Assessing academic contributions in landscape architecture

Landscape and Urban Planning

Volumn 64, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 119-129

  Milburn, Lee Anne S ^a   Brown, Robert D ^b   Mulley, Susan J ^a   Hilts, Stewart G ^b  

^a MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

Author keywords

Assessment; Design; Outreach; Research; Scholarship; Teaching

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; ENGINEERING EDUCATION; PROFESSIONAL ASPECTS; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT; TEACHING;

FACULTY MEMBERS;

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN;

ACADEMIC RESEARCH; ARCHITECTURE; EDUCATION; LANDSCAPE PLANNING;

EID: 0037599601     PISSN: 01692046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00204-9     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Armstrong, H., 1999. Design studios as research: an emerging paradigm for landscape architecture. Landscape Rev. 5 (2), 5-25.
2. Baron, R.M., 1981. The design studio as theater of investigation. In: Comerio, M.C., Chusid, J.M. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 69th Annual Meeting of the Association of Collegiate Schools of Architecture on Teaching Architecture. Association of Collegiate Schools of Architecture, Washington, DC, pp. 220-225.
3. Benson, J.F., 1998. On research, scholarship and design in landscape architecture. Landscape Res. 23 (2), 198-204.
4. Bowring, J., 1999. Editorial: the issue of the refereed studio. Landscape Rev. 5 (2), 1-4.
5. Boyer, E.L., 1990, Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate. The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, Princeton, NJ.
6. Boyer, E.L., Mitgang, L.D., 1996. Building Community: A New Future for Architecture Education and Practice. The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, Princeton, NJ.
7. Brink, L.A., 1997. Research and practice - a model for the design studio. In: Raval, S.R. (Ed.), CELA Proceedings on Building Toward Diversity. Council of Educators in Landscape Architecture, Asheville, NC, p. 26.
8. Chenoweth, R., 1992. Research: hype and reality. Landscape Architecture Mag. 82 (3), 47-48.
9. Chenoweth, R., Chidister, M., 1983. Attitudes toward research in landscape architecture: a study of the discipline. Landscape J. 2, 98-113.
10. Cooper Marcus, C., Francis, M. (Eds.), 1998. People Places: Design Guidelines for Urban Open Space, 2nd ed. Nostrand Reinhold (Van), New York.
11. Dagenhart, R., Sawicki, D., 1992. Architecture and planning: the divergence of two fields. J. Plann. Educ. Res. 12, 1-16.
12. Dyck, R.G., 1994. Discipline vs. profession: a comment on the meaning of design. J. Plann. Educ. Res. 13 (2), 143-146.
13. Eberhard, J.P., 1968. A humanist case for the system's approach. Am. Inst. Architects J. July, 34-38.
14. Edwards, B., 1987. Drawing on the Artist Within. Collins, New York.
15. Feldman, K.A., 1987. Research productivity and scholarly accomplishment of college teachers as related to their instructional effectiveness: a review and exploration. Res. Higher Learn. 26 (3), 227-297.
16. Glassick, C.E., Huber, M.T., Maeroff, G.I., 1997. Scholarship Assessed: A Special Report on Faculty Evaluation. The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, Princeton, NJ.
17. Harris, R., 1995. The demands and principles of consultation. Plann. Quart. 117, 5-7.
18. Hutchings, P., Shulman, L.S., 1999. The Scholarship of Teaching: New Elaborations, New Developments, Change. September/ October, pp. 11-15.
19. Innes, J.E., 1996. Planning through consensus building. J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 62 (4), 460-472.
20. Kerlinger, F.N., 1986. Foundations of Behavioral Research, 3rd ed. Holt, Rinchart & Winston, Fort Worth, TX.
21. LaGro, J.A., 1999. Research capacity: a matter of semantics? Landscape J. 18 (2), 179-186.
22. Magee, B., 1985. An Introduction to Karl Popper. Open Court, La Salle, IL.
23. McHarg, I.L., 1997. Ecology and design. In: Thompson, G.F., Steiner, F.R. (Eds.), Ecological Design and Planning. Wiley, New York, pp. 321-332.
24. McLaughlin, R., 1991. Research in landscape architecture. In: Westphal, J. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Conference on CELA Selected Papers. Landscape Architecture Foundation, Washington, DC, pp. 234-235.
25. Midwinter, J.E., 1997. A question of quality. Inst. Electr. Engr. Rev. 43 (2), 66-70.
26. Milburn, L.S., 1999. Research on research: the application of attitude theory to research attitudes and behaviours of educators in landscape architecture. Unpublished MLA dissertation, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ont.
27. Milburn, L.S., Brown, R.D., Paine, C., 2001. Research on research: research attitudes and behaviors of landscape architecture faculty in North America. Landscape Urban Plann. 57, 57-67.
28. Nassauer, J.I., 1985. Bringing science to landscape architecture. In: Stoltz, R. (Ed.), Proceedings of the CELA Forum on Issues of Teaching and Instructional Development in Professional Education. Council of Educators in Landscape Architecture, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ont., pp. 41-44.
29. Palmer, J.F., Smardon, R.C., Arany, J., 1984. Summary of the landscape architecture research needs survey. Agora (Winter), 17-19.
30. Patrick, W.J., Stanley, E.C., 1996. Assessment of research quality. Res. Higher Educ. 37 (1), 23-42.
31. Riley, R., 1990. Editorial commentary: some thoughts on scholarship and publication. Landscape J. 9 (1), 47-50.
32. Riley, R., 1995. Most important questions. Landscape J. 11 (2), 160-181.
33. Rosenberg, A.M., 1986. An emerging paradigm for landscape architecture. Landscape J. 5 (2), 75-82.
34. Rosenzweig, R., 1999. The scholarship of teaching: two suggestions and one caution. Inventio: Creative Thinking About Learning and Teaching 1 (1) (http://www.doiiit.gmu.edu/Archives/feb98/royros.htm).
35. Rudd, E., 1988. The evaluation of the quality of research. Stud. Higher Educ. 13 (1), 45-57.
36. Schön, D.A., 1988. Toward a marriage of artistry and applied science in the architectural design studio. J. Architectural Educ. 41 (4), 4-10.
37. Selman, P., 1995. Editorial: reflecting on practice. Landscape Res. 20 (2), 49.
38. Selman, P., 1998. Landscape design as research: an emerging debate. Landscape Res. 23 (2), 195-196.
39. Shulman, L.S., 1995. Course anatomy: the dissection and analysis of knowledge through teaching. In: Hutchings, P. (Ed.), The Course Portfolio: How Faculty can Examine their Teaching to Advance Practice and Improve Student Learning. American Association for Higher Education, Washington, DC.
40. Steinitz, C., 1995. Design is a verb design is a noun. Landscape J. 14 (2), 188-200.
41. Steinitz, C., 1998. The shape of things to come? Landscape Architecture 88 (1), 62-67.
42. Thompson, I.H., 1998. Environmental ethics and the development of landscape architectural theory. Landscape Res. 23 (2), 175-194.
43. Thwaites, K., 1998. Landscape design as research: an exploration. Landscape Res. 23 (2), 196-198.
44. Tschumi, B., 1990. Questions of Space. The Architectural Association Press, London, England.
45. Vidler, A., 1992. History, theory and criticism. Lotus 72, 130-133.
46. Ward, S., 1999. A framework for incorporating the prevention of infectious disease transmission into the landscape design process. Unpublished MLA dissertation, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ont.
47. Zuckerman, H., Merton, R.K., 1971. Patterns of evaluation in science: institutionalisation, structure and functions of the referee system. Minerva 9, 66-100.