Clinical practice at an advanced level: An introduction

Radiography

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 77-83

  Nightingale, J ^a   Hogg, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SALFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PRACTICE; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HUMAN; MEDICAL LITERATURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGY; REVIEW; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 0037696250     PISSN: 10788174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1078-8174(03)00005-1     Document Type: Review

References (31)

1. Holmes K, Hogg P. The interpretation of nuclear medicine data by non-medical health care professionals: developments in the United Kingdom. J Radiogr Diagn Imaging 2000; 3(2): 77-85.
2. Huggett SM, McClellan M. Opportunities and limitations in role development, British Nuclear Medicine Society Spring Meeting. Nucl Med Commun 1996; 17(4): 269.
3. Hay S. Skill mix in diagnostic imaging. J Diagn Radiogr Imaging 1998; 1: 45-54.
4. Price R. Radiographer reporting: origins, demise and revivaJ of plain film reporting. Radiography 2002; 7: 105-17.
5. Patterson A. Role Development - Towards 2000. London: College of Radiographers, 1995.
6. Department of Health. A Health Service for all the Talents - Developing the NHS Workforce, 2000 http://www.doh.gov.uK/wfprconsult/execsum.htm
7. Hogg P. Advanced Practice in Medical Imaging: The Great Britain Experience. Birmingham/Alabama: American Society of Radiologic Technologists, 2002, Invited review.
8. The College of Radiographers. Role Development in Radiography. London: College of Radiographers, 1996.
9. Royal College of Radiologists/College of Radiographers. Inter-Professional Roles and Responsibilities in a Radiology. London: Royal College of Radiologists/College of Radiographers, 1998.
10. General Medical Council. Good Medical Practice. Paragraph, 28, 1995.
11. General Medical Council. Good Medical Practice, Paragraph 40, 1995.
12. Department of Health. Ionising Radiation (Medical Exposure) Regulations The Stationary Office, London, 2000.
13. The Royal College of Radiologists. Clinical Radiology: A Workforce in Crisis, BFCR (02) 01. London: Royal College of Radiologists, 2002.
14. Radiology Benchmarking Study (Radiology Feedback Report). London: Clinical Benchmarking Company/Newchurch Limited, 2001.
15. Department of Health. The National Health Service Cancer Plan. London: Department of Health, 2000, http://www.doh.gov.uk/cancer/cancerplan.htm
16. Radiology. Audit Commission, July 2002 http://www.audit-commission.gov.uk/reports/AC-REPORTasp?CatID=& ProdlD=AB95E11A-A6CI-4335-9482-9618441,DB347&SectionlD=sect1#.
17. Bates JA, Conlon RM, Irving HC. An audit of the role of the sonographer in non-obstetric ultrasound. Clin Radiol 1994; 49: 617-20.
18. Law RL, Longstaff AJ, Slack N. A retrospective audit on the accuracy of barium enema examinations performed by radiographers. Clin Radiol 1999; 54(2): 80-4, Discussion 83-4.
19. Bewell J, Chapman AH. Radiographer-performed barium enemas - results of a survey to assess progress. Radiography 1996; 2: 199-205.
20. Pauli R, Hammond S, Cooke J, Ansell J. Radiographers as film readers in screening mammography: an assessment of competence under test and screening conditions. Br J Radiol 1996; 69: 10-4.
21. Robinson PJA, Culpan G, Wiggins M. Interpretation of selected accident and emergency radiographic examinations by radiographers: a review of 1100 cases. Br J Radiol 1999; 72: 546-51.
22. Cassidy S, Eyres RD, Thomas NB et al. A comparative study of the reporting accuracy of clinical radiographers and radiology registrars. Radiology 1999; 99.
23. Brearley S, Scally AJ, Thomas NB. Methodological standards in radiographer plain film reading performance studies, Review article. Br J Radiol 2002; 75: 107-13.
24. Markus JB, Somer S, O'Malley BP et al. Double contrast barium enema studies: effect of multiple reading on perception error. Radiology 1990; 175: 155-6.
25. Leslie A, Virjee JP. Detection of colorectal carcinoma on double contrast barium enema when double reporting is routinely performed: an audit of current practice. Clin Radiol 2002; 57(3): 184-7.
26. Royal College of Radiologists. Advice on Delegation in Departments of Clinical Radiology. London: Royal College of Radiologists, 1996.
27. McKenzie GA, Mathers S, Graham DT, Chesson RA. An investigation of radiographer-performed barium enemas. Radiography 1998; 4: 17-22.
28. O'Connor G, Butler G. Aspects of patient care during barium enema identified as potential factors for audit. Radiography 1999; 5: 15-22.
29. Swinburne K. Pattern recognition for radiographers. Lancet 1971; 1: 589-90.
30. Nightingale J, Hogg P. Gastro-Intestinal Imaging for Radiographers: Current Practice and Future Potential, Synergy, December 2000.
31. Brayley N. The need for radiographer reporting: an accident and emergency department (A + E) perspective, Guest Editorial. Radiography 2000; 6: 227-9.