An analysis of diversity in freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionidae) of the Cuyahoga and Rocky river watersheds (Ohio, USA) based on the 16S rRNA gene

Journal of Great Lakes Research

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 307-316

  Krebs, Robert A ^a   Vlasceanu, Roxana N ^a   Tevesz, Michael J S ^a  

^a CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Conservation; Evolution; Genetics; Population; Unionidae

Indexed keywords

DNA; GENES; LAKES; RIVERS; RNA;

FRESHWATER MUSSELS;

BIODIVERSITY;

CONSERVATION GENETICS; GENETIC VARIATION; LAKE ECOSYSTEM; MOLLUSC; POPULATION GENETICS;

CUYAHOGA RIVER; OHIO; ROCKY RIVER; UNITED STATES;

BIVALVIA; FUSCONAIA; FUSCONAIA FLAVA; INVERTEBRATA; LAMPSILIS; LAMPSILIS RADIATA; LAMPSILIS RADIATA LUTEOLA; LASMIGONA COMPLANATA; LASMIGONA COMPRESSA; LASMIGONA COSTATA; LEPTODEA; LEPTODEA FRAGILIS; MOLLUSCA; POTAMILUS; POTAMILUS ALATUS; PYGANODON; PYGANODON GRANDIS; QUADRULA; QUADRULA QUADRULA; STROPHITUS; STROPHITUS UNDULATUS; TOXOLASMA; TOXOLASMA PARVUS; UNIONIDAE; UTTERBACKIA; UTTERBACKIA IMBECILLIS;

