Housing pigs in large social groups: A review of implications for performance and other economic traits

Livestock Production Science

Volumn 82, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 39-51

  Turner, S P ^a   Allcroft, D J ^b   Edwards, S A ^c  

^a SCOTTISH AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^c NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Group size; Health; Immune competence; Performance; Pig

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA; SUS SCROFA;

EID: 0037672578     PISSN: 03016226     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0301-6226(03)00008-3     Document Type: Review

References (54)

1. Barnard, C.J., Behnke, J.M., Sewell, J., 1994. Social behaviour and susceptibility to infection in house mice (Mus musculus) - Effects of group size, aggressive behaviour and status related hormonal responses prior to infection. Parasitology 108, 487-496.
2. Barnett, J.L., Hemsworth, P.H., Winfield, C.G., Hansen, C., 1986. Effects of social environment on welfare status and sexual behaviour of female pigs. 1. Effects of group size. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 16, 249-257.
3. th International Congress of the International Society for Applied Ethology. Research Centre Foulum, Denmark, pp. 23-28.
4. th International Symposium, Bloomington, Minnesota, Volume 2. American Society of Agricultural Engineers, Michigan, USA, pp. 591-598.
5. Broom, D.M., Mendl, M.T., Zanella, A.J., 1995. A comparison of the welfare of sows in different housing conditions. Anim. Sci. 61, 369-385.
6. Brumm, M., 1999. New swine finishing facility concepts. In: Proceedings of the IX Congresso Brasileiro de Veterinários em Suínos. Belo Horizone, Brazil, pp. 131-142.
7. th Biennial Conference of the Australian Pig Science Association, pp. 87-97.
8. Clark, J.R., Bell, R.W., Tribble, L.F., Lennon, A.M., 1985. Effects of composition and density of the group on the performance, behaviour and age at puberty in swine. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 14, 127-135.
9. Combs, G.E., Copelin, J.L., 1980. Influence of pen size and number of pigs per pen on performance of young swine. Research Report AL-1980-3, Florida Agricultural Experiment Station, pp. 1-3.
10. Deguchi, E., Akuzawa, M., 1998. Effects of fighting after grouping on plasma cortisol concentration and lymphocyte blastogenesis of peripheral blood mononuclear cells induced by mitogens in piglets. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 60, 149-153.
11. Ewbank, R., 1976. Social hierarchy in suckling and fattening pigs: A review. Livest. Prod. Sci. 3, 363-372.
12. Gehlbach, G.D., Becket, D.E., Cox, J.L., Harmon, B.G., Jensen, A.H., 1966. Effects of floor space allowance and number per group on performance of growing-finishing swine. J. Anim. Sci. 25, 386-391.
13. Gonyou, H.W., Stricklin, W.R., 1998. Effects of floor area allowance and group size on the productivity of growing/finishing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 76, 1326-1330.
14. Handlin, D.L., Ballington, D.A., Skelley, G.C., Crook, L., Johnston, W.E., 1972. Effect of space restriction and ration on the incidence of stomach ulcers in swine. J. Anim. Sci. 35, 767-771.
15. Hansen, L.L., Hagelso, A.M., Madsen, A., 1982. Behavioural results and performance of bacon pigs fed 'ad libitum' from one or several self-feeders. Appl. Anim. Ethol. 8, 307-333.
16. Heitman, Jr. H., Hahn, L., Kelly, C.F., Bond, T.E., 1961. Space allotment and performance of growing-finishing swine raised in confinement. J. Anim. Sci. 20, 543-546.
17. Held, S.D.E., Turner, R.J., Wootton, R.J., 1993. Social behaviour and immunological correlates in group-housed female laboratory rabbits. In: Nichelmann, M., Wierenga, H.K., Braun, S. (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Congress on Applied Ethology, Berlin, pp. 131-135.
18. Hsia, L.C., Wood-Gush, D.G.M., 1984. Social facilitation in the feeding behaviour of pigs and the effect of rank. Appl. Anim. Ethol. 11, 265-270.
19. Hsia, L.C., Lee, J.H., Liu, H.C., 1988. The effect of group size and feeding space on pig's performance and behaviour under various seasons. In: Unshelm, J., van Putten, G., Zeeb, K., Ekesbo, I. (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Congress on Applied Ethology in Farm Animals, Skara, Sweden, pp. 194-201.
20. Hurst, J.L., Barnard, C.J., Tolladay, U., Nevison, C.M., West, C.D., 1999. Housing and welfare in laboratory rats: effects of cage stocking density and behavioural predictors of welfare. Anim. Behav. 58, 563-586.
21. Hyun, Y., Ellis, M., 2001. Effect of group size and feeder type on growth performance and feeding patterns in growing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 79, 803-810.
22. Jensen, A.H., Becker, D.E., Harmon, B.G., 1966. Management factors and young pig performance. J. Anim. Sci 25, 1273, abstr.
23. Jones, H.W., Pickett, R.A., Kadlec, J.E., Morris, W.H.M., 1969. A comparison of eight vs. twenty vs. forty pigs per pen in partially slotted enclosed houses. Research Progress Report 352. Purdue University, p. 4.
