Self-managing work teams: An empirical study of group cohesiveness in "natural work groups" at a Harley-Davidson motor company plant

Small Group Research

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 101-120

  Chansler, Phillip A ^a   Swamidass, Paul M ^a,b   Cammann, Cortlandt ^c  

^a AUBURN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c Cranfield University ^*

Author keywords

Harley Davidson Motor Company; Natural work groups; Self managing work teams; Small group cohesiveness

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037608779     PISSN: 10464964     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1046496402239579     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Bateson, P. (1988). The biological evolution of cooperation and trust. In D. Gambetta (Ed.), Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relations (pp. 14-30). New York: Basil Blackwell.
2. Brawley, L. R., Carron, A. V., & Widmeyer, W. N. (1988). Exploring the relationship between cohesion and group resistance to disruption. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 10, 199-213.
3. Cammann, C., Fichman, M., Jenkins, G. D., & Klesh, J. R. (1983). Assessing the attitudes and perceptions of organization members. In S. E. Seashore, E. E. Lawler III, P. H. Mirvis, & C. Cammann (Eds.), Assessing organizational change: A guide to methods, measures, and practices (pp. 71-138). New York: John Wiley.
4. Carron, A. V., Widmeyer, W. N., & Brawley, L. R. (1985). The development of an instrument to assess cohesion in sports teams: The Group Environment Questionnaire. Journal of Sport Psychology, 7, 244-266.
5. Chang, A., & Bordia, P. (2001). A multidimensional approach to the group cohesion-group performance relationship. Small Group Research, 32(4), 379-405.
6. Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 98-104.
7. Cota, A. A., Evans, C. R., Dion, K. L., Kilik, L., & Longman, R. S. (1995). The structure of group cohesion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(6), 572-580.
8. DeMichelis, G. (1990). Computer support for cooperative work. London: Butler Fox.
9. Evans, C. R., & Dion, K. L. (1991). Group cohesion and performance: A meta-analysis. Small Group Research, 22, 175-186.
10. Feldman, R. A. (1968). Interrelationships among three bases of group integration. Sociometry, 31, 30-46.
11. Festinger, L. (1950). Informal social communication. Psychological Review, 57, 271-282.
12. Forsythe, D. (1990). Group dynamics. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
13. Gilbert, J. A., & Tang, T. L.-P. (1998). An examination of organizational trust antecedents. Public Personnel Management, 27(3), 321-338.
14. Griffith, J. (1988). Measurement of group cohesion in U.S. Army units. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 2, 149-171.
15. Gross, N., & Martin, W. E. (1952). On group cohesiveness. American Journal of Sociology, 57, 546-554.
16. Gully, S. M., Devine, D. J., & Whitney, D. J. (1995). A meta-analysis of cohesion and performance. Small Group Research, 26(4), 497-525.
17. Hackman, J. R. (1992). Group influences on individuals in organizations. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 199-267). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
18. Harley-Davidson. (1997). Kansas City labor agreement between Harley-Davidson Motor Company and International Association of Machinists and United Paperworkers International Union. Kansas City, MO: Harley-Davidson Motor Company.
19. Harley-Davidson. (1999). Kansas City operating system: 1-37. Kansas City, MO: Kansas City Harley-Davidson Final Assembly Plant.
20. Harrison, D. A., Price, K. H., & Bell, M. P. (1998). Beyond relational demography: Time and the effect of surface-and deep-level diversity on work group cohesion. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 96-107.
21. Jones, G. R., & George, J. M. (1998). The experience and evolution of trust: Implications for cooperation and teamwork. Academy of Management Journal, 23(3), 531-546.
22. Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 709-734.
23. McCreery, J. K., & Bloom, M. C. (2000). Teams: Design and implementation. In P. M. Swamidass (Ed.), Encyclopedia of production & manufacturing management. Boston, MA: Kluwer.
24. Mishra, J., & Morrissey, M. A. (1990). Trust in employee/employer relationships: A survey of West Michigan managers. Public Personnel Management, 19(4), 443-463.
25. Mullen, B., & Copper, C. (1994). The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration. Psychological Bulletin, 115(2), 210-227.
26. Neter, J., Kutner, M. H., Nachtsheim, C. J., & Wasserman, W. (1996). Applied linear statistical models (4th ed.). Chicago, IL: Irwin.
27. Noe, R. A. (1999). Employee training & development. Boston, MA: Irwin McGraw-Hill.
28. Orsburn, J. D., Moran, L., Musselwhite, E., Zenger, J. H., & Perrin, C. (1990). Self-directed work teams: The new American challenge. In J. S. Ott (Ed.), Classic readings in organizational behavior (2nd ed., pp. 272-281). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.
29. Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4), 531-544.
30. Podsakoff, P. M., Todor, W. D., Grover, R. A., & Huber, V. L. (1984). Situational moderators of leader reward and punishment behaviors: Fact or fiction? Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 34, 21-63.
31. Polley, D., & VanDyne, L. (1994). The limits and liabilities of self-managing work teams. In M. M. Beyerlein & D. A. Johnson (Eds.), Theories of self-managing work teams (Vol. 1, pp. 1-38). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
32. Prapavessis, H., & Carron, A. V. (1997). Cohesion and work output. Small Group Research, 28(2), 294-301.
33. Schachter, S., Ellertson, J., McBride, D., & Gregory, D. (1951). An experimental study of cohesiveness and productivity. Human Relations, 4, 229-238.
34. Schriesheim, J. F. (1980). The social context of leader-subordinate relations: An investigation of the effect of group cohesiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 183-194.
35. Seashore, S. E. (1955). Group cohesiveness in the industrial work group. Ann Arbor, MI: Survey Research Institute for Social Research.
36. Steiner, I. (1972). Group processes and productivity. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
37. Stogdill, R. M. (1972). Group productivity, drive, and cohesiveness. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 8, 376-396.
38. Stokes, J. P. (1983a). Components of group cohesion: Intermember attraction, instrumental value, and risk taking. Small Group Behavior, 14, 163-173.
39. Stokes, J. P. (1983b). Toward an understanding of cohesion in personal change groups. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 33, 449-467.
40. Stokes, J. P., Fuehrer, A., & Childs, L. (1983). Group member's self-disclosures: Relation to perceived cohesion. Small Group Behavior, 14, 63-76.
41. Teerlink, R., & Ozley, L. (2000). More than a motorcycle: The leadership journey at Harley-Davidson. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
42. The Working Group. (1999). Livelyhood: Carpool to nirvana [Videotape]. Oakland, CA: Author.
43. Wech, B. A., Mossholder, K. W., Steel, R. P., & Bennett, N. (1998). Does work group cohe-siveness affect individual's performance and organizational commitment?: A cross-level examination. Small Group Research, 29(4), 472-494.
44. Yukelson, D., Weinberg, R., & Jackson, A. (1984). A multidimensional group cohesion instrument for intercollegiate basketball teams. Journal of Sport Psychology, 6, 103-117.
45. Zucker, L. G. (1987). Institutional theories of organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 13, 443-464.