Improving AAC Use for Persons with Acquired Neurogenic Disorders: Understanding Human and Engineering Factors

Assistive Technology

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 33-44

  Beukelman, David R ^a,b,c   Ball, Laura J ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c Institute for Rehabilitation Science and Engineering   (United States)

Author keywords

Adults; Assistive technology; Communication

Indexed keywords

AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS; BRAIN INJURY; COMMUNICATION AID; COMMUNICATION DISORDER; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMAN; LEARNING; REVIEW;

AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS; BRAIN INJURIES; COMMUNICATION AIDS FOR DISABLED; COMMUNICATION DISORDERS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMANS; LEARNING;

EID: 0037639046     PISSN: 10400435     EISSN: 19493614     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10400435.2002.10132053     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Badd eley, A., & Wilson, G. (1994).When implicit learn ing fail s: Amnesia and the problems of er rorelimina tion. Neuropsychologia, 3, 53-68.
2. Ball, L., Willis, A., Beukelm an, D., &Pattee, G. (2001). A protocol for identificat ion of early bulba r signs in amyotrophic later al sclerosis. Journal of Neurological Sciences, 191, 4353.
3. Beuk elman, D., & Mirenda, P. (1998). Augmentative and alternativ e communication: Man agement of severe communicat ion dis orders in children and adu lts. Baltimore, MD: Pau l H. Brookes.
4. Beukelman, D., & York ston, K (1977). A communication system for the severe ly dysarthric spea ker with an intact language system. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 42, 265-270.
5. Beukelman, D., Yorkston, K, & Reichle, J. (2000). Augmentati ve and alt ernat ive communication for adul ts with acquired neurologic disorders. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
6. Boden, D., & Bielby, D. (1983). Topical organiza tion in elderly conversa tion. Language and Communication, 6, 73-79.
7. Carte r, C., York ston, K, Strand, E., & Hammen, V. (1996).The effects of semantic and syntactic cont ext on the actua l and esti mate sente nce intelligibility of dysarth ric speakers. In D. Robin, K York st on, & D. Beukelman (Eds.), Recent advances in clinical dysarthria (pp. 67-88). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
8. Cohen, N. (1984). Preserved learning capacity in amnesia: Evidence for mul tiple memory systems. In L. Squire & N. Butter s (Eds.), Neuropsychology of memory (pp. 83-103). New York: Guilford Press.
9. Cohen, N., & Squire, I. (1980). Preserv ed learn ing and ret ention of pat tern-analyzing skill in amnes ia: Dissociation of knowing how and of kn owing that. Science, 210, 101-120.
10. Crow, E., & Enderby, P. (1989).The effects of an alphabet chart on the spea king rate and inte lligibility of speakers with severe dysarthria. In K York ston & D. Beukelm an (Eds.), Recent ad vances in clinical dysarthria (pp. 99-108). Aust in, TX: Pro-ed.
11. DeRuyter, F., & Kenn edy, M. (1991). Augmentati ve communication following traumatic brain injury. In D. Beukelman & K York ston (Eds.), Communication diso rders followi ng traumatic brain injury: Man agement of cognitive, lan guage, and motor impairm ent s (pp, 317-366). Austin, TX: Pro-ed.
12. DeRuyt er, F., & Lafont aine, L. (1987).The non-speaking br ain inj ured: A clinical and demograp hic database report. Augmentative and Alternative Comm unication, 3, 18-25.
13. Dongilli, P. (1994). Semantic context and speech intelligibility. In J. Till, K Yorkston, & D. Beuk elman (Eds.), Motor speech diso rders:Adva nces in assessment and treatment (pp. 175-192). Austin, TX: Pro-ed.
14. Dongilli, P., Hak el, M., & Beukelman, D. (1992). Recovery of functi ona l speech following t raumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitat ion, 7, 91-101.
