Computerized decision-support in prescribing I: Better idea of patients' medications means better quality care;Datorn som beslutsstöd vid läkemedelsförskrivning I: Bättre överblick över patientens medicinering ger bättre vårdkvalitet

Lakartidningen

Volumn 100, Issue 15, 2003, Pages 1333-1337

  Gustafsson, Lars L ^a,b,c   Widäng, Kenneth ^c   Hoffmann, Mikael ^c   Andersén Karlsson, Eva ^c,d,e   Elfman, Karin ^f   Johansson, Björn ^c   Johansson, Eva ^c   Larson, Mats ^g  

^a KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^b STOCKHOLM COUNTY COUNCIL   (Sweden)

^c Svenska Läkaresällskapet ^*  (Sweden)

^d STOCKHOLM SÖDER HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^e LÄKSAK   (Sweden)

^f Västra Götalandsregionen   (Sweden)

^g VD   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DRUG;

ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; DECISION MAKING; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; DRUG DOSAGE FORM; DRUG INDUSTRY; DRUG SAFETY; GENETICS; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; MEDICAL INFORMATION; PRESCRIPTION; CLINICAL PRACTICE; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; DRUG INFORMATION; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; MEDICAL RECORD; POLYPHARMACY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; REVIEW; SAFETY; STANDARD;

CLINICAL PHARMACY INFORMATION SYSTEMS; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, CLINICAL; DRUG INFORMATION SERVICES; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS; MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEMS, COMPUTERIZED; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; POLYPHARMACY; PRACTICE GUIDELINES; PRESCRIPTIONS, DRUG; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; SAFETY;

EID: 0037673935     PISSN: 00237205     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Califf RM. The need for a national infrastructure to improve the rational use of therapeutics. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Safety 2002;11(4):319-27.
2. Alván G, Bertilsson L, Dahl ML, Ingelman-Sundberg M, Sjöqvist F. Moving toward genetic profiling in patient care: the scope and rationale of pharmacogenetic/ecogenetic investigation. Drug Metab Dispos 2001;29:580-5.
3. Schiff GD, Rucker TD. Computerized prescribing: building the electronic infrastructure for better medication usage. JAMA 1998;279(13):1024-9.
4. Kohn KT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS, editors. To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington DC: Committee on Quality of Health Care in America, Institute of Medicine, National Academy Press; 1999.
5. Leape LL, Berwick DM, Bates DW. What practices will most improve safety? Evidence-based medicine meets patient safety. JAMA 2002;288(4):501-7.
6. Anonymous. Fostering rapid advances in health care learning from system demonstrations (http://www.nap.edu/books/030908707/html). Institute of Medicine, USA; 2002.
7. Boman K, Ögren JE. Att sätta ut läkemedel - kliniskt viktigt men praktiskt svårt. Läkartidningen 2002;99:3100-2.
8. Teich JM, Merchia PR, Schmiz JL, Kuperman GJ, Spurr CD, Bates DW. Effects of computerized physician order entry on prescribing practices. Arch Intern Med 2000;160(18):2741-7.
9. Cockburn J, Pit S. Prescribing behaviour in clinical practice: patients' expectations and doctors' perceptions of patients' expectations - a questionnaire study. BMJ 1997;315(7107):520-3.
10. Findlay SD. Direct-to-consumer promotion of prescription drugs. Economic implications for patients, payers and providers. Pharmacoeconomics 2001;19(2):109-19.
11. Hanlon JT, Fillenbaum GG, Kuchibhatla M, Artz MB, Boult C, Gross CR, et al. Impact of inappropriate drug use on mortality and functional status in representative community dwelling elders. Med Care 2002;40(2):166-76.
12. McCowan C, Neville RG, Ricketts IW, Warner FC, Hoskins G, Thomas GE. Lessons from a randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate computer decision support software to improve the management of asthma. Med Inform Internet Med 2001;26(3):191-201.
13. Gustafsson L, Eliasson M, Bastholm P, Hadad K, Henriksson K, Jacobsson L, et al. Janus - a computerized system for rational drug treatment and drug research. NLN News 2001;14:4-6.
14. Fastbom J, Schmidt I, Jallow A, Wahlström R, Norman C. Kunskapsöversikt från Socialstyrelsen: Indikatorer för utvärdering av läkemedelsanvändningens kvalité hos äldre [remissversion]. Stockholm: Socialstyrelsen; 2002.
15. Mjörndal T, Boman MD, Hägg S, Bäckström M, Wiholm BE, Wahlin A, et al. Adverse drug reactions as a cause for admissions to a department of internal medicine. Pharmacoepidemiological Drug Safety 2002;11(1):65-72.
16. Sarlov C, Andersen-Karlsson E, von Bahr C. Läkemedelsbiverkningar leder till sjukhusvård för hjärtpatienter. Läkartidningen 2001;98(47):5349-53.
17. Andersén-Karlsson E. Rapport från landstingets arbetsgrupp inom LÄKSAK för medicinsk kravspecifikation för läkemedelslista/databas 2000. www.janusinfo.org 2001.
18. Bates DW, Kuperman G, Teich JM. Computerized physician order entry and quality of care. Qual Manag Health Care 1994;2(4):18-27.
19. Glassman PA, Simon B, Belperio P, Lanto A. Improving recognition of drug interactions: benefits and barriers to using automated drug alerts. Med Care 2002;40(12):1161-71.
20. Walton R, Dovey S, Harvey E, Freemantle N. Computer support for determining drug dose: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 1999;318(7189):984-90.