Complaints against the police: A focus group study of citizen perceptions, goals, and expectations

Criminal Justice Review

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 207-226

  Walker, Samuel ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037583324     PISSN: 07340168     EISSN: 15563839     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/073401689702200205     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Adams, K. (1995). Measuring the prevalence of police abuse of force. In W. A. Geller & H. Toch (Eds.), And justice for all (pp. 61-97). Washington, DC: PERF.
2. American Civil Liberties Union. (1966). Police power and citizens' rights: The case for an independent police review board. New York, NY: Author.
3. American Civil Liberties Union. (1992). Fighting police misconduct: A' citizen's organizing manual. New York, NY: Author.
4. Americans For Effective Law Enforcement. (1982). Police civilian review boards (AELE Defense Manual Brief #82-3). San Francisco, CA: Author.
5. Black, D. (1976). The behavior of law. New York, NY: Academic Press.
6. Browning, S. L., Cullen, F. T., Cao, L., Kopache, R., & Stevenson, T. J. (1994). Race and getting hassled by the police: A research note. Police Studies, 17(1), 1-11.
7. Carter, D. (1985). Hispanic perceptions of police performance: An empirical assessment. Journal of Criminal Justice, 13(4), 487-500.
8. Christopher Commission. (1991). Report of the Independent Commission on the Los Angeles Police Department. Los Angeles, CA: City of Los Angeles.
9. Dilulio, J. J., Jr. (1990). Courts, corrections, and the Constitution. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
10. Dugan, J. R., & Breda, D. R. (1991). Complaints about police officers: A comparison among types and agencies. Journal of Criminal Justice, 19, 165-171.
11. Felstiner, W. L. F., Abel, R. L., & Sarat, A. (1980-1981). The emergence and transformation of disputes. Naming, blaming, claiming.Law and Society Review, 15(3-4), 631-654.
12. Goldsmith, A. J. (1991). Complaints against the police: The trend to external review. New York, NY: Clarendon Press.
13. Griswold, D. B. (1994). Complaints against the police: Predicting dispositions. Journal of Criminal Justice, 22(3), 215-221.
14. Hawkins, D. F. (1987). Beyond anomalies: Rethinking the conflict perspective on race and criminal punishment. Social Forces, 65, 719-745.
15. Herek, G. M., & Berrill, K. T. (1992). Hate crimes: Confronting violence against lesbians and gay men. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
16. Hill, L. B. (1981). Bureaucratic monitoring mechanisms. In C. T. Goodsell (Ed.), The public encounter (pp. 160-186). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University.
17. Huang, W. S. W., & Vaughn, M. S. (1996). Support and confidence: Attitudes toward the police. In T. J. Flanagan & D. R. Longmire (Eds.), Americans view crime and justice (pp. 31-45). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18. Hudson, J. R. (1972). Organizational aspects of internal and external review of the police. Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science, 63, 427-432.
19. International Association of Chiefs of Police. (1966, February). Police review boards. Police Chief, pp. 12-35.
20. Institute of Medicine. (1995). Real people, real problems. Washington, DC: Author.
21. Jolin, A. I., & Gibbons, D. C. (1984). Policing the police: The Portland experience. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 12, 315-322.
22. Kappeler, V. E., Kraska, P. B., & Marron, J. E. (1995, March). Police policing themselves: The processing of excessive force complaints. Paper presented at the meeting of the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences, Boston, MA.
23. Kerstetter, W. A. (1985). Who disciplines the police? Who should? In W. A. Geller (Ed.), Police leadership in America (pp. 149-182). Chicago, IL: American Bar Foundation.
24. Kerstetter, W. A., & Rasinski, K. A. (1994). Opening a window into police internal affairs: Impact of procedural justice reform on third-party attitudes. Social Justice Research, 7(2), 107-127.
25. Krueger, R. A. (1994). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
26. Light, P. C. (1993). Monitoring government. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
27. Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York, NY: Plenum.
28. Littlejohn, E. (1981). The civilian police commission: A deterrent of police misconduct. University of Detroit Journal of Urban Law, 59, 5-62.
29. Luna, E. (1994). Accountability to the community on the use of deadly force. Policing by Consent, 1, 4-6.
30. Minneapolis Civilian Police Review Authority. (1995). Annual report. Minneapolis, MN: City of Minneapolis.
31. National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders. (1968). 1968 report. New York, NY: Bantam Books.
32. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People. (1995). Beyond the Rodney King story: An investigation of police misconduct in minority communities. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
33. Pate, A. M., & Fridell, L. A. (1993). Police use of force: Official reports, citizen complaints, and legal consequences (Vols. 1-2). Washington, DC: The Police Foundation.
34. Perez, D. W. (1978). Police accountability: A question of balance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California at Berkeley.
35. Perez, D. W. (1994). Common sense about police review. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
36. Sherman, L. W., Gottfredson, D., MacKenzie, D., Eck, J., Reuter, P., & Bushway, S. (1997). Preventing crime. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
37. Sviridoff, M., & McElroy, J. E. (1988). Processing complaints against police: The civilian complaint review board. New York, NY: Vera Institute of Justice.
38. Sviridoff, M., & McElroy, J. E. (1989a). Processing complaints against police in New York City: The complainant's perspective. New York, NY: Vera Institute of Justice.
39. Sviridoff, M., & McElroy, J. E. (1989b). The processing of complaints against police in New York City: The perceptions and attitudes of line officers. New York, NY: Vera Institute of Justice.
40. Terrill, R. J. (1990). Alternative perceptions of independence in civilian oversight. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 17, 77-83.
41. Tyler, T. (1990). When people obey the law. New Haven, CT: Yale University.
42. U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. (1980). Police community relations in Omaha. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
43. U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. (1981). Who is guarding the guardians? A report of police practices. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
44. Walker, S. (1995, November). Rethinking the sustain rate: Notes on the proper standard for measuring the effectiveness of citizen review of the police. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Boston, MA.
45. Walker, S., & Bumphus, V. W. (1992). The effectiveness of civilian review: Observations on recent trends and new issues regarding the civilian review of the police. American Journal of Police, 11(4), 1-26.
46. Walker, S., & Kreisel, B. (1996). Varieties of citizen review: American Journal of Police, 15(3), 65-88.
47. Walker, S., & Luna, E. (1997). An evaluation of the oversight mechanisms of the Albuquerque Police Department. Albuquerque, NM: City Council.
48. Walker, S., Spohn, C., & DeLone, M. (1996). The color of justice. Belmont, WA: Wadsworth.
49. Walker, S., & Wright, B. (1995). Citizen review of the police 1994: A national survey. Washington, DC: PERF.
50. West, P. (1987). Police complaints procedures in the USA and in England and Wales: Historical and contemporary issues. Unpublished master's thesis, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan.
51. Westley, W. A. (1970). Violence and the police. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.