15. Doyle, M., Kennedy, M., J ausalai tis, R. T., & Phillips, B. (2000). In D. Beukelm an, K Yorkston, & J. Reichle (Eds.), Augmentative and alt ernative communication for adults with acqui red neurologic disorders (pp. 271-304). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
16. En derby, P., & Crow, E. (1990). Long-term recovery patterns of severe dysarthria following head injury. British Journal ofDisorders of Communica tion, 2 7, 159-173.
17. Fox, L., & Sohlberg, M. (2000). Meaningful communication roles. In D. Beukelm an, K Yorkston, & J. Reichle (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication for adults with acquired neurologi c di sorders (pp. 3-24). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
18. Fri ed-Oken, M., Rau, M. T., & Oken, B. S. (2000). In D. Beukelman, K Yorkston, &J. Reichle (Eds.), Augmentative and alt erna ti ve communication for adults with acquired neurologic di sorders (pp. 375-405). Baltimore, MD: Pau l H. Brookes.
19. Garrett, K L., & Kimelman, M. (2000). In D. Beukelman, K Yorkst on, &J. Reichle (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication for adults with acquired neurologic disorders (pp. 339-374). Baltimore, MD: Pau l H. Brookes.
20. Hill, K (2001).Achieving success in AAC:Assessment and intervention. AAC In stitute Press, http://www.aacinstitute. org. Vol. 1, p. 2.
21. Hunkin, N., Squires, E., Parkin, A., & Tidy, J. (1998). Are the benefits of errorles s learning dependent upon implicit memory? Neuropsyc hologia, 36, 25-36.
22. Hust ad, K, & Beukelman, D. (2000). Integrating AAC in residua l natural speech. In D. Beukelman, K Yorkston, & J. Reichle (Eds.), Augmentative communication for adults with neurologic disorders (pp, 83-106). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
23. Hustad, K, & Beukelman, D. (2001). Speech intelligibility: Effects of linguistic cues and st imulus length for individuals with seve re dysarthria. Journal ofSp eech-Langu age-Hearing Research, 44, 497-510.
24. Hustad, K, Moreh ouse, T., & Gutmann, M. (2002). Augmentative and alte rn ative communication strategies forenhancing the usefuln ess of natural speech in children with severe intelligibility cha llenges. In J. Reichle, D. Beukelman, & J. Light (Eds.), Implementing and augm ent ati ve communi cation system: Exemplary strategies for beginning communicators (pp. 433-452). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
25. Hux, K, Burke, R., Elliot, J., & Ross, M. (2001). Communication interaction differences between natural speakers and AAC user s with traumati c brain injuries. Journal ofMedi cal Speech, Langu age, Path ology, 9, 71-86.
26. Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
27. King, J., Spoeneman, T., Stua rt, S., & Beukelman, D. (1995). Small t alk in adult conversation: Implications for AAC vocabulary selection. Augmentative and Altern ati ve Communication, 11, 260-264.
28. Klasn er, E., & Yorkston, K (2000). AAC for Huntington disease and Parkinson's disease. In D. Beukelman, K Yorkston, & Reichle, J. (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative commu nication for adults with acquired neur ologic di sorders (pp. 233-270). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
29. Ladtow, M., & Culp, D. (1992). Augmentative communication with the traumatic br ain-injury. In K Yorkston (Ed.), Augmentative communication in the medi cal sett ing (pp. 139244). Tucson, AZ: Communication Skill Builders.
30. Lasker, J., &Bedrosian, J. (2000).Acceptanc e ofAAC by adults with acquired disord ers. In D. Beukelman, K Yorkston, &J. Reichle (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communica tion for adults with acqu ired neurologic di sorders (pp. 107-136). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
31. Lasker, J., & Beukelm an, D. R. (1999). Peers' perceptions of sto ryte lling by an adult with aphasia. Aphasiology, 13(911), 857-869.
32. Light, J., Beesley, M., & Collie r, B. (1988). Transition through multiple augme ntati ve and alternative communication systems: A three-year case study of a head-injured adolescent. Augment ative and Alternative Communication, 4, 2-14.
