Hadronic parity violation and inelastic electron-deuteron scattering

Physical Review C - Nuclear Physics

Volumn 67, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 355011-3550113

  Liu, C P ^a   Prezeau G ^b   Ramsey Musolf, M J ^b,c,d  

^a TRIUMF   (Canada)

^b CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037565142     PISSN: 05562813     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.67.035501     Document Type: Review

References (30)

1. M.J. Musolf et al., Phys. Rep. 239, 1 (1994).
2. R.D. McKeown and M.J. Ramsey-Musolf, hep-ph/0203011.
3. B. Mueller et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3824 (1997).
4. D.T. Spayde et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 1106 (2000).
5. R. Hasty et al., Science 290, 2117 (2000).
6. S.L. Zhu et al., Phys. Rev. D 62, 033008 (2000).
7. M.J. Musolf and B.R. Holstein, Phys. Lett. B 242, 461 (1990).
8. W.-Y.P. Hwang and E.M. Henley, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 129, 47 (1980).
9. W.-Y.P. Hwang, E.M. Henley, and G.A. Miller, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 137, 378 (1981).
10. G. Küster and H. Arenhövel, Nucl. Phys. A626, 911 (1997).
11. T. de Forest, Jr. and J.D. Walecka, Adv. Phys. 15, 1 (1966).
12. J. D. Walecka, in Muon Physics, edited by V. W. Huges and C. S. Wu (Academic, New York, 1975), Vol. II.
13. B. Desplanques, J.F. Donoghue, and B.R. Holstein, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 124, 449 (1980).
14. E.G. Adelberger and W.C. Haxton, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 35, 501 (1985).
15. W. Haeberli and B. R. Holstein, in Symmetries and Fundamental Interactions in Nuclei, edited by W. C. Haxton and E. M. Henley (World Scientific, Singapore, 1995), p. 17.
16. W.C. Haxton, C.-P. Liu, and M.J. Ramsey-Musolf, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5247 (2001).
17. W.C. Haxton, C.-P. Liu, and M.J. Ramsey-Musolf, Phys. Rev. C 65, 045502 (2002).
18. A.J.F. Siegert, Phys. Rev. 52, 787 (1937).
19. J.L. Friar and S. Fallieros, Phys. Rev. C 29, 1645 (1984).
20. M. J. Musolf, Ph.D. thesis, Princeton Univsersity, 1989.
21. R.B. Wiringa, V.G.J. Stoks, and R. Schiavilla, Phys. Rev. C 51, 38 (1995).
22. J.M. Blatt and L.C. Biedenharn, Phys. Rev. 86, 399 (1952).
23. L. Diaconescu, R. Schiavilla, and U. van Kolck, Phys. Rev. C 63, 044007 (2000).
24. T. Ito (private communication).
25. H.P. Stapp, T.J. Ypsilantis, and N. Metropolis, Phys. Rev. 105, 302 (1957).
26. Current conservation also implies the presence of PV electromagnetic two-body current contributions, as we discuss below.
27. M is real.
28. 0.
29. The "nuclear bar" convention, defined in Ref. [25], is more commonly used in literature. However, the phase parameters of these two conventions are totally interchangeable. The reason for our choice is that all the wave functions are purely real in BB convention.
30. 2-dependence still governs the overall behavior.