Modeling effects of partial rootzone irrigation on stomatal conductance and transpiration of young citrus trees

Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers

Volumn 46, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 345-357

  Brakke, Mary P ^a   Allen Jr , Leon H ^a   Jones, James W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Citrus; Root water uptake model; Stomatal conductance; Transpiration

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; FORESTRY; SOILS; SOLAR RADIATION; TRANSPIRATION; WATER;

STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE;

IRRIGATION;

IRRIGATION; STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE; TRANSPIRATION; TREE;

CITRUS;

EID: 0037594564     PISSN: 00012351     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Allen, L. H., Jr., M. P. Brakke, J. T. Baker, and J. W. Jones. 2000. Gas exchange and biomass responses of young citrus trees to partial rooting-volume irrigation. Soil Crop Sci. Soc. Florida Proc. 59: 37-45.
2. Arneth, A., F. M. Keliher, T. M. McSeveny, and A. N. Byers. 1999. Assessment of annual carbon exchange in a water-stressed Pinus radiata plantation: An analysis based on eddy covariance measurements and an integrated biophysical model. Global Change Biol. 5(5): 531-545.
3. Baille, M., R. Romarero-Aranda, and A. Baile. 1996. Stomatal conductance of rose whole plants in greenhouse conditions: Analysis and modelling. J. Hort. Sci. 71(6): 957-970.
4. Bates, L. M., and A. E. Hall. 1981. Stomatal closure with soil water depletion not associated with changes in bulk leaf water status. Oecol. 50(1): 60-65.
5. _. 1982. Diurnal and seasonal responses of stomatal conductance for cowpea plants subjected to different levels of environmental drought. Oecol. 54(3): 304-308.
6. Bennett, J. M., T. R. Sinclair, R. C. Muchow, and S. R. Costello. 1987. Dependence of stomatal conductance on leaf water potential, turgor potential, and relative water content of field-grown soybean and maize. Crop Sci. 27(5): 984-990.
7. Bielorai, H., and K. Mendel. 1969. The simultaneous measurement of apparent photosynthesis and transpiration of citrus seedlings in different soil moisture levels. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 94(3): 201-204.
8. Bielorai, H., S. Dasberg, Y. Erner, and M. Brum. 1981. The effect of various soil moisture regimes and fertilizer levels on citrus yield response under partial wetting of the root. Proc. Int. Soc. Citric. 2: 585-589.
9. Black, J. D. F., and D. W. West. 1974. Water uptake by an apple tree with various proportions of the root system supplied with water. In Proc. Second Int. Drip Irrig. Congress, 432-433. San Diego, Cal.: University of California-Riverside.
10. Blackman, P. G., and W. J. Davies. 1985. Root to shoot communication in maize plants of the effects of soil drying. J. Exp. Bot. 36(162): 39-48.
11. Brakke, M. P. 1989. Gas exchange and growth responses of citrus trees to partial irrigation, soil water, and atmospheric conditions. PhD diss. Gainesville, Fla.: University of Florida. Diss. Abstr. 90-28499. Diss. Abstr. Int. 51-05B:2125.
12. Brakke, M. and L. H. Allen, Jr. 1995. Gas exchange of Citrus seedlings at different temperatures, vapor-pressure deficits, and soil water contents. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 120(3): 497-504.
13. Cohen, S., S. Moreshet, L. Le Guillou, J. C. Simon, and M. Cohen. 1997. Response of citrus trees to modified radiation regime in semi-arid conditions. J. Exp. Bot. 48(306): 35-44.
14. Coutts, M. P. 1981. Leaf water potential and control of water loss in droughted Sitka spruce seedlings. J. Exp Bot. 32(131): 1193-1201.
15. Davies, W. J., and J. Zhang. 1991. Root signals and the regulation of growth and development of plants in drying soil. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. Mol. Biol. 42: 55-76.
16. Davies, W. J., C. J. Atkinson, and J. Zhang. 1989. Mechanism of plant perception response to environmental stimulus. Monograph 20-1989. British Plant Growth Regulator Group.
