Perceived effectiveness of interpersonal persuasion strategies in computer-mediated communication

Computers in Human Behavior

Volumn 19, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 537-552

  Wilson, E Vance ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE   (United States)

Author keywords

Computer mediated communication; Interpersonal communication; Interpersonal influence; Interpersonal persuasion

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; COMPUTERS; FEEDBACK;

COMPUTER-MEDIATED COMMUNICATION;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 0037671335     PISSN: 07475632     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0747-5632(03)00006-2     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Burgoon J.K., Buller D.B., Woodall W.G. Nonverbal communication: the unspoken dialogue. 1994;Greyden Press, Columbus, OH.
2. Citera M. Distributed teamwork. the impact of communication media on influence and decision quality Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 49(9):1998;792-800.
3. Clark R.A., Delia J.G. Topoi and rhetorical competence. The Quarterly Journal of Speech. 65:1979;187-206.
4. Cody M.J., McLaughlin M.L. Perceptions of compliance-gaining situations. a dimensional analysis Communication Monographs. 47:1980;132-148.
5. Cody M.J., McLaughlin M.L., Jordan W.J. A multidimensional scaling of three sets of compliance-gaining strategies. Communication Quarterly. 28(3):1980;34-46.
6. Daft R.L., Lengel R. Organizational information requirements, media richness, and structural design. Management Science. 32(5):1986;554-571.
7. Daly B. The influence of face-to-face versus computer-mediated communication channels on collective induction. Accounting, Management & Information Technologies. 3(1):1993;1-22.
8. Dillard J.P., Burgoon M. Situational influences on the selection of compliance-gaining messages. two tests of the Cody-McLaughlin typology Communication Monographs. 52:1985;289-304.
9. Dillard J.P., Segrin C., Harden J.M. Primary and secondary goals in the production of interpersonal influence messages. Communication Monographs. 56:1989;19-38.
10. Dubrovsky V.J., Kiesler S., Sethna B.N. The equalization phenomenon. status effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision-making groups Human-Computer Interaction. 6:1991;119-146.
11. Falbo T. The multidimensional scaling of power strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 35:1977;537-547.
12. Fallows, E. (2002). Email at work. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Available: http://www.pewinternet.org/reports/toc.asp?Report=79.
13. French J.R.P. Jr., Raven B. The bases of social power. Cartwright D., Zander A. Group dynamics. 1960;607-623 Harper & Row, New York.
14. Gallupe R.B., McKeen J.D. Enhancing computer-mediated communication. an experimental investigation into the use of a group decision support system for face-to-face versus remote meetings Information & Management. 18:1990;1-13.
15. Hill K., Monk A.F. Electronic mail versus printed text. the effects on recipients Interacting with Computers. 13:2000;253-263.
16. Horrigan, J. B., & Rainie, L. (2002a). Getting serious online: as Americans gain experience, they use the Web more at work, write emails with more significant content, perform more online transactions, and pursue more serious activities. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Available: http://www.pewinternet.org/reports/toc.asp?Report=55.
17. Horrigan, J. B., & Rainie, L. (2002b). The broadband difference: how online Americans' behavior changes with high-speed Internet connections at home. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Available: http://www.pewinternet.org/reports/toc.asp?Report=63.
18. Marwell G., Schmitt D.R. Dimensions of compliance-gaining behavior. an empirical analysis Sociometry. 30:1967;350-364.
19. Matheson K., Zanna M.P. Persuasion as a function of self-awareness in computer-mediated communication. Social Behaviour. 4:1989;99-111.
20. McGrath J.E. Groups: interaction and performance. 1984;Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
21. McGrath J.E., Hollingshead A.B. Putting the "group" back in group support systems. some theoretical issues about dynamic processes in groups with technological enhancements Jessup L.M., Valacich J.S. Group support systems: new perspectives. 1993;78-96 Macmillan, New York.
22. Miller G.R., Parks M.R. Communication in dissolving relationships. Duck S.W. Personal relationships 4: dissolving personal relationships. 1982;127-154 Academic Press, New York.
23. Miller G.R., Boster F.J., Roloff M., Seibold D.R. Compliance-gaining message strategies. a typology and some findings concerning effects of situational differences Communication Monographs. 44:1977;37-51.
24. Moore G.C., Benbasat I. Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research. 2(3):1991;192-222.
25. Nelson M.C. The resolution of conflict in joint purchase decisions by husbands and wives. a review and empirical test Houston M.J. Advances in consumer research, Vol. 15. 1988;436-441 Assn. for Consumer Research, Provo, UT.
26. O'Keefe D.J. Persuasion: theory and research. 1990;Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
27. Parks M.R., Floyd K. Making friends in cyberspace. Journal of Communication. 46(1):1996;80-97.
28. Perloff R.M. The dynamics of persuasion. 1993;Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
29. Reardon K.K. Persuasion in practice. 1991;Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
30. Schenck-Hamlin W.J., Wiseman R.L., Georgacarakos G.N. A model of properties of interpersonal compliance-gaining. Communication Quarterly. 30:1982;92-100.
31. Siegel J., Dubrovsky V., Kiesler S., McGuire T.W. Group processes in computer-mediated communication. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes. 37:1986;157-187.
32. Trevino L., Lengel R., Daft R.L. Media symbolism, media richness, and media choice in organizations. a symbolic interactionist perspective Communication Research. 14(5):1987;553-575.
33. Walther J.B. Computer-mediated communication. impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction Communication Research. 23:1996;1-43.
34. Walther J.B. Group and interpersonal effects in international computer-mediated collaboration. Human Communication Research. 23(3):1997;343-369.
35. Walther J.B., Anderson J.F., Park D. Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction. a meta-analysis of social and anti-social communication Communication Research. 21:1994;460-487.
36. Walther J.B., Burgoon J.K. Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction. Human Communication Research. 19(1):1992;50-88.
37. Weisband S. Group discussion and first advocacy effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision making groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 53:1992;352-380.
38. Wilson E.V. Email winners and losers. Communications of the ACM. 45(10):2002;121-126.
39. Wilson E.V., Morrison J.P. Effects of educational context on socialization in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Computer Information Systems. 40(20):1999;86-89.
40. Wilson E.V., Morrison J.P. A measure of task-technology fit for computer-mediated communication. Clarke S., Lehaney B. Human centered methods in information systems: current research and practice. 2000;145-158 Idea Group, Hershey, PA.
41. Wilson E.V., Morrison J.P., Napier A.M. Perceived effectiveness of computer-mediated communications and face-to-face communications in student software development teams. Journal of Computer Information Systems. 38(2):1997;2-7.
42. Wilson E.V., Zigurs I. Interpersonal influence goals and computer-mediated communication. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce. 11(1):2001;59-76.
43. Wiseman R.L., Schenck-Hamlin W. A multidimensional scaling validation of an inductively derived set of compliance-gaining strategies. Communication Monographs. 48:1981;251-270.