Using Anderson's statistic to compare distributions of consumer preference rankings

Journal of Sensory Studies

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 77-82

  Brockhoff, P B ^a   Best, D John ^b,c   Rayner, J C W ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WOLLONGONG   (Australia)

^c NONE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS); MARKETING; STATISTICAL METHODS;

MARKET SEGMENTATION;

FOOD PRODUCTS;

EID: 0037626049     PISSN: 08878250     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-459X.2003.tb00374.x     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. ANDERSON, R.L. 1959. Use of contingency tables in the analysis of consumer preference studies. Biometrics 15, 582-590.
2. BEST, D.J. and RAYNER, J.C.W. 2001. Application of the Stuart test to sensory evaluation data. Food Qual. Pref. 12, 353-357.
3. BROCKHOFF, P.B., BEST, D.J. and RAYNER, J.C.W. 2003. Partitioning Andersen's statistic for tied data. J. Statistical Inference Planning, In Press.
4. GACULA, M.C. and SINGH, J. 1984. Statistical Methods in Food and Consumer Research. Academic Press, New York.
5. O'MAHONY, M. 1986. Sensory Evaluation of Food - Statistical Methods and Procedures, p. 336, Marcel Dekker, New York.
6. RAYNER, J.C.W. and BEST, D.J. 2001. A Contingency Table Approach to Nonparametric Testing. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, Florida.
7. rd Ed). Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, Florida.