Ophiostoma quercus or Ophiostoma querci?

Mycotaxon

Volumn 86, Issue , 2003, Pages 211-214

  De Beer, Z W ^a   Glen, H F ^b   Wingfield, B D ^a   Wingfield, M J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA   (South Africa)

^b SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL BIODIVERSITY INSTITUTE   (South Africa)

Author keywords

Nomenclature; Oak decline; Orthography; Species; Specific epithet

Indexed keywords

FUNGI; OPHIOSTOMA; OPHIOSTOMA QUERCUS; QUERCUS;

EID: 0037696004     PISSN: 00934666     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Anonymous. 1990. Oak decline and the status of Ophiostoma spp. on oak in Europe. EPPO Bull. 20: 405-423.
2. Brasier C. M. 2001. Rapid evolution of introduced plant pathogens via interspecific hybridization. BioScience 51: 123-133.
3. Brasier C. M. & Kirk S. A. 1989. European oak decline. Status of O. piceae on hardwoods and conifers. Pp. 47-48 in: Report on Forest Research, London, UK.
4. Brasier C. M. & Kirk S. A. 1993. Sibling species within Ophiostoma piceae. Mycol. Res. 97: 811-816.
5. Brasier C. M. & Stephens T. M. 1993. Temperature-growth responses distinguish the OPC and OPH sibling species within Ophiostoma piceae. Mycol. Res. 97: 1416-1418.
6. Brasier C. M. & Webber J. F. 1990. Status of Ophiostoma piceae on hardwoods and conifers. In: Wingfield, M. J., Seifert, K. A. & Webber, J. F. (eds.). Abstracts from the International Symposium, 21-24 August 1990, Bad Windsheim, West Germany.
7. De Beer Z. W., Wingfield B. D. & Wingfield M. J. 2003. The Ophiostoma piceae complex in the Southern Hemisphere: a phylogenetic study. Mycol. Res. (In Press).
8. De Hoog G. S. & Scheffer R. J. 1984. Ceratocystis versus Ophiostoma: a reappraisal. Mycologia 76: 292-299.
9. Delatour C., Morelet M. & Ménard J.-E. 1994. Ophiostomas et dépérissement des chênes: analyse d'une hypothèse. Rev. For. Fr. 46: 446-452.
10. Farrell R. L., Duncan S. M., Ram A. P., Kay S. J., Hadar E., Hadar Y., Blanchette R. A., Harrington T. C. & McNew, D. 1997. Causes of sapstain in New Zealand. Pp. 25-29 in: Kreber, B. (ed.), Strategies for Improving Protection of Logs and Lumber, Proceedings of Symposium, Rotorua, New Zealand, 21-22 November. FRI Bull. No. 204.
11. Farrell R. L., Hadar E., Kay S. J., Blanchette R. A. & Harrington T. C. 1998. Survey of sapstain organisms in New Zealand and albino anti-sapstain fungi. Pp. 57-62 in: Morrell, J. J. & Davidson, D. J. (eds.), Biology and Prevention of Sapstain, Madison, Wisconsin.
12. Gagné P., Yang D-Q., Hamelin R. C. & Bernier L. 2001. Genetic variability of Canadian populations of the sapstain fungus Ophiostoma piceae. Phytopathology 91: 369-376.
13. Georgévitch P. 1926. Ceratostomella querci n. sp. Compt. Rend. Hebd. Séances Acad. Sci. 183: 759-761.
14. Georgevitch P. 1927. Ceratostomella quercus n. sp. Ein Parasit der slawonischen Eichen. Biol. Generalis 3: 245-252.
15. Greuter W., McNeill, J., Barrie, F. R., Burdet, H. M., Demoulin, V., Filgueiras, T. S., Nicolson, D. H., Silva, P. C., Skog, J. E., Trehane, P., Turland, N. J. & Hawksworth, D. L. (eds.). 2000. International Code of Botanical Nomenclature (Saint Louis Code). Adopted by the Sixteenth International Botanical Congress St. Louis, Missouri, July-August 1999. Regnum Veg. 138: 1-474.
16. Griffin H.D. 1968. The genus Ceratocystis in Ontario. Can. J. Bot. 46: 689-718.
17. Halmschlager E., Messner R., Kowalski T. & Prillinger H. 1994. Differentiation of Ophiostoma piceae and Ophiostoma quercus by morphology and RAPD analysis. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 17: 554-562.
18. Harrington T. C., McNew D., Steimel J., Hofstra D. & Farrell R. 2001. Phylogeny and taxonomy of the Ophiostoma piceae complex and the Dutch elm disease fungi. Mycologia 93: 111-136.
19. Hunt J. 1956. Taxonomy of the genus Ceratocystis. Lloydia 19: 1-58.
20. Hutchison L. J. & Reid J. 1988. Taxonomy of some potential wood-staining fungi from New Zealand 1. Ophiostomataceae. New Zealand J. Bot. 26: 63-81.
21. Kim S. H., Uzunovic A. & Breuil C. 1999. Rapid detection of Ophiostoma piceae and O. quercus in stained wood by PCR. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65: 287-290.
22. Lewis C. T. & Short C. 1879. A Latin Dictionary. Oxford.
23. Melin E. & Nannfeldt J. A. 1934. Researches into the blueing of ground wood-pulp. Svenska Skogsvȧrdsf. Tidskr. 32: 397-616.
24. Moreau C. 1952. Coexistence des formes Thielaviopsis et Graphium chez une souche de Ceratocystis major (van Beyma) nov. comb. Rev. Mycol. (Paris), Suppl. Col. 17: 17-25.
25. Morelet M. 1992. Ophiostoma querci sur chêne en France. Ann. Soc. Sci. Nat. Archéol. Toulon Var 44: 109-112.
26. Okada G., Seifert K. A., Takematsu A., Yamaoka Y., Miyazaki S. & Tubaki K. 1998. A molecular phylogenetic reappraisal of the Graphium complex based on 18S rDNA sequences. Can. J. Bot. 76: 1495-1506.
27. Olchowecki A. & Reid J. 1973. Taxonomy of the genus Ceratocystis in Manitoba. Can. J. Bot. 52: 1675-1711.
28. Pipe N. D., Buck K. W. & Brasier C. M. 1995. Genomic fingerprinting supports the separation of Ophiostoma piceae into two species. Mycol. Res. 99: 1182-1186.
29. Przybyl K. & De Hoog G. S. 1989. On the variability of Ophiostoma piceae. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 55: 177-188.
30. Przybyl K. & Morelet M. 1993. Morphological differences between Ophiostoma piceae and O. querci, and among O. querci isolates. Cryptogamie Mycol. 14: 219-228.
31. Schirp A., Farrell R. L. & Kreber B. 1999. Effect of New Zealand staining fungi on structural wood integrity of radiata pine. Pp. 99-104 in: Kreber, B. (ed.), The 2nd New Zealand Sapstain Symposium, Proceedings of Symposium, Rotorua, New Zealand, 18-19 November, Forest Research Institute Bull. No. 215.
32. Upadhyay H. P. 1981. A monograph of Ceratocystis and Ceratocystiopsis. Athens, GA.
33. Xiao Y., Kreber B. & Breuil C. 1999. Localization of fungal hyphae in wood using immunofluorescence labelling and confocal laser scanning microscopy. Int. Biodeter. Biodegr. 44: 185-190.