17. Davies, W. J., F. Tardieu, and C. L. Trejo. 1994. How do chemical signals work in plants that grow in dry soil? Plant Physiol. 104(2): 309-314.
18. Fort, C., M. L. Fauveau, F. Muller, P. Label, A. Granier, and E. Dreyer. 1997. Stomatal conductance, growth, and root signaling in young oak seedlings subjected to partial soil drying. Tree Physiology 17(5): 281-289.
19. Fort, C., F. Muller, P. Label, A. Granier, and E. Dreyer. 1998. Stomatal conductance, growth, and root signaling in Betula pendula seedlings subjected to partial soil drying. Tree Physiology 18(11): 769-776.
20. Gardner, W. R. 1960. Dynamic aspects of water availability to plants. Soil Sci. 89(2): 63-73.
21. Gollan, T., N. C. Turner, and E. D. Schulze. 1985. The response of stomata and leaf gas exchange to vapor pressure deficits and soil water content: III. In the sclerophyllous woody species Nerium oleander. Oecol. 65(3): 356-362.
22. Gollan, T., J. B. Passioura, and R. Munns. 1986. Soil water status affects the stomatal conductance of fully turgid wheat and sunflower leaves. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 13(4): 459-464.
23. Gowing, D. J., W. J. Davies, and H. G. Jones. 1990. A positive root-sourced signal as an indicator of soil drying in apple, Malus domestica Borkh. J. Exp. Bot. 41(233): 1535-1540.
24. Hainsworth, J. M., and L. A. G. Aylmore. 1986. Water extraction by single plant roots. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J. 50(4): 841-848.
25. Hall, A. E. 1982. Mathematical models of plant water loss and plant water relations. In Physiological Plant Ecology II: Water Relations and Carbon Assimilation. Vol. 12b: 231-261. O. L. Lange, P. S. Nobel, C. B. Osmond, and E. Zieger, eds. New York, N.Y.: Springer-Verlag.
26. Hall, A. E., S. E. Camacho-B., and M. R. Kaufmann. 1975. Regulation of water loss by citrus leaves. Physiol. Plant. 33(1): 62-65.
27. Hillel, D., C. van Beek, and H. Talpaz. 1975. A microscopic-scale model of soil water uptake and salt movement to plant roots. Soil Sci. 120(5): 385-399.
28. 2/climate connection. Water Resour. Res. 22(12): 1702-1716.
29. Jarvis, P. G. 1976. The interpretation of the variations in leaf water potential and stomatal conductance found in canopies in the field. Phil. Trans. Royal Soc. London B. 273(927): 593-610.
30. Jarvis, A. J., and W. J. Davies. 1998. The coupled response of stomatal conductance to photosynthesis and transpiration. J. Exp. Bot. 49(special issue): 399-406.
31. Jones, H. G. 1986. Plants and Microclimate. A Quantitative Approach to Environmental Plant Physiology. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
32. _. 1998. Stomatal control of photosynthesis and transpiration. J. Exp. Bot. 49(special issue): 387-398.
33. Jones, H. G., and F. Tardieu. 1998. Modelling water relations of horticultural crops: A review. Scientia Horticulturae 74(1/2): 21-46.
34. Jones, P. H. J. W. Jones, L. H. Allen, Jr., and J. W. Mishoe. 1984. Dynamic computer control of closed environmental plant growth chambers: Design and verification. Trans. ASAE 27(3): 879-888.
35. Kaufmann, M. R., and Y. Levy. 1976. Stomatal response of Citrus jambhiri to water stress and humidity. Physiol. Plant. 38(2): 105-108
36. Khairi, M. M., and A. E. Hall. 1976a. Temperature and humidity effects on net photosynthesis and transpiration of citrus. Physiol. Plant. 36(1): 29-34.
37. _. 1976b. Comparative studies of net photosynthesis and transpiration of some citrus species and relatives. Physiol. Plant. 36(1): 35-39.
38. Kittas, C., N. Katsoulas, and A. Baille. 1999. Transpiration and canopy resistance of greenhouse soilless roses: Measurements and modeling. In Proc. 3rd. Int. Workshop on Models for Plant Growth and Control of the Shoot and Root Environment in Greenhouses (507): 61-68. Leuven, Belgium: International Society for Horticultural Science, Commission on Protected Cultivation.
