Retaining school children and families in community research: Lessons from the Study of Children's Activity and Nutrition (SCAN)

Journal of School Health

Volumn 73, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 51-57

  Frank, Gail C ^a   Nader, Philip R ^a,b   Zive, Michelle Murphy ^c   Broyles, Shelia L ^c   Brennan, Jesse J ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALTRUISM; COHORT ANALYSIS; ETHNOLOGY; FAMILY; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NUTRITION; PERSONNEL; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; REVIEW; SEX DIFFERENCE; ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CHILD; CHILD NUTRITION; CONSUMER; EPIDEMIOLOGY; FAMILY SIZE; FEMALE; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MALE; PATIENT SELECTION; PRESCHOOL CHILD; RESEARCH SUBJECT; STUDENT; UNITED STATES;

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT NUTRITION PHYSIOLOGY; CALIFORNIA; CHILD; CHILD NUTRITION PHYSIOLOGY; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; CONSUMER PARTICIPATION; FAMILY; FAMILY CHARACTERISTICS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; PATIENT SELECTION; RESEARCH SUBJECTS; SELECTION BIAS; STUDENTS;

EID: 0037636623     PISSN: 00224391     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2003.tb03571.x     Document Type: Review

References (20)

1. Hooks P, Tsong Y, Baranowski T, Henske JC, Nader PR, Levin J. Recruitment strategies for multiethnic family and community health research. Fam Community Health. 1998;11(1):48-59.
2. Riekert KA, Drotar D. Who participates in research on adherence to treatment in insulin- dependent diabetes mellitus? Implications and recommendations for research. J Pediatr Psychol. 1999;24(3):253-258.
3. Mohr DC, Goodkin DE, Masuoka L, et al. Treatment adherence and patient retention in the first year of a Phase-III clinical trial for the treatment of multiple sclerosis. Multiple Scler. 1999;5(3):192-197.
4. Nader PR. In schools as a point of access to children and families. Health behavior research in minority populations. Access, design, and implementation. National Institute of Health NHLBI;. 1992:35-46. NIH Publication 1992;92-2965.
5. Nader PR. In schools as a point of access to children and families. Health behavior research in minority populations. Access, design, and implementation. National Institute of Health NHLBI;. 1992:35-46. NIH Publication 1992;92-2965.
6. Susman EJ, Dorn LD, Fletcher JC. Participation in biomedical research: the consent process as viewed by children, adolescents, young adults, and physicians. J Pediatr. 1992;121(4):547-552.
7. National Institutes of Health. Policy on the inclusion of children as subjects in clinical research. Bethesda, Md: Office of Extramural Research; 1997;26(3).
8. Lindeke LL, Hauck M, Tanner M. Practical issues in obtaining child assent for research. J Pediatr Nurs. 2000;(2):99-104.
9. Stevens-Simon C, Dolgan JI, Kelly L, Singer D. The effect of monetary incentives and peer support groups on repeat adolescent pregnancies. a randomized trial of the Dollar-a-Day Program. JAMA. 1997;26;277(12):977-982.
10. Anthony H, Paxton S, Bines J, Phelan P. Psychosocial predictors of adherence to nutritional recommendations and growth outcomes in children with cystic fibrosis. J Psychosom Res. 1999;47(6):623-634.
11. Corkum P, Rimer P, Schachar R. Parental knowledge of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and opinions of treatment options: impact on enrollment and adherence to a 12-month treatment trial. Can J Psychiatr. 1999;44(10):1043-1048.
12. Riesch SK, Tosi CB, Thurston CA. Accessing young adolescents and their families for research. Image J Nurs Sch. 1999;31(4):323-326.
13. McCormick LK, Crawford M, Anderson RH, Gittelsohn J, Kingsley B, Upson D. Recruiting adolescents into qualitative tobacco research studies: experiences and lessons learned. J Sch Health. 1999;69(3):95-99.
14. Williams C. Gender, adolescence and the management of diabetes. J Adv Nurs. 1999;30(5):1160.
15. Shavers-Hornaday VL, Lynch CF, Burmeister LF, Torner JC. Why are African Americans under-represented in medical research studies? Impediments to participation. Ethnic Health. 1997;2(1-2):31-45.
16. Freedman TG. "Why don't they come to Pike Street and ask us"? Black American women's health concerns. Soc Sci Med. 1998;47(7):941-947.
17. Atkins CJ, Patterson TL, Roppe BE, Kaplan RM, Sallis JF, Nader PR. Recruitment issues, health habit, and the decision to participate in a health promotion program. Am J Prev Med. 1987;3(2):87-93.
18. Verheggen FW, Jonkers R, Kok G. Patients' perceptions on informed consent and the quality of information disclosure in clinical trials. Patient Educ Couns. 1996;29(2):137-153.
19. Atwood JR, Haase J, Rees-McGee S, et al. Reasons related to adherence in community-based field studies. Patient Educ Couns. 1992;19(3):251-259.
20. Cook TD, Campbell DT. Quasi-Experimentation: Design & Analysis for Field Settings. Boston, Mass: Houghton Mifflin Co; 1997.