Commodification of human tissue: Implications for feminist an development ethics

Developing World Bioethics

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 55-63

  Dickenson, Donna ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOTECHNOLOGY; DONOR; ECONOMIC ASPECT; EMBRYO; ETHICS; GENDER; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; JUSTICE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; OOCYTE DONOR; PATENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFIT; REVIEW; STEM CELL; STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION; TISSUE; TISSUE DONOR;

EID: 0037642105     PISSN: 14718731     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1471-8847.00035     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. K. Marx. 1973. Grundrisse: Foundations of the Critique of Political Economy. Tr. and with foreword by M. Nicolas. New York. Vintage Books.
2. D. Dickenson. 1997. Property, Women andPolitics. Cambridge. Polity Press; New Brunswick, NJ. Rutgers University Press. D. Dickenson. 2001. Property and women's alienation from their own reproductive labour. Bioethics 2001; 15: 205-217; D. Dickenson. 2002. Who owns embryonic and fetal tissue? In Ethical Issues in Maternal-Fetal Medicine. D. Dickenson, ed. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.
3. D. Dickenson. 1997. Property, Women andPolitics. Cambridge. Polity Press; New Brunswick, NJ. Rutgers University Press. D. Dickenson. 2001. Property and women's alienation from their own reproductive labour. Bioethics 2001; 15: 205-217; D. Dickenson. 2002. Who owns embryonic and fetal tissue? In Ethical Issues in Maternal-Fetal Medicine. D. Dickenson, ed. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.
4. D. Dickenson. 1997. Property, Women andPolitics. Cambridge. Polity Press; New Brunswick, NJ. Rutgers University Press. D. Dickenson. 2001. Property and women's alienation from their own reproductive labour. Bioethics 2001; 15: 205-217; D. Dickenson. 2002. Who owns embryonic and fetal tissue? In Ethical Issues in Maternal-Fetal Medicine. D. Dickenson, ed. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.
5. Medical Research Council. 1999. Report of the MRC Working Group to Develop Operational and Ethical Guidelines for Collections of Human Tissue and Biological Samplesfor Use in Research. Fourth Working Draft. London. MRC.
6. M.J. Radin. 1996. Contested Commodities: The Trouble with Trade in Sex, Children, Body Parts and Other Things. Cambridge, Mass. Harvard University Press.
7. Moore v Regents of the University of California (1990) 51 Cal. 3d 120; R.E. Gold. 1996. Body Parts: Property Rights and the Ownership of Human Biological Materials. Washington, DC. Georgetown University Press.
8. Moore v Regents of the University of California (1990) 51 Cal. 3d 120; R.E. Gold. 1996. Body Parts: Property Rights and the Ownership of Human Biological Materials. Washington, DC. Georgetown University Press.
9. A. Grubb. 'I, me, mine': bodies, parts and property. Medical Law International 1998; 3: 299-313.
10. Nuffield Council on Bioethics. 2000. Stem Cell Therapy: The Ethical Issues, A Discussion Paper. London. Nuffield Council on Bioethics.
11. J. Lunshof. 2000. Counselling, testing and genetic tourism: coming to terms with global genetics. Paper presented at the seventh international workshop of the European Commission TEMPE project (Teaching Ethics: Materials for Practitioner Education), Milan, 3-4 November.
12. Nuffield Council on Bioethics, op. cit. note 7.
13. Nuffield Council on Bioethics, op. cit. note 7; National Bioethics Advisory Commission (US). 1999. The Ethical Use of Human Stem Cells in Research. Rockville, MD. NIH. Medical Research Council, op. cit. note 3.
14. Nuffield Council on Bioethics, op. cit. note 7; National Bioethics Advisory Commission (US). 1999. The Ethical Use of Human Stem Cells in Research. Rockville, MD. NIH. Medical Research Council, op. cit. note 3.
15. Nuffield Council on Bioethics, op. cit. note 7; National Bioethics Advisory Commission (US). 1999. The Ethical Use of Human Stem Cells in Research. Rockville, MD. NIH. Medical Research Council, op. cit. note 3.
16. The Polkinghorne Committee (Committee to Review the Guidance on the Research Use of Fetuses and Fetal Tissue). 1989. Review of the Guidance on the Research Uses of Fetuses and Fetal Material. London. HMSO; Medical Research Council, op. cit.
17. The Polkinghorne Committee (Committee to Review the Guidance on the Research Use of Fetuses and Fetal Tissue). 1989. Review of the Guidance on the Research Uses of Fetuses and Fetal Material. London. HMSO; Medical Research Council, op. cit.
18. R. Titmuss. 1997. The Gift Relationship, 2nd edition (1st edition 1971). London. New Press.
19. A. Capron. 'Good intentions,' Hastings Center Report 1999; 29: 26-27.
20. L. P. Knowles. Property, progeny and patents. Hastings Center Report 1999; 29: 38-40.
21. Radin, op. cit. note 4.
22. D. Dickenson. 2000. Property and women's alienation from their own reproductive labour. Paper presented at the Fifth Congress of the International Association of Bioethics, London, 21 September.
23. Medical Research Council, op. cit. note 3.
24. Marx, op. cit. note 1.
25. Dickenson 1997, op. cit., Dickenson 2001, op. cit., Dickenson 2002, op. cit.
26. Dickenson 1997, op. cit., Dickenson 2001, op. cit., Dickenson 2002, op. cit.
27. Dickenson 1997, op. cit., Dickenson 2001, op. cit., Dickenson 2002, op. cit.