24. Kornegay, E.T., Notter, D.R., 1984. Effects of floor space and number of pigs per pen on performance. Pig News Info. 5, 23-33.
25. Kornegay, E.T., Tinsley, S.E, Bryant, K.L., 1979. Evaluation of rearing systems and feed flavours for pigs weaned at two to three weeks of age. J. Anim. Sci. 48, 999-1006.
26. Mavrogenis, A.P., Robison, O.W., 1976. Factors affecting puberty in swine. J. Anim. Sci. 42, 1251-1255.
27. McConnell, J.C., Waldorf, R.C., Grimes, L.W., 1982. Housing management for early weaned pigs. J. Anim. Sci 55, (Suppl. 1), 19, abstr.
28. McGlone, J.J., Newby, B.E., 1994. Space requirements for finishing pigs in confinement: behaviour and performance while group size and space vary. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 39, 331-338.
29. th International Congress of the International Society for Applied Ethology, Research Centre Foulum, Denmark. p. 162. (abstr.).
30. Møller, F., Dybkæjr, L., Olsen, A., Jensen, K.H., 1998. Gruppe-og stistørrelsens betydning for løsgående, drægtige søer. Ministeriet for Fodevarer, Landbrug og Fiskeri, DJF Report, Number 2, 26 pp.
31. Morgan, C.A., Nielsen, B.L., Lawrence, A.B., Mendl, M.T., 1999. Describing the social environment and its effects on food intake and growth. In: Kyriazakis, I. (ed.), A Quantitative Biology of the Pig. CAB International, Oxon, UK, pp. 108-109.
32. Morrison, S.R., Hintz, H.F., Givens, R.L., 1968. A note on effect of exercise on behaviour and performance of confined swine. Anim. Prod. 10, 341-344.
33. Morrow-Tesch, J.L., McGlone, J.J., Salak-Johnson, J.L., 1994. Heat and social stress effects on pig immune measures. J. Anim. Sci. 72, 2599-2609.
34. Nielsen, B.L., Whittemore, C.T., Lawrence, A.B., 1993. Effect of group size on the feeding behaviour of pigs using a computerised single-space, feeding system. Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Production. Paper 9.
35. Nielsen, N.P., 1989. Etagestier kontra storstier til smågrise. Landsudvalget for Svin. Danske Slagterier, Report 163.
36. Nielsen, N.P., 1992. Flokstørrelse I smågrisestalde. Landsudvalget for Svin. Danske Slagterier, Report 232.
37. Pedersen, J.S., 1990. 16 compared with 48 finishers per pen. Landsudvalget for Svin. Danske Slagterier, Report 182.
38. Penny, P.C., 2000. Effect of modifications to pen design formation on the performance of weaned pigs housed in large group systems. J. Anim. Sci. 78(Suppl. 1), 238 (abstr).
39. Petherick, J.C., 1983. A biological basis for the design of space in livestock housing. In: Baxter, S.H., Baxter, M.R., MacCormack, J.A.C. (Eds.), Farm Animal Housing and Welfare. Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, pp. 103-120.
40. Petherick, J.C., Beattie, A.W., Bodero, D.A.V., 1989. The effect of group size on the performance of growing pigs. Anim. Prod. 49, 497-502.
41. Petley, M.P., Bayley, H.S., 1988. Exercise and postexerise energy expenditure in growing pigs. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 66, 721-730.
42. Randolph, J.H., Cromwell. G.L., Stahly, T.S., Kratzer, D.D., 1981 Effects of group size and space allowance on performance and behavior of swine. J. Anim. Sci. 53, 922-927.
43. Schmolke, S.A., Gonyou, H.W., 2000. Effect of group sizes of 10, 20, 40 and 80 on productivity of grower-finisher pigs, J. Anim. Sci. 78 (Suppl. 2), 38 (abstr.).
44. Simmins, P.H., 1993. Reproductive performance of sows entering stable and dynamic groups after mating. Anim. Prod. 57, 293-298.
45. Spoolder, H.A.M, Edwards, S.A., Corning, S., 1999. Effects of group size and feeder space allowance on welfare in finishing pigs. Anim. Sci. 69, 481-489.
46. th International Symposium, Bloomington, Minnesota, USA. American Society of Agricultural Engineers, pp. 965-971.
47. Turner, S.P., Edwards, S.A., 2003. Housing pigs in large social groups: implications for social organisation. Submitted to Applied Anim. Behav. Science.
48. Turner, S.P., Dahlgren, M., Arey, D.S., Edwards, S.A., (2002). Effect of social group size and initial liveweight on feeder space requirements of growing pigs fed ad libitum. Anim. Sci. 75, 75-83.
49. Turner, S.P., Edwards, S.A., Bland, V.C., 1999. The influence of drinker allocation and group size on the drinking behaviour, welfare and production of growing pigs. Anim. Sci. 68, 617-624.
50. Turner, S.P., Ewen, M., Rooke, J.A., Edwards, S.A., 2000. The effect of space allowance on performance, aggression and immune competence of growing pigs housed on straw deep-litter at different group sizes. Livest. Prod. Sci. 66, 47-55.
51. Vermeer, H.M., Hoofs, A.I.J., 1994. The effect of weaner group size on performance and profitability. Praktijkonderzoek Varkenshouderij, proefverslag nummer P1.118. pp. 5-6.
52. Wolter, B.F., Ellis, M., 2002. Impact of large group sizes on growth performance in pigs in the USA. Pig News Info. 23, 17N-20N.
53. Wolter, B.F., Ellis, M., Curtis, S.E., Augspurger, N.R., Hamilton, D.N., Parr, E.N., Webel, D.M., 2001. Effect of group size on pig performance in a wean-to-finish production system. J. Anim. Sci. 79, 1067-1073.
54. Wolter, B.F., Ellis, M., Curtis, S.E., Parr, E.N., Webel, D.M., 2000. Feeder location did not affect performance of weanling pigs in large groups. J. Anim. Sci. 78, 2784-2789.