Visual development and the acquisition of motion velocity sensitivities

Neural Computation

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 761-781

  Jacobs, Robert A ^a   Dominguez, Melissa ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

^b University of Rochester   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; BAYES THEOREM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PHYSIOLOGY; VISUAL SYSTEM;

ARTIFACTS; BAYES THEOREM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; MOTION PERCEPTION; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); VISUAL PATHWAYS;

EID: 0037686660     PISSN: 08997667     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/08997660360581895     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Adelson, E. H., & Bergen, J. R. (1985). Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 2, 284-299.
2. Ballard, D. H. (1986). Cortical connections and parallel processing: Structure and function. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 9, 67-120.
3. Belew, R. K., McInerney, J., & Schraudolph, N. N. (1991). Evolving networks: Using the genetic algorithm with connectionist learning. In Proceedings of the Second Artificial Life Conference. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
4. Bishop, C. M. (1995). Neural networks for pattern recognition. New York: Oxford University Press.
5. Dominguez, M., & Jacobs, R. A. (in press-a). Does visual development aid visual learning? In P. Quinlan (Ed.), Connectionist models of development. East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press.
6. Dominguez, M., & Jacobs, R. A. (in press-b). Developmental constraints aid the acquisition of binocular disparity sensitivities. Neural Computation, in press.
7. Geman, S., Bienenstock, E., & Doursat, R. (1995). Neural networks and the bias/variance dilemma. Neural Computation, 4, 1-58.
8. Heeger, D. J. (1992). Normalization of cell responses in cat striate cortex. Visual Neuroscience, 9, 181-197.
9. Hinton, G. E. (1981). Shape representation in parallel systems. In A. Drina (Ed.), Proceedings of the Seventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Menlo Park, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
10. Jordan, M. I. (1994). A statistical approach to decision tree modeling. In M. Warmuth (Ed.), Proceedings of the Seventh Annual ACM. Conference on Learning Theory. New York: ACM Press.
11. Jordan, M. I., & Jacobs, R. A. (1994). Hierarchical mixtures of experts and the EM algorithm. Neural Computation, 6, 181-214.
12. Milner, P. M. (1974). A model for visual shape recognition. Psychological Review, 81, 521-535.
13. Newport, E. L. (1990). Maturational constraints on language learning. Cognitive Science, 14, 11-28.
14. Norcia, A., & Tyler, C. (1985). Spatial frequency sweep VEP: Visual acuity during the first year of life. Vision Research, 25, 1399-1408.
15. Nowlan, S. J., & Sejnowski, T. J. (1994). Filter selection model for motion segmentation and velocity integration. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 11, 3177-3200.
16. Ohzawa, I., DeAngelis, G. C., & Freeman, R. D. (1990). Stereoscopic depth discrimination in the visual cortex: Neurons ideally suited as disparity detectors. Science, 249, 1037-1041.
17. Peng, F., Jacobs, R. A., & Tanner, M. A. (1996). Bayesian inference in mixtures-of-experts and hierarchical mixtures-of-experts models with an application to speech recognition. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91, 953-960.
18. Perrone, J. A., & Thiele, A. (2001). Speed skills: Measuring the visual speed analyzing properties of primate MT neurons. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 526-532.
19. Press, W. H., Teukolsky, S. A., Vetterling, W. T., & Flannery, B. P. (1992). Numerical recipes in C: The art of scientific computing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Simoncelli, E. P., & Heeger, D. J. (2001). Representing retinal image speed in visual cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 461-462.
21. Turkewitz, G., & Kenney, P. A. (1982). Limitations on input as a basis for neural organization and perceptual development: A preliminary statement. Developmental Psychobiology, 15, 357-368.
22. Weiss, Y., & Adelson, E. H. (1998). Slow and smooth: A Bayesian theory for the combination of local motion signals in human vision (Center for Biological and Computational Learning Paper No. 158). Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.