Effect of humeral osteotomy on joint surface contact in canine elbow joints

American Journal of Veterinary Research

Volumn 64, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 506-511

  Fujita, Yukihiro ^a   Schulz, Kurt S ^a   Mason, David R ^b   Kass, Philip H ^a   Stover, Susan M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

POLY(METHYL METHACRYLATE);

ARTICLE; CADAVER; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOG; ELBOW; FEMALE; FORELIMB; HUMERUS; MALE; MEDICAL PHOTOGRAPHY; NONHUMAN; OSTEOTOMY; RADIOULNAR JOINT; RADIUS; SURFACE PROPERTY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; ULNA; ANIMAL; CLINICAL TRIAL; JOINT; PHYSIOLOGY;

CANIS FAMILIARIS;

ANIMALS; CADAVER; DOGS; FEMALE; FORELIMB; HUMERUS; JOINTS; MALE; OSTEOTOMY;

EID: 0037672808     PISSN: 00029645     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.2003.64.506     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Wind AP. Elbow incongruity and developmental elbow disease in the dog: part I. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1986;22:711-724.
2. Wind AP, Packard ME. Elbow incongruity and developmental elbow disease in the dog: part II. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1986;22:725-730.
3. Read RA, Armstrong SJ, O'Keefe JD, et al. Fragmentation of the medial coronoid process of the ulna in dogs: a study of 109 cases. J Small Anim Pract 1990;31:330-334.
4. Bouck GR, Miller CW, Taves CL. A comparison of surgical and medical treatment of fragmented coronoid process and osteochondritis dessecans of the canine elbow. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1995;8:177-183.
5. Boulay JP. Fragmented medial coronoid process of the ulna in the dog. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1998;28:51-74.
6. Cook JL. Forelimb lameness in the young patient. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2001;31:55-83.
7. Ness MG. Treatment of fragmented coronoid process in young dogs by proximal ulnar osteotomy. J Small Anim Pract 1998:39:15-18.
8. Lewis RH. Development of elbow arthroplasty (canine) clinical trials, in Proceedings. 6th Annu Am Coll Vet Surg Symp 1996;110.
9. Conzemius MG, Aper RL, Hill CM. Evaluation of a canine total-elbow arthroplasty system: a preliminary study in normal dogs. Vet Surg 2001;30:11-20.
10. Schulz KS. Pressure, arthritis, and the canine elbow, in Proceedings. 10th Annu Annu Am Coll Vet Surg Symp 2000;249-253.
11. Coventry MB. Osteotomy about the knee for degenerative and rheumatoid arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1973;55A:23-48.
12. Riegger-Krugh C, Gerhart TN, Powers WR, et al. Tibiofemoral contact pressures in degenerative joint disease. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1998;348:233-245.
13. Giagounidis EM, Sell S. High tibial osteotomy: factors influencing the duration of satisfactory function. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1999;119:445-449.
14. Hutchison CR, Cho B, Wong N, et al. Proximal valgus tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis of the knee. AAOS Inst Cour Lect 1999;48:131-134.
15. Fisher DE. Proximal tibial osteotomy 1970-1995. Iowa Orthop J 1998;18:54-63.
16. Schultz W, Gobel D. Articular cartilage regeneration of the knee joint after proximal tibial valgus osteotomy: a prospective study of different intra- and extra-articular operative techniques. Knee Surg 1999;7:29-36.
17. Preston CA, Schulz KS, Kass PH. In vitro determination of contact areas in the normal elbow joint of dogs. Am J Vet Res 2000; 61:1315-1321.
18. Grondalen J, Grondalen T. Arthrosis in the elbow joint of young rapidly growing dogs V. A pathoanatomical investigation. Nord Vet Med 1981;33:1-16.
19. Preston CA, Schulz KS, Taylor KT, et al. In vitro experimental study of the effect of radial shortening and ulnar osteotomy on contact patterns in the elbow joint of dogs. Am J Vet Res 2001;62: 1548-1556.
20. DeCamp CE, Soutas-Little RW, Hauptman J, et al. Kinematic gait analysis of the trot in healthy Greyhounds. Am J Vet Res 1993;54:627-634.
21. Allen K, DeCamp CE, Braden TD, et al. Kinematic gait analysis of the trot in healthy mixed breed dogs. Vet Comp Orthop Trauma 1994;7:148-153.
22. Muller ME, Allegower M, Schneider R, et al. Manual of internal fixation: techniques recommended by the AO-ASIF group. 3rd ed. New York: Springer-Verlag Inc, 1995.
23. Olson SA, Bay BK, Hamel A. Biomechanics of the hip joint and the effects of fracture of the acetabulum. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1997;339:92-104.
24. Wang CL, Cheng CK, Chen CW, et al. Contact areas and pressure distributions in the subtalar joint. J Biomech 1995;28: 269-279.
25. An KN, Himeno S, Tsumura H, et al. Pressure distribution on articular surfaces: application of joint stability evaluation. J Biomech 1990;23:1013-1020.
26. Riggs CM, DeCamp CE, Soutas-Little RW, et al. Effects of subject velocity on force plate-measured ground reaction forces in healthy Greyhounds at the trot. Am J Vet Res 1993;54:1523-1526.
27. Rumph PF, Lander JE, Kincaid SA, et al. Ground reaction force profiles from force platform gait analyses of clinically normal mesomorphic dogs at the trot. Am J Vet Res 1994;55:756-761.
28. McLaughlin RM, Roush JK. Effects of subject stance time and velocity on ground reaction forces in clinically normal Greyhounds at the trot. Am J Vet Res 1994;55:1666-1671.
29. Eckstein F, Lohe F, Hillebrand S, et al. Morphomechanics of the humero-ulnar joint: I. Joint space width and contact areas as a function of load and flexion angle. Anat Rec 1995;243:318-326.
30. Sharkey NA, Smith TS, Lundmark DC. Freeze clamping musculo-tendinous junctions for in vitro simulation of joint mechanics. J Biomech 1995;28:631-635.
31. Ateshian GA, Kwak SD, Soslowsky LJ. A stereophotogrammetric method for determining in situ contact areas in diarthrodial joint, and a comparison with other methods. J Biomech 1994;27: 111-124.
32. Stormont TJ, An K-N, Morrey BF, et al. Elbow joint contact study; comparison of techniques. J Biomech 1998;18:329-336.