Asymptotic behavior of the exchange-correlation potentials from the linear-response Sham-Schlüter equation

Journal of Chemical Physics

Volumn 118, Issue 21, 2003, Pages 9504-9518

  Niquet, Y M ^a   Fuchs, M ^a,b   Gonze, X ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

^b FRITZ HABER INSTITUT DER MAX PLANCK GESELLSCHAFT   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION THEORY; ASYMPTOTIC STABILITY; ELECTRONIC STRUCTURE; GROUND STATE; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PERTURBATION TECHNIQUES; PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION;

EXCHANGE CORRELATION POTENTIALS; SECOND APPROXIMATION THEORY; SHAM-SCHLUTER EQUATION;

MOLECULAR DYNAMICS;

EID: 0037665262     PISSN: 00219606     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1063/1.1566739     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. P. Hohenberg and W. Kohn, Phys. Rev. 136, B864 (1964).
2. W. Kohn and L. J. Sham, Phys. Rev. A 140, A1133 (1965).
3. R. G. Parr and W. Yang, Density Functional Theory of Atoms and Molecules (Oxford University Press, New York, 1989).
4. C.-O. Almbladh and U. von Barth, Phys. Rev. B 31, 3231 (1985).
5. C. J. Umrigar and X. Gonze, Phys. Rev. A 50, 3827 (1994).
6. J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996)
7. J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1396 (1997).
8. C. Filippi, X. Gonze, and C. J. Umrigar, in Recent Developments and Applications of Modern Density Functional Theory, edited by J. M. Seminario (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1996).
9. M. E. Casida, in Recent Developments and Applications of Modern Density Functional Theory, edited by J. M. Seminario (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1996).
10. S. J. A. van Gisbergen, F. Kootstra, P. R. T. Schipper, O. V. Gritsenko, J. G. Snijders, and E. J. Baerends, Phys. Rev. A 57, 2556 (1998).
11. A. Savin, C. J. Umrigar, and X. Gonze, Chem. Phys. Lett. 288, 391 (1998).
12. A. I. Al-Sharif, R. Resta, and C. J. Umrigar, Phys. Rev. A 57, 2466 (1998).
13. A. L. Fetter and J. D. Walecka, Quantum Theory of Many-Particle Systems (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1964).
14. L. J. Sham and M. Schlüter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 1888 (1983)
15. L. J. Sham, Phys. Rev. B 32, 3876 (1985).
16. R. T. Sharp and G. K. Horton, Phys. Rev. 30, 317 (1953).
17. J. D. Talman and W. F. Shadwick, Phys. Rev. A 14, 36 (1976).
18. J. B. Krieger, Y. Li, and G. J. Iafrate, Phys. Rev. A 45, 101 (1992).
19. T. Grabo, T. Kreibich, S. Kurth, and E. K. U. Gross, in The Strong Coulomb Correlations and Electronic Structure Calculations: Beyond the LDA, edited by V. Anisimov (Gordon and Breach, Amsterdam, 1999).
20. A. G. Eguiluz, M. Heinrichsmeier, A. Fleszar, and W. Hanke, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 1359 (1992).
21. R. W. Godby, M. Schlüter, and L. J. Sham, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 2415 (1986)
22. R. W. Godby, M. Schlüter, and L. J. Sham, Phys. Rev. B 37, 10159 (1988).
23. A. Görling and M. Levy, Phys. Rev. B 47, 13105 (1993).
24. A. Görling and M. Levy, Phys. Rev. A 50, 196 (1994).
25. D. C. Langreth and J. P. Perdew, Solid State Commun. 17, 1425 (1975)
26. D. C. Langreth and J. P. Perdew, Phys. Rev. B 15, 2884 (1977).
27. Y. M. Niquet, X. Gonze and M. Fuchs (unpublished).
28. L. Hedin and S. Lundqvist, Solid State Phys. 23, 1 (1969).
29. F. Aryasetiawan and O. Gunnarsson, Rep. Prog. Phys. 61, 237 (1998).
30. A. Facco Bonetti, E. Engel, R. N. Schmid, and R. M. Dreizler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 2241 (2001).
31. M. E. Casida, Phys. Rev. A 51, 2005 (1995).
32. σ(r,r′;ω) is spin-diagonal. This is not restrictive as long as we linearize the Sham-Schlüter equation in the framework of the collinear spin-density functional theory.
33. Unless specified, the symbol "Σ" includes both a sum over a discrete spectrum and an integral over a continuum of states, which we do not treat separately for the sake of notational simplicity (as long as the latter does not require special care).
34. G. Baym and L. P. Kadanoff, Phys. Rev. 124, 287 (1961)
35. G. Baym, ibid. 127, 1391 (1962).
36. L. J. Sham and M. Schlüter, Phys. Rev. B 32, 3883 (1985).
37. M. Städele, J. A. Majewski, P. Vogl, and A. Görling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 2089 (1997).
38. P. Nozières, Theory of Interacting Fermi Systems (Benjamin, New-York, 1964).
39. J. M. Luttinger and J. C. Ward, Phys. Rev. 118, 1417 (1960).
40. C.-O. Almbladh, U. von Barth, and R. van Leeuwen, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 13, 535 (1999).
41. Chr. Møller and M. S. Plesset, Phys. Rev. 46, 618 (1934).
42. RPA(ω).
43. P. Nozières and D. Pines, Phys. Rev. 111, 442 (1958).
44. U. von Barth and L. Hedin, J. Phys. C 5, 1629 (1972).
45. J. F. Dobson and J. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2123 (1999).
46. F. Furche, Phys. Rev. B 64, 195120 (2001).
47. M. Fuchs and X. Gonze, Phys. Rev. B 65, 235109 (2002).
48. F. Aryasetiawan, T. Miyake, and K. Terakura, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 166401 (2002).
49. M. Fuchs, K. Burke, Y. M. Niquet, and X. Gonze, Phys. Rev. Lett. (to be published).
50. E. Engel and R. M. Dreizler, J. Comput. Chem. 20, 31 (1999).
51. xc has no poles at the occupied KS energies.
52. snσ(r)'s as defined in Sec. III C.
53. F. Della Sala and A. Görling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 033003 (2002)
54. F. Della Sala and A. Görling, J. Chem. Phys. 116, 5374 (2002).
55. R. Sternheimer, Phys. Rev. 84, 244 (1951).
56. J. C. Inkson, J. Phys. F: Met. Phys. 3, 2143 (1973).
57. (c)(r) have different analytical properties, although their functional forms are similar (see Appendix A and note 54). For the sake of simplicity, we restrict ourselves to the (practically) relevant case of a system with a discrete spectrum (e.g., a finite system with hard-wall or periodic boundary conditions, or a finite basis set implementation of the OEP equation).
58. (b)(r), we put the system in a box of volume Ω with hard-wall or periodic boundary conditions, solve Eq. (75) for the potential then take the limit Ω → ∞ (see Appendix B).
59. T. Kotani, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 10, 9241 (1998).
60. (a)(r)] has nonvanishing integral (due to this Cauchy's principal value). This condition is still satisfied however for the class of functionals defined in Sec. II B.