33. Light, J., McNau ghton, D., Krezman, C., William s, M., & Gulen s, M. (2000). The mentor project: Sharing the knowledge of AAC users. Proceeding s of the International Conference for Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 9, 7375.
34. Light, J. C., & Gulens, M. (2000). In D. Beukelman, K Yorksto n, & J. Reichl e (Eds.), Augmentati ve and alternative communication for adults with acqui red neurologic disorders (pp. 137-182). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
35. Mathy, P., Yorkston, K, & Gutmann, M. (2000). AAC for in dividuals with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. In D. Beukelman, K Yorkston, & J. Reichl e (Eds.), Augmentative communication for adults with neurol ogic disorders (pp. 183-231). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brooke s.
36. Richter, M., Ball, L., Beukelman, D., Lask er, J., & Ullman, C. (in Press). Attitudes toward three communication modes used by persons with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis for storytelling to a singl e listener. Augmentative and Alternative Communication.
37. Rogers, M. A., King, J. M., & Alarcon, N B. (2000). In D. Beukelm an, K Yorkston, &J. Reichle (Eds.), Augment ative and alternative communication for adults with acquired neurologic dis orders (pp, 305-337). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brooke s.
38. Schank, R. (1990). Tell me a story: A new look at real and artificial memory. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.
39. Sohlb er g, M., & Mateer, C. (1989). Introduction to cognitive rehab il itation: Theory and pra ctice. New York: The Guilford Press.
40. Stuart, S., Lasker, J., & Beukelm an, D. (2000). AAC messa ge man agement. In D. Beukelman, K York ston, & J. Reichle (Eds.), Augmentative communication for adults with neurologic disorders (pp. 25-54). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
41. Stuart, S., Vanderhoof, D., & Beukelm an, D. R. (1993). Topic and vocabu lary use patterns of elderly women. Augm entati ve and Alternative Communicat ion, 9, 95-110.
42. Stuart, S., Vanderhoof, D., & Beukelman, D. (1994). Differences in topic reference of elderly men and women. Journal of Medical Sp eech, Langu age, Pathology, 2(2), 89-104.
43. Swash, M. (1998). Early diagnosis of ALSIMND. Journa l of Neurological Sciences, 160 (supplement), S33-S36.
44. Szerkeres, S., Ylvisak er, M., & Cohen, S. (1987). A framewo rk for cognitive rehabilitation therapy. In M. Ylviskaser & E. Gobble (Eds.), Communi ty re-entry for head inj ured adults (pp. 82-136). Boston: College Hill Publications.
45. Taite, R. (1997). Beyond one-bun, two-shoe: Recent advances in the psychological reh abili tation ofmemory disorders after acquired brain injury. Bra in Injury, 11, 907-918.
46. Wilson, A., Baddeley, A., &Evans, J. (1994). Errorless learning in the rehabilitation of memory impaired people. Neuropsychological Rehab ilitation, 4, 307-326.
47. Workinger, M., & Netsell, R. (1988). Restoration of intelligibl e speech 13 years post-head injury. Brain Injury, 2, 183-187.
48. Yang, C.-K (2000). Development of an augmentative and alternative communication interface for persons with memory and new-learning limitations. Unpublish ed dis sertation, Univers ity of Nebraska, Lincoln.
49. Yang, C.-K, Beukelman, B., & Tice, R. (2000). AAC Menu [Software application.] Univer sity of Nebraska, Lincoln.
50. Yorkston, K, Beukelman, D., Stand, E., & Bell, K (1999). Man agement of mot or speech di sord ers in children and adults. Austin, TX: Pro -ed.
51. Yorkston, K, Miller, R., & Strand, E. (1995). Man agement of speech and swallowing disorders in degenerative di sease. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corpora tion.
52. Yorkston, K, Strand, E., & Kennedy, M. (1996). Comprehe nsibility of dysarthric speech: Implications for assessment and treatment planning. American Journal of Speech Lan guage Path ology, 5, 55-66.