39. Koo, R. C. J. 1978. Response of densely planted 'Hamlin' orange on two rootstocks to low volume irrigation. Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc. 91: 8-10.
40. Kriedemann, P. E. 1971. Photosynthesis and transpiration as a function of gaseous diffusive resistances in orange leaves. Physiol. Plant. 24(2): 218-225.
41. Lafolie, F., L. Bruckler, and F. Tardieu. 1991. Modeling root water potential and soil-root water transport: I. Model presentation. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J. 55(5): 1203-1212.
42. Levy, Y. 1980. Effect of evaporative demand on water relations of Citrus limon. Ann. Bot. 46(6): 695-700.
43. Marler, T. E. 1988. Growth of young 'Hamlin' orange trees as influenced by microsprinkler irrigation, fertilization, and nursery tree type. PhD diss. Gainesville, Fla.: University of Florida.
44. Meyer, W. S., and G. C. Green. 1981. Comparison of stomatal action of orange, soybean, and wheat under field conditions. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 8(1): 65-76.
45. Mielke, M. S., M. A. Oliva, N. F. de Barros, R. M. Penchel, C. A. Martinez, and A. C. de Almeida. 1999. Stomatal control of transpiration in the canopy of a clonal Eucalyptus grandis plantation. Trees 13(3): 152-160.
46. Oren, R., J. S. Sperry, G. G. Katul, D. E. Pataki, B. E. Ewers, N. Philips, and K. V. R. Schafer. 1999. Survey and synthesis of intra- and interspecific variation in stomatal sensitivity to vapor pressure deficit. Plant Cell Environ. 22(12): 1515-1526.
47. Osonubi, O. 1985. Responses of cowpeas [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] to progressive soil drought. Oecol. 66(4): 554-557.
48. Passioura, J. B. 1980. The transport of water from soil to shoot in wheat seedlings. J. Exp. Bot. 31(120): 333-345.
49. _. 1982. Water in the soil-plant-atmosphere continuum. In Physiological Plant Ecology II: Water Relations and Carbon Assimilation. Vol. 12b: 5-33. O. L. Lange, P. S. Nobel, C. B. Osmond, and E. Zieger, eds. New York, N.Y.: Springer-Verlag.
50. _. 1988. Water transport in and to roots. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. 39: 245-265.
51. Philip, J. R. 1957. The physical principles of soil water movement during irrigation cycle. In Proc. 3rd Int. Congress Irrig. Drain. 8: 125-154. New Delhi, India: International Commission on Irrigation and Drainage.
52. Schulze, E. D. 1986. Carbon dioxide and water vapor exchange in response to drought in the atmosphere and the soil. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. 37: 247-274.
53. Sinclair, T. R., and L. H. Allen, Jr. 1982. Carbon dioxide and water vapor exchange of leaves of field-grown citrus trees. J. Exp. Bot. 33(137): 1166-1175.
54. Sheriff, D. W. 1977. The effect of humidity on water uptake by, and viscous flow resistance of, excised leaves of a number of species: Physiological and anatomical observations. J. Exp. Bot. 28(107): 1399-1407.
55. Slack, D. C., C. T. Haan, and L. G. Wells. 1977. Modeling soil water movement into plant roots. Trans. ASAE 20(5): 919-933.
56. Smajstrla, A. G., and R. C. Koo. 1985. Effects of trickle irrigation methods and amounts of water applied on citrus yields. The Citrus Industry January: 20, 22-27, 30, 32, 70.
57. Sperry, J. R., F. R. Adler, G. S. Campbell, and J. P. Comstock. 1998. Limitations of plant water use by rhizosphere and xylem conductance: Results from a model. Plant Cell Environ. 21(4): 347-359.
58. Stanhill, G. 1972. Recent developments in water relations studies: Some examples from Israel citriculture. In Proc. 18th Int. Hort. Congress 4: 367-379. Leuven, Belgium: International Society for Horticultural Science, and the Israel Ministry of Agriculture.
59. Stoll, M., B. Loveys, and P. Dry. 2000. Hormonal changes induced by partial rootzone drying of irrigated grapevine. J. Exp. Bot. 51(350): 1627-1634.
60. Syvertsen, J. P. 1982. Minimum leaf water potential and stomatal closure in citrus leaves of different ages. Ann. Bot. 49(6): 827-834.
61. Syvertsen, J. P., M. L. Smith, Jr., and J. C. Allen. 1981. Growth rate and water relations of citrus leaf flushes. Ann. Bot. 47(1): 97-105.
