Association between subjective and objective measures of lip form and function: An exploratory analysis

Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 241-248

  Trotman, Carroll Ann ^a,c   Phillips, Ceib ^a   Faraway, Julian J ^b   Ritter, Kelly ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^d NONE

Author keywords

Cleft lip and palate; Lip movement; Scarring

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CLEFT LIP; CLEFT PALATE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FACIAL EXPRESSION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MOTION; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCAR FORMATION; SCHOOL CHILD; UPPER LIP; VELOCITY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CHILD; CICATRIX; CLEFT LIP; CLEFT PALATE; FEMALE; HUMANS; LIP; MALE; MAXILLOFACIAL DEVELOPMENT; MOVEMENT; OBSERVER VARIATION; PHOTOGRAPHY, DENTAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; VIDEO RECORDING;

EID: 0037566652     PISSN: 10556656     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1597/1545-1569(2003)040<0241:ABSAOM>2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Asher-McDade C, Roberts C, Shaw WC, Gallager C. Development of a method for rating nasolabial appearance in patients with clefts of the lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1991;38:385-390.
2. Broadbent BH Sr., Broadbent BH Jr., Golden WH. Bolton Standards of Dentofacial Developmental Growth. St. Louis: CV Mosby; 1975.
3. Coghlan BA, Matthews B, Pigott RW. A computer-based method of measuring facial asymmetry and facial attractiveness in patients with clefts of the lip and palate. Br J Plast Surg. 1987;40:371-376.
4. Hurwitz DJ, Ashby ER, Llull R, Pasqual J, Tabor C, Garrison L, Gillen J, Weyant R. Computer-assisted anthropometry for outcome assessment of cleft lip. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;103:1608-1623.
5. Marsh JL. When is enough enough? Secondary surgery for cleft lip and palate patients. Clin Plast Surg. 1990;17:37-47.
6. Méndez MC. A Three-Dimensional Analysis of Facial Movements in Normal Adults: Methodological Validation and Characterization of Natural Expressions Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan; 1999. Thesis.
7. Morrant DG, Shaw WC. Use of standardized video recordings to assess cleft surgery outcome. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1996;33:134-142.
8. Riolo ML, Moyers RE, McNamara JA Jr., Hunter WS. An Atlas of Craniofacial Growth: Cephalometric Standards From the University School Growth Study, The University of Michigan. Monograph 2. Ann Arbor, MI: Center for Human Growth and Development, University of Michigan; 1974.
9. Ritter K, Trotman C-A, Phillips C. Validity of subjective evaluations for the assessment of lip scarring and impairment. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2002;39:587-596.
10. Roberts-Harry DP, Evans R, Hawthorn I. Effects of different surgical regimes on nasal asymmetry and facial attractiveness in patients with clefts of the lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1991;28:274-278.
11. Trotman C-A, Faraway JJ. Sensitivity of a method for the analysis of facial mobility. II. Interlandmark separation. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1998a;35:142-153.
12. Trotman C-A, Faraway J, Essick G. Three-dimensional nasolabial displacement during movement in repaired cleft lip and palate patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105:1273-1283.
13. Trotman C-A, Faraway JJ, Silvester T, Greenlee GM, Johnston LE Jr. Sensitivity of a method for the analysis of facial mobility. I. Vector of displacement. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1998b;35:132-141.
14. Weeden JC, Trotman C-A, Faraway JJ. Three dimensional analysis of facial movement in normal adults: influence of sex and facial shape. Angle Orthod. 2001;71:132-140.