EID: 0037673173     PISSN: 03801330     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0380-1330(03)70436-5     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Boore, J.L. 1999. Animal mitochondrial genomes. Nucleic Acid Res. 27:1767-1780.
2. Canapa, A., Barucca, M., Marinelli, A., and Olmo, E. 2000. Molecular data from the 16S rRNA gene for the phylogeny of Pectinidae (Mollusca: Bivalvia). J. Molec. Evol. 50:93-97.
3. Davis, G.M., and Fuller, S.L.H. 1981. Genetic relationships among recent Unionacea (Bivalvia) of North America. Malacologia 20:217-253.
4. Heard, W.H., and Guckert, R.H. 1971. A re-evaluation of the recent Unionacea (Pelecypoda) of North America. Malacologia 10:333-355.
5. Hillis, D.M., Mable, B.K., and Moritz, C.M. 1996. Applications of molecular systematics. In Molecular Systematics, eds. D.M. Hillis, C.M. Moritz, and B.K. Mable, pp. 535-553, Sunderland, MA: Sinaur.
6. Hoeh, W.R., Stewart, D.T., Sutherland, B.W., and Zouros, E. 1996. Multiple origins of gender-associated mitochondrial DNA lineages in bivalves (Mollusca: Bivalvia). Evolution 50:2276-2286.
7. _, Frazer, K.S., Naranjo-Garcia, E., Black, M.B., Berg, D.J., and Guttman, S.I. 1998. Correlation between mating system and distribution of genetic variation in Utterbackia (Bivalvia: Unionidae). J. Shellfish Res. 17:1383-1393.
8. Huelsenbeck, J.P., and Hillis, D.M. 1993. Success of phylogenetic methods in the 4-taxon case. Syst. Biol. 42:247-264.
9. Krebs, R.A., Griffith, H.M., and Tevesz, M.J.S. 2002. A study of the Unionidae of Tinkers Creek Ohio. Kirtlandia 53:19-25.
10. Ladoukakis, E.D., and Zouros, E. 2001. Direct evidence for homologous recombination in mussel (Mytilus galloprovincialis) mitochondrial DNA. Molec. Biol. Evol. 18:1168-1175.
11. La Rocque, A. 1967. Pleistocene Mollusca of Ohio. Ohio Geological Survey, Bulletin No. 2.
12. Liu, H., Mitton, J.B., and Wu, S. 1996. Paternal mitochondrial DNA differentiation far exceeds maternal mitochondrial DNA and allozyme differentiation in the freshwater mussel, Anodonta grandis grandis. Evolution 50:952-957.
13. Lydeard, C., and Roe, K.J. 1998. Phylogenetic systematics: The missing ingredient in the conservation of freshwater unionid bivalves. Fisheries 23:16-17.
14. _, Mulvey, M., and Davis, G. 1996. Molecular systematics and evolution of reproductive traits of North American freshwater unionacean mussels (Mollusca: Bivalvia) as inferred from 16S rRNA gene sequences. Phil. Trans.Roy. Soc. London B 351:1593-1603.
15. _, Yoder, J.H., Holznagel, W.E., Thompson, F.G., and Hartfield, P. 1998. Phylogenetic utility of the 5′-half of mitochondrial 16S rDNA gene sequences for inferring relationships of Elimia (Cerithioidea: Pleuroceridae). Malacologia 39:183-193.
16. _, Holznagel, W.E., Schnare, M.E., and Gutell, R.R. 2000. Phylogenetic analysis of molluscan mitochondrial LSU rDNA sequences and secondary structures. Mol. Phylo. Evol. 15:83-102.
17. Metcalfe-Smith, J.L., Staton, S.K., Mackie, G.L., and Lane, N.M. 1998. Changes in the biodiversity of freshwater mussels in the Canadian waters of the lower Great Lakes drainage basin over the past 140 years. J. Great Lakes Res. 24:845-858.
18. _, Mackie, G.L., Di Maio, J., and Staton, S.K. 2000. Changes over time in the diversity and distribution of freshwater mussels (Unionidae) in the Grand River, southwestern Ontario. J. Great Lakes Res. 26:445-459.
19. Mitchell, A., Mitter, C., and Regier, J.C. 2000. More taxa or more characters revisited: Combining data from nuclear protein-encoding genes for phylogenetic analyses of Noctuoidea (Insecta: Lepidoptera). Syst. Biol. 49:202-224.
20. Mulvey, M., Lydeard, C., Pyer, D.L., Hicks, M., Brim-Box, J., Williams, J.D., and Butler, R.S. 1997. Conservation genetics of North American freshwater mussels Amblema and Megalonaias. Conserv. Genet. 11:868-878.
21. _, Liu, H.-P., and Kandl, K.L. 1998. Application of molecular genetic markers to conservation of freshwater bivalves. J. Shellfish Res. 17:1395-1405.
22. nd Ed., eds. D.M. Hillis, C. Moritz, B.K. Mable, pp. 205-247, Washington D.C.: Sinauer.
23. Skibinski, D.O.F., Gallagher, C., and Quesada, H. 1999. On the roles of selection, mutation, and drift in the evolution of mitochondrial DNA diversity in British Mytilus edulis (Mytilidae; Mollusca) populations. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 68:195-213.
24. Smith, D.C. 2000. A survey of freshwater molluscs in the Cuyahoga Valley National Recreation Area. M. S. thesis, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, OH.
25. _, Gates, M.A., Krebs, R.A., and Tevesz, M.J.S. 2002. A survey of freshwater mussels (Unionidae) and other molluscs in the Cuyahoga Valley National Park. Ohio Biological Survey, Miscellaneous Contribution No. 8.
26. Stein, B.A., and Flack, S.R. 1997. 1997 species report card: the state of U.S. plants and animals. Arlington, VA: The Nature Conservancy.
27. Stepien, C.A., Hubers, A.N., and Skidmore, J.L. 1999. Diagnostic genetic markers and evolutionary relationships among invasive dreissenoid and corbiculoid bivalves in North America: phylogenetic signal from, mitochondrial 16S rDNA. Mol. Phylo. Evol. 13:31-49.
28. Swofford, D.L. 2002. PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods) Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
29. Tevesz, M.J.S., and Carter, J.G. 1980. Environmental relationships of shell form and structure of Unionacean bivalves. In Skeletal Growth of Aquatic Organisms, D. C. Rhoads and R. A. Lutz (eds), pp. 295-322, Plenum Publ.
30. _, Rundo, L., Krebs, R.A., Redman, B.G., and DuFresne, A.S. 2002. Changes in the freshwater mussel (Bivalvia: Unionidae) fauna of the Cuyahoga River, Ohio, since late prehistory. Kirtlandia 53:13-18.
31. Watters, G.T. 1995. A Guide to the Freshwater Mussels of Ohio, 3rd ed. The Ohio Division of Wildlife. Columbus, Ohio.
32. Williams, J.D., Warren, M.L., Jr., Cummings, K.S., Harris, J.L., and Neeves, R.J. 1993. Conservation status of the freshwater mussels of the United States and Canada. Fisheries 18:6-22.