62. Tan, C. S., and B. R. Buttery. 1982. The effect of soil moisture stress to various fractions of the root system on transpiration, photosynthesis, and internal water relations of peach seedlings. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 107(5): 845-849.
63. Tan, C. S., A. Cornelisse, and B. R. Buttery. 1981. Transpiration, stomatal conductance, and photosynthesis of tomato plants with various proportions of root system supplied with water. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 106(2): 147-151.
64. Tanner, C. B., and T. R. Sinclair. 1983. Efficient water use in crop production: Research or re-search? In Limitations to Efficient Water Use in Crop Production, 1-27. H. M. Taylor, W. R. Jordan, and T. R. Sinclair, eds. Madison, Wisc.: ASA-CSSA-SSSA.
65. Tardieu, F., and T. Simonneau. 1998. Variability among species of stomatal control under fluctuating soil water status and evaporative demand: Modeling isohydric and anisohydric behaviors. J. Exp. Bot. 49(special issue): 419-432.
66. Tardieu, F., J. Zhang, N. Katerji, O. Bethenod, S. Palmer, and W. J. Davies. 1992. Xylem ABA controls the stomatal conductance of field-grown maize subjected to soil compaction or soil drying. Plant Cell Environ. 15(2): 193-197.
67. Thimijan, R. W., and R. D. Heins. 1983. Photometric, radiometric, and quantum light units of measure: A review of procedures for interconversion. HortSci. 18(6): 818-822.
68. Thom, A. S. 1968. The exchange of momentum, mass, and heat between an artificial leaf and the airflow in a wind tunnel. Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 94(399): 44-45.
69. Tinklin, R., and P. E. Weatherley. 1968. The effect of transpiration rate on the leaf water potential of sand and soil rooted plants. New Phytol. 67(3): 605-615.
70. Trejo, C. L., A. L. Clephan, and W. J. Davies. 1995. How do stomata read abscisic acid signals? Plant Physiol. 109(3): 803-811.
71. 2 photosynthesis adaptation to water deficits. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 5(2): 179-194.
72. Turner, N. C., E. D. Schulze, and T. Gollan. 1984. The response of stomata and leaf gas exchange to vapor pressure deficits and soil water content: I. Species comparisons at high soil water contents. Oecol. 63(3): 338-342.
73. _. 1985. The response of stomata and leaf gas exchange to vapor pressure deficits and soil water content: II. In the mesophytic herbaceous species, Helianthus annus. Oecol. 65(3): 348-355.
74. Van Genuchten, M. T. 1980. A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J. 44(5): 892-898.
75. Vu, J. C. V., and G. Yelenosky. 1988. Water deficit and associated changes in some photosynthetic parameters in leaves of 'Valencia' orange (Citrus sinensis [L.] Osbeck). Plant Physiol. 88(2): 375-378.
76. Wijk, M. T. van, S. C. Dekker, W. Bouten, F. C. Bosveld, W. Kohsiek, K. Kramer, and G. M. J. Mohren. 2000. Modeling daily gas exchange of a Douglas-fir forest: Comparison of three stomatal conductance models with and without a soil water stress function. Tree Physiology 20(2): 115-122.
77. Yang, S. X. Liu, and M. T. Tyree. 1998. A model of stomatal conductance in sugar maple (Acer saccharum Marsh). J. Theoret. Biol. 191(2): 197-211.
78. Yao, C. S. Moreshet, and B. Aloni. 2001. Water relations and hydraulic control of stomatal behavior in bell pepper plant in partial soil drying. Plant Cell Environ. 24(2): 227-235.
79. Zekri, M. 1984. Citrus water relations and growth under different irrigation treatments. MS thesis. Gainesville, Fla.: University of Florida.
80. Zekri, M., and L. R. Parsons. 1988. Water relations of grapefruit trees in response to drip, microsprinkler, and overhead sprinkler irrigation. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 113(6): 819-823.
81. _. 1989. Grapefruit leaf and fruit growth in response to drip, microsprinkler, and overhead sprinkler irrigation. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 114(1): 25-29.