Information technologies, embodiment and growth

Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control

Volumn 27, Issue 11-12, 2003, Pages 2007-2034

  Boucekkine, Raouf ^a   de la Croix, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Embodied technological progress; Endogenous growth; Information technology; Vintage capital

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037654721     PISSN: 01651889     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0165-1889(02)00114-8     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Atkinson R. Court R. Ward J. The state new economy index 1999 Progressive Policy Institute Washington
2. Bartel A. Lichtenberg F. The comparative advantage of educated workers in implementing new technology Review of Economics and Statistics 69 1987 1-11
3. Boucekkine, R., del Ŕo, F., Licandro, O., 2000. A Schumpeterian Vintage Capital Model: an attempt at synthesis. Discussion paper, IRES-Université Catholique de Louvain.
4. Boucekkine R. de la Croix D. Vailakis Y. Technological shocks and IT revolutions Recherches Economiques de Louvain 68 2002 75-89
5. Galor O. Moav O. Ability biased technological transition, wage inequality and economic growth Quarterly Journal of Economics 115 2000 469-497
6. Gordon R. The Measurement of Durable Goods Prices 1990 University of Chicago Press Chicago
7. Gordon, R., 1999. Has the "New Economy" rendered the productivity slowdown obsolete? Mimeo, Northwestern University.
8. Gordon R. Does the "New Economy" measure up to the great inventions of the past?" Journal of Economic Perspectives 14 2000 49-74
9. Greenwood, J., Jovanovic, B., 1998. Accounting for growth. NBER Working Paper 6647.
10. Greenwood J. Jovanovic B. The IT revolution and the stock market American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 89 1999 116-122
11. Greenwood J. Yorukoglu M. "1974" Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 46 1997 49-95
12. Greenwood J. Hercowitz Z. Krusell P. Long-run implications of investment-specific technological change American Economic Review 87 1997 342-362
13. Griliches Z. Capital skill complementarity Review of Economics and Statistics 51 1969 465-468
14. Grossman G. Helpman E. Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy 1991 MIT Press Cambridge, MA
15. Hulten C. Growth accounting when technical change is embodied in capital American Economic Review 82 1992 964-980
16. Jorgenson D. Stiroh K. Information technology and growth American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 89 1999 109-115
17. Jorgenson D. Stiroh K. Raising the speed limit: US economic growth in the information age Brooking Papers on Economic Activity 1 2000 125-211
18. Jovanovic, B., Rousseau, P., 2000. Accounting for stock market growth: 1885-1998. Mimeo, New York University.
19. Judd K. On the performance of patents Econometrica 53 1985 567-585
20. Juillard, M., 1996. DYNARE, a program for the resolution of nonlinear models with forward-looking variables. Release 2.1. CEPREMAP.
21. Krusell P. Investment-specific R&D and the decline in the relative price of capital Journal of Economic Growth 3 1998 131-141
22. Michel Ph. Nyssen J. On knowledge diffusion, patents lifetime and innovation based endogenous growth Annales d'Economie et de Statistique 49-50, 77-103 1998
23. Rivera-Batiz L. Romer P. Economic integration and endogenous growth Quarterly Journal of Economics 106 1991 531-556
24. Romer P. Endogenous technological change Journal of Political Economy 98 1990 71-102
25. Segerstrom, P., 2000. Intel economics. Mimeo, Stockholm School of Economics, Sweden.
26. Solow R. Investment and technological progress In: Arrow K.J. Karlin S. Suppes P. (Eds.), Mathematical Methods in the Social Sciences 1959 1960 89-104 Stanford University Press Stanford
27. Whelan, K., 2000. Computers, obsolescence, and productivity. Mimeo, Federal Reserve Board, Division of Research and Statistics.