Sociocultural limits in informed consent in dementia research

Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders

Volumn 17, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2003, Pages

  Guerrero Jr , Martin ^a   Heller, Peter L ^a  

^a TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Alzheimer disease; Ethnicity; Informed consent; Socioeconomic status

Indexed keywords

ALZHEIMER DISEASE; ATTITUDE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; CONFERENCE PAPER; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; CUSTODY; DECISION MAKING; ETHNIC DIFFERENCE; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; MEDICAL ETHICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOCIOECONOMICS;

EID: 0037633228     PISSN: 08930341     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00002093-200304001-00005     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. National Institute of Health (NIH). Research involving individuals with questionable capacity to consent: points to consider. Available at http://www.grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/questionablecapacity.htm
2. Federal Drug Administration. 1998 - Frequently asked questions. Available at http://www.Fda.gov/irb - 1998 frequently asked questions. V.p.9 and 51.p.14.
3. Federal Drug Administration. General requirements for informed consent. Available at http://www.Fda.gov/irb - 21 CFR 50.20.
4. McCarthy CR. Historical background of clinical trials involving women and minorities. Acad Med 1994;69:695-8.
5. Hart VR, Gallagher-Thompson D, Davies HD, DiMinno M, Lessin PJ. Strategies for increasing participation of ethnic minorities in Alzheimer's disease diagnostic centers: a multifaceted approach in California. Gerontologist 1966;36:259-62.
6. Perkins HS, Supik JD, Hazuda HP. Autopsy decisions: the possibility of conflicting cultural attitudes. J Clin Ethics 1993;4:145-54.
7. Gill EF, Bob S. Culturally competent research: an ethnical perspective. Clin Psychol Rev 1999;19:45-55.
8. Hazuda HP. Minority issues in Alzheimer disease outcomes research. Alz Dis Assoc Disord 1997;11 (suppl 6):156-61
9. Milgram S. Behavioral study of obedience. J Abnorm Soc Psychol 1963;67:371-8.
10. Mansfield CJ, Mitchell J, King DE. The doctor as God's mechanic? Beliefs in the southeastern United States. Soc Sci Med 2002;54:399-409.
11. Harvey DL. Potter addition: poverty, family, and kinship in a heartland community. Hawthorne. NY: Aldine de Gruyter, 1993.
12. Hoppe SK, Heller PL. Alienation, familism and the utilization of health services by Mexican Americans. J Health Soc Behav 1975; 16:304-14.
13. Wilson WJ. The truly disadvantaged: the inner city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987.
14. Wilson WJ. When work disappears: the world of the new urban poor. New York: Knopf, 1996.
15. Schwabe AM, Kodras J. Race, class, and psychological distress: contextual variations across four American communities. Read at the annual meeting of the Society for the Study of Social Problems, 1997.
16. Briones DF, Heller PL, Aguirre-Hauchbaum SF, Chalfant HP, Roberts AE, Farr WF. Factors associated with psychological distress among Mexican-American and Anglo populations residing in a border city. In: Telles C, Karno M, eds. Latino mental health: current research and policy perspectives. Washington: National Institutes of Mental Health, 1994.
17. Kohn LP, Wilson MN. Social support networks in the African American family: utility for culturally compatible intervention. New Direct Child Dev 1995;68:35-58.
18. Heller PL, Briones DF, Roberts, AE, Aguirre-Hauchbaum SF. Source of support and mastery: the interaction of socioeconomic status and Mexican-American ethnicity. Soc Spectrum. In press.
19. Mirowsky J, Ross KE. Mexican culture and its emotional contradictions. J Health Soc Behav 25:2-13.
20. Pilisuk M, Montgomery MB, Parks SH, Acredolo C. Locus of control, life stress, and social networks: gender differenced in the health status of the elderly. Sex Roles 28:147-66.
21. Pearlin LI, Lieberman MA, Menaghan EO, Mullan JT. The stress process. J Health Soc Behav 22:337-56.