|
Volumn 34, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 609-664
|
Regulating reproductive technologies: panacea or paper tiger?
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ARTICLE;
CANADA;
CRIMINAL LAW;
EMBRYO DISPOSITION;
ETHICS;
EUROPE;
FERTILITY CLINIC SUCCESS RATE AND CERTIFICATION ACT 1992;
GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION;
GERM CELL;
GOVERNMENT;
GOVERNMENT REGULATION;
HUMAN;
INFERTILITY THERAPY;
INFORMED CONSENT;
LEGAL APPROACH;
LEGAL ASPECT;
ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT;
PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT;
STANDARD;
TRANSPLANTATION;
UNITED STATES;
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, IRVINE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH;
FERTILITY CLINIC SUCCESS RATE AND CERTIFICATION ACT 1992;
GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION;
LEGAL APPROACH;
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, IRVINE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH;
CANADA;
CRIMINAL LAW;
EMBRYO DISPOSITION;
EUROPE;
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT;
GERM CELLS;
GOVERNMENT REGULATION;
HUMANS;
INFORMED CONSENT;
OWNERSHIP;
PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT;
REPRODUCTIVE TECHNIQUES, ASSISTED;
STATE GOVERNMENT;
TISSUE AND ORGAN PROCUREMENT;
UNITED STATES;
|
EID: 0037706742
PISSN: 00186694
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (19)
|
References (0)
|