A diachronie coherence model for language program evaluation

Language Learning

Volumn 53, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 1-33

  Ross, Steven J ^a  

^a KWANSEI GAKUIN UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037634480     PISSN: 00238333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9922.00209     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Alderson, C., & Beretta, A. (1992). Evaluating second language education. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
2. Asher, H. B. (1983). Causal modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3. Bachman, L. F. (1989). The development and use of criterion-referenced tests of language ability in language program evaluation. In R. K. Johnson (Ed.), The second language curriculum (pp. 242-258). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
4. Beretta, A. (1986a). Program-fair language teaching evaluation. TESOL Quarterly, 20(3), 431-445.
5. Beretta, A. (1986b). Toward a methodology of ESL program evaluation. TESOL Quarterly, 20(1), 144-155.
6. Beretta, A. (1986c). A case for field-experimentation in program evaluation. Language Learning, 36(3), 295-309.
7. Beretta, A., & Davies, A. (1985). Evaluation of the Bangalore Project. ELT Journal, 39, 121-127.
8. Bickman, L. (2000). Research design: Donald Campbell's legacy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9. Brindley, G. (1998). Outcomes-based assessment and reporting in language programs: A review of the issues. Language Testing, 15, 45-85.
10. Brindley, G. (2001). Outcomes-based assessment in practice: Some examples and insights. Language Testing, 18(4), 393-407.
11. Brinton, D. M., Snow, M. A., & Wesche, M. B. (1989). Content-based second language instruction. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
12. Brown, J. D. (1989). Language program evaluation: A synthesis of existing possibilities. In R. K. Johnson (Ed.), The second language curriculum (pp. 222-241). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
13. Brown, J. D. (1993). A comprehensive criterion-referenced testing project. In D. Douglas and C. Chapelle (Eds.), A new decade of language testing research (pp. 163-184). Washington, DC: TESOL.
14. Brown, J. D., & Hudson, J. (1998). Alternatives in language assessment. TESOL Quarterly, 32(4), 653-675.
15. Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16. Burstein, L., & Guiton, G. W. (1984). Methodological perspectives on documenting program impact. Advances in Special Education, 4, 21-42.
17. Campbell, D. T. (1978). Qualitative knowing in action research. In M. Brenner, P. Marsh, & M. Brenner (Eds.), The social context of method (pp. 184-209). London: Croon Helm.
18. Campbell, D. T., & Russo, M. J. (1999). Social experimentation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19. Campbell, D. T., & Russo, M. J. (2001). Social measurement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20. Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis for field settings. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
21. Datnow, A. (2000). Power and politics in the adoption of school reform models. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 22(4), 357-374.
22. Davis, J. A. (1985). The logic of causal order. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23. Elley, W. B. (1989). Tailoring the evaluation to fit the context. In R. K. Johnson (Ed.), The second language curriculum (pp. 270-285). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
24. Engel, U., & Reinecke, J. (1996). Analysis of change: Advanced techniques in panel data analysis. New York: de Gruyter.
25. Finkel, S. E. (1995). Causal analysis with panel data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26. Glass, G. (1978). Standards and criteria. Journal of Educational Measurement, 15, 237-261.
27. Gottman, J. M. (1995). The analysis of change. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
28. Hambleton, R. K. (2001). Setting performance standards on educational assessments and criteria for evaluating the process. In G. J. Cizek (Ed.), Setting performance standards: Concepts, methods, and perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
29. Henning, G. (1982). Growth-referenced evaluation of foreign language instructional programs. TESOL Quarterly, 16(4), 467-477.
30. House, E. R. (1993). Professional evaluation: Social impact and political consequences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31. Hudson, T. D. (1989). Mastery decisions in program evaluation. In R. K. Johnson (Ed.), The second language curriculum (pp. 259-269). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
32. Hudson, T. D., & Lynch, B. K. (1984). A criterion-referenced measurement approach to ESL achievement testing. Language Testing, 1(2), 171-201.
33. Kreft, I. G. G., & de Leeuw, J. (1998). Introducing multilevel modeling. London: Sage.
34. Long, M. H. (1984). Process and product in ESL program evaluation. TESOL Quarterly, 18(3), 409-425.
35. Lynch, B. K. (1990). A context-adaptive model for program evaluation. TESOL Quarterly, 24(1), 23-42.
36. Lynch, B. K. (1996). Language program evaluation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
37. Maruyama, G. M. (1998). Basics of structural equation modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
38. McNamara, T. (2001). Language assessment as social practice: Challenges for research. Language Testing, 18(4), 333-350.
39. Mead, R. (1988). The design of experiments. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
40. Mohr, L. (1992). Impact analysis for program evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
41. Newman, F. M., Smith, B., Allensworth, E., & Bryk, A. S. (2001). Instructional program coherence: What it is and why it should guide school improvement policy. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(4), 297-321.
42. Palmer, A. (1992). Issues in evaluating input-based language teaching programs. In C. Alderson & A. Beretta, Evaluating Second Language Education (pp. 144-166). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
43. Pedhazur, E. (1986). Multiple regression in behavioral research. (2nd ed.). Chicago: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
44. Popham, W. J. (1978). Criterion-referenced measurement. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
45. Popham, W. J. (1981). Modern educational measurement. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
46. Rea-Dickens, P., & Germaine, K. P. (1998). The price of everything and value of nothing: Trends in language program evaluation. In P. ReaDickens & K. P. Germaine (Eds.), Managing evaluation and innovation in language teaching: Building bridges. London: Longman.
47. Roberts, C. (1998). Language and cultural issues in innovation: The European dimension. In P. Rea-Dickens & K. P. Germaine (Eds.), Managing evaluation and innovation in language teaching: Building bridges. London: Longman.
48. Robinson, P. (2002). Individual differences in instructed language learning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
49. Ross, S. (1992). Program-defining evaluation in a decade of eclecticism. In C. Alderson & A. Beretta, Evaluating second language education. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
50. Schumacker, R. E. & Lomax, R. G. (1996). Beginners guide to structural equation modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
51. Scriven, M. (1967). The methodology of evaluation. In R. W. Tyler, R. M. Gagne, & M. Scriven, Perspectives on curriculum evaluation (pp. 39-83). Chicago: Rand McNally.
52. Shadish, W. (2000). The empirical program of quasi-experimentation. In L. Bickman (Ed.), Research design: Donald Campbell's legacy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
53. Shadish, W., Cook, T., & Leviton, L. (1991). Foundations of program evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
54. Shepard, L. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 1-14.
55. Snijders, T., & Bosker, J. (1999). Multilevel analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
56. Zeller, R., & Carmines, E. (1980). Measurement in the social sciences. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.