Anisotropic damage with the MCR effect coupled to plasticity

International Journal of Engineering Science

Volumn 41, Issue 13-14, 2003, Pages 1535-1551

  Ekh, M ^a   Menzel, A ^b   Runesson, K ^a   Steinmann, P ^b  

^a CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^b Rheinland Pfälzische Technische Universität Kaiserslautern Landau   (Germany)

Author keywords

Anisotropy; Effective configuration; Elasto plastic damage; MCR effect

Indexed keywords

ANISOTROPY; CRACK INITIATION; ELASTOPLASTICITY; KINEMATICS; PLASTIC DEFORMATION; STRAIN; TENSORS;

ELASTO-PLASTIC DAMAGE;

MICROCRACKS;

EID: 0037680716     PISSN: 00207225     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0020-7225(03)00032-6     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Chaboche J.L. Development of continuum mechanics for elastic solids substaining anisotropic and unilateral damage. Int. J. Damage Mech. 2:1993;311-329.
2. Ekh M., Runesson K. Bifurcation results for plasticity coupled to damage with MCR-effect. Int. J. Solids Struct. 37:2000;1975-1996.
3. Hansen N., Schreyer H. Thermodynamically consistent framework for theories of elastoplasticity coupled with damage. Int. J. Solids Struct. 31:1994;359-389.
4. Johansson M., Runesson K. Viscoplasticity with dynamic yield surface coupled to damage. Comput. Mech. 20:1997;53-59.
5. Ju J. On energy-based coupled elastoplastic damage theories: constitutive modeling and computational aspects. Int. J. Solids Struct. 25(7):1989;803-833.
6. Leckie F.A., Onat E.T. Tensorial nature of damage measuring internal variables. Hult J., Lemaitre J. Proc. IUTAM Symp. on Nonlinearities in Structural Analysis. 1981;140-155 Springer-Verlag, Senlis, France.
7. Lemaitre J., Chaboche J.-L. Mechanics of Solid Materials. 1990;Cambridge University Press.
8. Menzel A., Ekh M., Steinmann P., Runesson K. Computational modelling of anisotropic damage coupled to plasticity based on the effective configuration concept. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Engng. 54(10):2002;1409-1430.
9. Menzel A., Steinmann P. A theoretical and computational setting for anisotropic continuum damage mechanics at large strains. Int. J. Solids Struct. 38(52):2001;9505-9523.
10. Menzel A., Steinmann P. On the comparison of two strategies to formulate orthotropic hyperelasticity. J. Elasticity. 62:2001;171-201.
11. Miehe C. Numerical computation of algorithmic (consistent) tangent moduli in large-strain computational inelasticity. Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Engng. 134:1996;223-240.
12. Ortiz M. A constitutive theory for the inelastic behavior of concrete. Mech. Mater. 4:1985;67-93.
13. Perez-Foguet A., Rodriguez-Ferran A., Huerta A. Numerical differentiation for non-trivial consistent tangent matrices: an application to the mrs-lade model. Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Engng. 189:2000;277-296.
14. Sidoroff F. Description of anisotropic damage application to elasticity. Hult J., Lemaitre J. Proc. IUTAM Symp. on Nonlinearities in Structural Analysis. 1981;237-244 Springer-Verlag, Senlis, France.
15. Simo J., Ju J. Stain- and stress-based continuum damage models-I. Formulation. Int. J. Solids Struct. 23:1987;821-840.
16. Steinmann P., Carol I. A framework for geometrically nonlinear continuum damage mechanics. Int. J. Engng. Sci. 36(15):1998;1793-1814.
17. Voyiadjis G.Z., Deliktas B. A coupled anisotropic damage model for the inelastic response of composite materials. Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Engng. 183:2000;159-199.