Do attributions change over time when the actor's behavior is hedonically relevant to the perceiver?

Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 143, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 202-208

  Truchot, Didier ^a   Maure, Gwladys ^a   Patte, Sonia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE REIMS CHAMPAGNE ARDENNE   (France)

Author keywords

Attribution for aggression; Attribution theory; Changes in attributions over time; Fundamental attribution error

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGGRESSION; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CONTROL; FRANCE; HUMAN; MIDDLE AGED; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; TIME;

ADULT; AGGRESSION; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; FRANCE; HUMANS; INTERNAL-EXTERNAL CONTROL; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; SOCIAL PERCEPTION; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0037639065     PISSN: 00224545     EISSN: 19401183     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00224540309598440     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Burger, J. M. (1991). Changes in attributions over time: The ephemeral fundamental attribution error. Social Cognition, 9, 182-193.
2. Burger, J. M., & Pavelich, J. L. (1994). Attributions for presidential elections: The situational shift over time. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 15, 359-371.
3. Buss, A. R. (1978). Causes and reasons in attribution theory: A conceptual critique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1311-1321.
4. Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
5. Hewstone, M. (1989). Causal attribution: From cognitive processes to collective beliefs. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
6. Jones, E. E., & Davis, K. E. (1965). From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 219-266). New York: Academic Press.
7. Jones, E. E., & Harris, V. A. (1967). The attribution of attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 3, 1-24.
8. Malle, B. F. (1999). How people explain behavior: A new theoretical framework. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 21-43.
9. Miller, J. G. (1984). Culture and the development of everyday social explanation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 961-978.
10. Nisbett, R. E., & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
11. Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attributions process. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 173-220). New York: Academic Press.
12. Ross, L. D., Amabile, T. M., & Steinmetz, J. L. (1977). Social roles, social control, and biases in social perception processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 485-494.
13. Snyder, M., & Jones, E. E. (1974). Attitude attribution when behavior is constrained. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 585-600.
14. Truchot, D. (1994). Representation et attributions: Une etude de l’aide sociale. [Social representation and attributions: A study of helping in human services]. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales (EHESS), Paris.