The influence of physical attractiveness and gender on ultimatum game decisions

Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

Volumn 79, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 199-215

  Solnick, Sara J ^a   Schweitzer, Maurice E ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037615874     PISSN: 07495978     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/obhd.1999.2843     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Ambady N., Rosenthal R. Half a minute: Predicting teacher evaluations from thin slices of nonverbal behavior and physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 64:1993;431-441.
2. Ayres I. Fair driving: Gender and race discrimination in retail car negotiations. Harvard Law Review. 104:1991;817-872.
3. Ayres I. Further evidence of discrimination in new car negotiations and estimates of its cause. Michigan Law Review. 94:1995;109-147.
4. Ayres I., Siegelman P. Race and gender discrimination in bargaining for a new car. American Economic Review. 85:1995;304-321.
5. Ball, S. B, &, Cech, P. (, 1993, ), Subject pool choice and treatment effects in economic laboratory research, Unpublished working paper, Virginia Polytechnic Institute.
6. Bardack N., McAndrew F. The influence of physical attractiveness and manner of dress on success in a simulated personnel decision. Journal of Social Psychology. 125:1985;777-778.
7. Camerer, C. (, 1999, ), The psychology of strategic thinking, Working paper, Caltech University.
8. Camerer C., Thaler R. Anomalies: Ultimatums, dictators, and manners. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 9:1995;209-219.
9. Carter J., Irons M. Are economists different, and if so, why? Journal of Economic Perspectives. 5:1991;171-177.
10. DeShields O., Kara A., Kaynak E. Source effects in purchase decisions: The impact of physical attractiveness and accent of salesperson. International Journal of Research in Marketing. 13:1996;89-101.
11. Dion K., Berscheid E., Walster E. What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 24:1972;285-290.
12. Eagly A. H., Ashmore R. D., Makhijani M. G., Longo L. C. What is beautiful is good, but...A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. Psychological Bulletin. 110:1991;109-128.
13. Eckel, C. C, &, Grossman, P. (, 1994, ), Chivalry and solidarity in ultimatum games, Unpublished working paper, Virginia Polytechnic Institute.
14. Everitt B. S. The analysis of repeated measures: A practical review with examples. The Statistician. 1:1995;113-135.
15. Frieze I. H., Olson J. E., Russell J. Attractiveness and income for men and women in management. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 21:1991;1039-1057.
16. Fuller R., Schoenberger R. The gender salary gap: Do academic achievement, internship experience, and college major make a difference? Social Science Quarterly. 72:1991;715-726.
17. Gerhart B., Rynes S. Determinants and consequences of salary negotiations by male and female MBA graduates. Journal of Applied Psychology. 76:1991;256-262.
18. Goldin, C. (, 1990, ), Understanding the gender gap, New York, Oxford Univ. Press.
19. Hamermesh D. S., Biddle J. E. Beauty and the labor market. American Economic Review. 84, 1994;1174-1194.
20. Hatfield, E, &, Sprecher, S. (, 1986, ), Mirror, mirror...: The importance of looks in everyday life, Albany, State Univ. of New York Press.
21. Heilman M. E. Sex bias in work settings: The lack of fit model. Research in Organizational Behavior. 5:1983;269-298.
22. Heilman M., Saruwatari L. When beauty is beastly: The effects of appearance and sex on evaluations of job applicants for managerial and nonmanagerial jobs. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance. 23:1979;360-372.
23. Jackson L. A. Gender, physical attractiveness, and sex roles in occupational treatment discrimination: The influence of trait and role assumption. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 13:1983;443-458.
24. James L. R., Demaree R. G, Wolf G. Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology. 69:1984;85-98.
25. Kagel, J, Kim, C, &, Moser, D. (, 1992, ), Ultimatum games with asymmetric information and asym metric payoffs, Mimeo, University of Pittsburgh.
26. Kahneman D., Knetsch J. L., Thaler R. H. Fairness and the assumptions of economics. Journal of Business. 59:1986a;S285-S300.
27. Kahneman D., Knetsch J. L., Thaler R. H. Fairness as a constraint on profit-seeking: Entitlements in the market. American Economic Review. 76:1986b;728-741.
28. Kaman V. S., Hartel C. E. Gender differences in anticipated pay negotiation strategies and outcomes. Journal of Business and Psychology. 9:1994;183-197.
29. King W. C., Hinson T. D. The influence of sex and equity sensitivity on relationship preferences, assessment of opponent, and outcomes in a negotiation experiment. Journal of Management. 20:1994;605-624.
30. Marlowe C. M., Schneider S. L., Nelson C. E. Gender and attractiveness biases in hiring decisions: Are more experienced managers less biased? Journal of Applied Psychology. 81:1996;11-21.
31. McCall M. Physical attractiveness and access to alcohol: What is beautiful does not get carded. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 27:1997;453-462.
32. Morrow P. Physical attractiveness and selection decision making. Journal of Management. 16:1990;45-60.
33. Morrow P., McElroy J., Stamper B., Wilson M. The effects of physical attractiveness and other demographic characteristics on promotion decisions. Journal of Management. 16:1990;723-736.
34. Murnighan, J. K, &, Saxon, M. S. (, 1994, ), Ultimatum bargaining by children and adults, Unpublished working paper, University of British Columbia Faculty of Commerce.
35. Pruitt D. G., Carnevale P., Forcey B., Van Slyck M. Gender effects in negotiation: Constituent surveillance and contentious behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 22:1986;264-275.
36. Raza S. M., Carpenter B. N. A model of hiring decisions in real employment interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology. 72:1987;596-603.
37. Rees A. The role of fairness in wage determination. Journal of Labor Economics. 11:1993;243-252.
38. Ross J., Ferris K. R. Interpersonal attraction and organizational outcomes: A field examination. Administrative Science Quarterly. 26:1981;617-632.
39. Roszell P., Kennedy D., Grabb E. Physical attractiveness and income attainment among Canadians. Journal of Psychology. 123:1989;547-559.
40. Roth A. E. Bargaining experiments. Kagel J., Roth A. E. Handbook of experimen tal economics. 1995;Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton.
41. Roth A. E., Prasnikar V., Okuno-Fujiwara M., Zamir S. Bargaining and market behavior in Jerusalem, Ljubljana, Pittsburgh, and Tokyo: An experimental study. American Economic Review. 81:1991;1068-1095.
42. Rynes S., Gerhart B. Interviewer assessments of applicant 'fit': An exploratory investigation. Personnel Psychology. 43:1990;13-34.
43. Slonim, R, &, Roth, A. (, 1995, ), Financial incentives and learning in ultimatum games, Unpublished working paper, State University of New York at Stony Brook.
44. Snyder M., Tanke E. D., Berscheid E. Social perception and interpersonal behavior: On the self-fulfilling nature of social stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 35:1977;656-666.
45. Solnick, S. J. (, 1997, ), Gender differences in the ultimatum game, Unpublished working paper, University of Miami.
46. Stevens C. K., Bavetta A. G., Gist M. E. Gender differences in the acquisition of salary negotiation skills: The role of goals, self-efficacy and perceived control. Journal of Applied Psychology. 78:1993;723-735.
47. Thaler R. H. The ultimatum game. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2:1988;191-202.
48. Wood R. G., Corcoran M. E., Courant P. N. Pay differences among the highly paid: The male-female earnings gap in lawyer's salaries. Journal of Labor Economics. 11:1993;417-441.