ranunculaceae. Plant Systematics and Evolution Supplement 9: 253-261.
21. Johansson JT, Jansen RK. 1993. Chloroplast DNA variation and phylogeny of the Ranunculaceae. Plant Systematics and Evolution 187: 29-49.
22. Judd WS, Cambell CS, Kellog EA, Stevens PF, Donoghue MJ. 2002. Plant systematics aphylogenetic approach. Sunderland, MA, USA: Sinauer Associates.
23. Knox EB, Palmer JD. 1995. Chloroplast DNA variation and the recent radiation of the giant senecios (Asteraceae) on the tall mountains of eastern Africa. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 92: 10349-10353.
24. Köhler L, Speck T, Spatz H-C. 2000. Micromechanics and anatomical changes during early ontogeny of two lianescent Aristolochia species. Planta 210: 691-700.
25. Niklas KJ. 1990. Biomechanics of Psilotum nudum and some early Palaeozoic sporophytes. American Journal of Botany 77: 590-606.
26. Niklas KJ. 1992. Plant biomechanics: an engineering approach to plant form and function. Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago Press.
27. Niklas KJ. 1997. The evolutionary biology of plants. Chicago, IL, USA: The University of Chicago Press.
28. Niklas KJ, Speck T. 2001. Evolutionary trends in safety factors against wind-induced stem failure. American Journal of Botany 88: 1266-1278.
29. Putz FE. 1984. The natural history of lianas on Barro Colorado Island, Panama. Ecology 65: 1713-1724.
30. Putz FE, Holbrook NM. 1991. Biomechanical studies of vines. In: Putz FE, Mooney HA, eds. The biology of vines. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 73-97.
31. Rowe NP, Speck T. 1996. Biomechanical characteristics of the ontogeny and growth habit of the tropical liana Condylocarpon guianense (Apocynaceae). International Journal of Plant Science 157: 406-417.
32. Rowe NP, Speck T. 1997. Biomechanics of Lycopodiella cernua and Huperzia squarrosa: implications for inferring growth habits of fossil small-bodied lycopsids. Mededelingen Nederlands Instituut Voor Toegepaste Geowetenschappen TNO 58: 293-302.
33. Rowe NP, Speck T. 1998. Biomechanics of plant growth forms: The trouble with fossil plants. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 102: 43-62.
34. Rowe NP, Speck T. 2003. Hydraulics and mechanics of plants: novelty, innovation and evolution. In: Poole I, Hemsley AR, eds. The evolution of plant physiology. London, UK: Academie Press.
35. Rowe NP, Speck T, Galtier J. 1993. Biomechanical analysis of a Palaeozoic gymnosperm stem. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 252: 19-28.
36. Spatz H-C, Beismann H, Brüchert F, Emanns A, Speck T. 1997. Biomechanics of the giant reed Arundo donax. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B352: 1-10.
37. Spatz H-C, Köhler L, Speck T. 1998. Biomechanics and functional anatomy of hollow stemmed Sphenopsids. I. Equisetum giganteum. American Journal of Botany 85: 305-314.
38. Speck T. 1991. Changes of the bending mechanics of lianas and self-supporting taxa during ontogeny. In: Natural Structures. Principles, Strategies and models in Architecture and Nature, Proceedings of the II International Symposium Sonderforschungsbereich 230, parr I. Mitteilungen des SFB 230 Heft 6. Stuttgart, Germany: SFB230, 89-95.
39. Speck T. 1994. Bending stability of plant stems: Ontogenetical, ecological, and phylogenetical aspects. Biomimetics 2: 109-128.
40. Speck T, Neinhuis C, Gallenmüller F, Rowe NP. 1997. Trees and shrubs in the mainly lianescent genus. Aristolochia s.1. Secondary evolution of the self-supporting habit? In: Jeronimidis G, Vincent JFV, eds. Plant biomechanics. Reading, UK: University of Reading, 201-208.
41. Speck T, Rowe NP. 1999. A quantitative approach for analytically defining, growth form and habit in living and fossil plants. In: Kurmann MH, Hemsley AR, eds. The evolution of plant architecture. Kew, UK: Royal Botanic Gardens, 447-479.
42. Speck T, Rowe NP, Brüchert F, Haberer W, Gallenmüller F, Spatz H-C. 1996. How plants adjust the 'material properties' of their stems according to differing mechanical constraints during growth: An example of smart design in nature. In: Engin AE, ed. Bioengineering. Proceedings of the 1996 Engineering Systems and Design and Analysis Conference, PD-Vol, 77, Vol. 5. ASME 1996. New York, USA: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 233-241.
43. Speck T, Rowe NP, Civeyrel L, Classen-Bockhoff R, Neinhuis C, Spatz H-C. 2003. The potential of plant biomechanics in functional biology and systematics. In: Stuessy T, ed. Deep morphology: Toward a renaissance of morphology inplant systematics. Königstein, Germany: Koeltz, (In press.)
44. Speck T, Vogellehner D: 1994. Devonische Landpflanzen mit und ohne hypodermales Sterom. Eine biomechanische Analyse mit Überlegungen zur Frühevolution des Leit- und Festigungssystems. Palaeontographica B. 233: 157-227.
45. Vincent JFV. 1990. Structural biomaterials. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press.
46. Walters SM, Alexander, JCM, Brady, A, Brickell, CD, Cullen, J, Green, PS, Heywood, VH, Matthews, VA, Robson, NKB, Yeo, PF, Knees, SG, eds. 1989. The European garden flora. Cambridge, UK: University of Cambridge.