Of disciplined minds and disciplined bodies: On becoming an ecologist

Qualitative Sociology

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 459-481

  Roth, Wolff Michael ^a   Michael Bowen, G ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA   (Canada)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Cognition; Embodiment; Enculturation; Fieldwork

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037687252     PISSN: 01620436     EISSN: 15737837     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1012241029874     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Anderson, J. R. (1985). Cognitive psychology aud its implications. San Francisco: Freeman.
2. Bourdieu, P. (1980). Le sens pratique. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit.
3. Bourdieu, P. (1997). Méditationspascaliennes [Pascalian meditations]. Paris: Seuil.
4. Brookhart-Costa, V. (1993). School science as a rite of passage: A new frame for familiar problems. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 649-668.
5. Collins, H. M. (1982). Tacit knowledge and scientific networks. In B. Barnes & D. Edge (Eds.), Science in context: Readings in the sociology of science (pp. 44-64). Cambridge: MIT Press.
6. Dear, P. (1995). Discipline and experience: The mathematical way in the scientific revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7. Delamont, S., & Atkinson, P. (2001). Doctoring uncertainty: Mastering craft knowledge. Social Studies of Science, 31, 87-107.
8. Delamont, S., Atkinson, P., & Parry, O. (2000). The doctoral experience: Success and failure in graduate school. London: Falmer.
9. Finlayson, A. C. (1994). Fishing for truth: A sociological analysis of northern cod stock assessments from 1977-1990. St. John's, Newfoundland: Institute of Social and Economic Research.
10. Forsythe, D. E. (1993). The construction of work in artificial intelligence. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 18, 460-479.
11. Foucault, M. (1975). Surveiller et punir: Naissance de la prison. Paris: Gallimard.
12. Fox-Keller, E. (1983). A feeling for the organism: The life and work of Barbara McClintock. New York: W. H. Freeman.
13. Gadner, J. (1998). Embodying culture: On the socio-cultural influences on the development of cognitive structures. Anthropological contributions to the concept of embodiment. Evolution and Cognition, 4, 70-80.
14. Garfinkel, H., Lynch, M., & Livingston, E. (1981). The work of a discovering science construed with materials from the optically discovered pulsar. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 11, 131-158.
15. Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
16. Gooding, D. (1990). Experiment and the making of meaning: Human agency in scientific observation and experiment. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
17. Jordan, K., & Lynch, M. (1993). The mainstreaming of a molecular biological tool: A case study of a new technique. In G. Button (Ed.), Technology in working order: Studies of work, interaction, and technology (pp. 162-178). London: Routledge.
18. Kingsland, S. E. (1995). Modeling nature: Episodes in the history of population ecology, 2nd edition. Chicago: University of Chicago.
19. Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
20. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Leinhardt, G., Zaslavsky, O., & Stein, M. K. (1990). Functions, graphs, and graphing: Tasks, learning, and teaching. Review of Educational Research, 60, 1-64.
22. Mayr, E. (1996). The autonomy of biology : The position of biology among the sciences. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 71, 97-106.
23. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945). Phénoménologie de la perception. Paris: Gallimard.
24. Pickering, A. (1995). The mangle of practice: Time, agency, and science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25. Ricœur, P. (1990). Soi-même comme un autre. Paris: Seuil.
26. Roth, W.-M. (1999). The evolution of umwelt and communication. Cybernetics & Human Knowing, 6, 5-23.
27. Roth, W.-M., & Bowen, G. M. (1999a). Complexities of graphical representations during lectures: A phenomenological approach. Learning and Instruction, 9, 235-255.
28. Roth, W.-M., & Bowen, G. M. (1999b). Digitizing lizards or the topology of vision in ecological fieldwork. Social Studies of Science, 29, 719-764.
29. Roth, W.-M., & Bowen, G. M. (2001). Professionals read graphs: A semiotic analysis. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32, 159-194.
30. Roth, W.-M., & Bowen, G. M. (In press). "Creative solutions" and "fibbing results": Enculturation in field ecology. Social Studies of Science.
31. Roth, W.-M., Bowen, G. M., & Masciotra, D. (In press). From thing to sign and "natural object": Toward a genetic phenomenology of graph interpretation. Science, Technology, & Human Values.
32. Sharrock, W., & Button, G. (1991). The social actor: Social action in real time. In G. Button (Ed.), Ethnomethodology and the human sciences (pp. 137-175). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33. Tabachneck-Schijf, H. J. M., Leonardo, A. M., & Simon, H. A. (1997). CaMeRa: A computational model for multiple representations. Cognitive Science, 21, 305-350.
34. Taylor, C. (1993). To follow a rule. . .In C. Calhoun, E. LiPuma, & M. Postone (Eds.), Bourdieu: Critical perspectives (pp. 45-60). Cambridge, U.K.: Polity Press.
35. Traweek, S. (1988). Beamtimes and lifetimes: The world of high energy physicists. Cambridge: MIT Press.
36. Turner, V. W. (1979) [1964]. Betwixt and between: The liminal period in rites de passage. In W. A. Lessa & E. Z. Vogt (Eds.), Reader in comparative religion, 4th edition (pp. 234-243). New York: Harper and Row.
37. van Gennep, A. (1960) [1906]. The rites of passage (M. B. Vizedom & G. L. Caffee, Trans.). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
38. van Maanen, J. (1988). Tales from the field: On writing ethnography. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
39. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
40. Wheeler, M. (1996). From robots to Rothko: The bringing forth of worlds. In M. Boden (Ed.), The philosophy of artificial life (pp. 209-236). Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.