Neonatal and maternal outcome in cesarean section at Varaždin county hospital;Ishod majki I novorodenčadi nakon carskog reza u Varaždinskom rodilištu

Gynaecologia et Perinatologia

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 57-62

  Špoljarić, Aleksandra ^a   Jerbić Cecelja, Martina ^a   Gal Geček, Ljiljana ^a   Pitner, Zoran ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Cesarean section; Maternal morbidity and mortality; Neonatal morbidity and mortality

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANEMIA; ARTICLE; BREECH EXTRACTION; CESAREAN SECTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROATIA; DYSTOCIA; DYSTROPHY; ENDOMETRITIS; FEMALE; FETUS DISTRESS; HUMAN; HYPERBILIRUBINEMIA; INTRAPARTUM HEMORRHAGE; LOW BIRTH WEIGHT; LUNG EMBOLISM; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATERNAL HYPERTENSION; MATERNAL MORBIDITY; MATERNAL MORTALITY; NEWBORN; NEWBORN HYPOXIA; NEWBORN INFECTION; NEWBORN MORBIDITY; NEWBORN MORTALITY; PREGNANCY DIABETES MELLITUS; PREMATURITY; WOUND INFECTION;

EID: 0037668854     PISSN: 13300091     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Asakura H, Myers SA. More than one previous cesarean delivery: A 5-year experience with 435 patients. Obstet Gynecol 1995;85:924-9.
2. Banović I, Barišić A, Tadin I et al. Carski rez. Gynaecol Perinatol 1994;3(suppl. 1):51-61.
3. Taffel Sm. Cesarean delivery in the United States, 1990. Vital Health Stat 21, 1994;51:1-24.
4. Eskew PN Jr, Saywell RM Jr, Zollinger TW et al. Trends in the frequency of cesarean delivery. A 21-year experience. J Reprod Med 1994;39:809-17.
5. Gregory KD, Henry OA, Gellens AJ et al. Repeat cesareans: how many are elective? Obstet Gynecol 1994;84:574-8.
6. Legrew Dc Jr, Morgan MA. Decreasing the cesarean section rate in a private hospital: success without mandated clinical changes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;174:184-91.
7. Klein M, Waldhor T, Vutuc D et al. Frequency of cesarean sections in Austria. Gynäkol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch 2000;40: 125-9.
8. Joffe M, Chapple J, Paterson C et al. What is optimal cesarean section rate? An outcome based study of existing variation. J Epidemiol Community Health 1994;48:406-11.
9. Rooney BL, Thompson JE, Schauberger CW et al. Is twelve-percent cesarean section rate at a perinatal center safe? J Perinatol 1996;16:215-9.
10. Dražančić A. Perinatalni mortalitet u republici Hrvatskoj u 2001. godini. Gynaecol Perinatol 2002;11(suppl. 2):1-13.
11. Miller JM Jr. Maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality in cesarean section. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 1988;15: 629-38.
12. Danforth DN. Cesarean section. JAMA 1985;253:811-8.
13. Špoljaric I, Matas M. Carski rez (petnaestogodišnje iskustvo). Jugoslav Ginekol Opstet 1977;17:159-65.
14. Nielsen TF, Olausson PO, Ingemarsson I. The cesarean section rate in Sweden: the end of rise. Birth 1994;21:34-8.
15. Maher CF, Cave DG, Haran MV. Cesarean section rate reduced. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 1994;34:389-92.
16. Roemer VM. Considerations and observations on management of premature labor. Gynäkol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch 1998; 38:131-42.
17. Mallow MH, Onstad L, Wright E. The effect of cesarean delivery on birth outcome in very low birth weight infants. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Neonatal Research Network. Obstet Gynecol 1991;77:498-503.
18. Mallow MH, Rhoads GG, Schramm W et al. Increasing cesarean section rates in very low birth weight infants. Effect on outcome. JAMA 1989;262:1475-8.
19. Smith GC. A population study of birthweight and risk of cesarean section: Scotland 1980-96. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2000; 107:740-4.
20. Roumen FJ, Nijhuis J. Term breech presentation: an indication for cesarean section. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2001;145: 1533-6.
21. Martin MC, Moyen S, Gelfand M. Cesarean section: recent trends. Can J Surg 1982;25:85-91.
22. Herbst A, Thorngren-Jerneck K. Mode on delivery in brecch presentation at term: increased neonatal morbidity with vaginal delivery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2001;80:731-7.
23. Feige A, Krause M, Lenz A. Deciding criteria for vaginal delivery from breech presentation - effect on neonatal early and late morbidity. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol 1997;201:35-41
24. Laros RK Jr, Flanagan TA, Kilpatrick SJ. Management of term breech presentation: a protocol of external cephalic version and selective trial of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995;172: 1916-23.
25. Ismail MA, Nagib N, Ismail T et al. Comparison of vaginal and cesarean delivery for fetuses in breech presentation. J Perinat Med 1999;27:339-51.
26. De Leeuw JP, De Han J, Derom R et al. Indications for cesarean delivery in breech presentation. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1998;79:131-7.
27. Delmiš J, Pfeifer D. Carski rez i stav zatkom. Gynaecol Perinatal 1994;3(suppl. 1):68-71.
28. Shime J, Gare DJ, Andrews J et al. Prolonged pregnancy: surveillance of the fetus and the neonate and the course of labor and delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984;148:547-52.
29. Yeast JD, Jones A, Poskin M. Induction of labor and relationship to cesarean delivery: A review of 7001 consecutive induction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;181:1274.
30. Beck A, Vutuc C. Mortality and fatality in cesarean section. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 1984;44:321-4.
31. Brumfield CG, Hauth JC, Andrews WW. Puerperal infection after cesarean delivery: evaluation of a standardized protocol. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;182:1147-51.
32. Spinnato JA, Yooukilis B, Cook VD et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis at cesarean delivery. J Matern Fetal Med 2000;9:348-50.
33. Noyes N, Berkeley AS, Freedman K and al. Incidence of postpartum endomyometritis following single dose antibiotic prophylaxis with either ampicilin/sulbactam, cefazolin, or cefotetan in high-risk cesarean section patients. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 1998;6:220-3.
34. Alnaes M, Sande HA, Qvigstad E. Infections after cesarean section. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 1993;113:1212-4.
35. Dražančić A. Carski rez u Hrvatskoj. XIX. Perinatalni dani; Zbornik radova; Zagreb 2002. Hrvatsko društvo za perinatalnu medicinu, 2002:103-11.