Resolution-dependent quark masses from meson correlators

Physical Review C - Nuclear Physics

Volumn 67, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 352051-3520512

  Forkel, Hilmar ^a,b   Schwenzer, Kai ^a  

^a INSTITUT FÜR THEORETISCHE PHYSIK   (Germany)

^b RUHR UNIVERSITY BOCHUM   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037565141     PISSN: 05562813     EISSN: 1089490X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.67.035205     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. H. G. Dosch, T. Gousset and H. J. Pirner, Phys. Rev. D 57, 1666 (1998).
2. K. G. Wilson and J. B. Kogut, Phys. Rep. 12, 75 (1974).
3. J. Meyer, K. Schwenzer, H. J. Pirner, and A. Deandrea, Phys. Lett. B 526, 79 (2002); B. J. Schaefer and H. J. Pirner, Nucl. Phys. A660, 439 (1999).
4. J. Meyer, K. Schwenzer, H. J. Pirner, and A. Deandrea, Phys. Lett. B 526, 79 (2002); B. J. Schaefer and H. J. Pirner, Nucl. Phys. A660, 439 (1999).
5. J. Berges, D. U. Jungnickel, and C. Wetterich, Phys. Rev. D 59, 034010 (1999).
6. V. A. Novikov, M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainsthein, and V. I. Zakharov, Nucl. Phys. B191, 301 (1981).
7. E. V. Shuryak, Rev. Mod. Phys. 65, 1 (1993).
8. The RDQM approach is restricted to the spacelike momentum region of the correlators.
9. M. Shifman, in At the Frontier of Particle Physics, Handbook of QCD, edited by M. Shifman (World Scientific, Singapore, 2001), Vol. 3, pp. 1447-1494.
10. M.A. Shifman, A.I. Vainsthein, and V.I. Zakharov, Nucl. Phys. B147, 385 (1979).
11. 2).
12. 2.
13. M. C. Chu, J. M. Grandy, S. Huang, and J. W. Negele, Phys. Rev. D 48, 3340 (1993).
14. S. J. Hands, P. W. Stephenson, and A. McKerrell, UKQCD Collaboration, Phys. Rev. D 51, 6394 (1995).
15. Initially, we had included the cooled lattice data of Ref. [15] in our analysis, in the hope to delineate information about the role of instantons in generating the hadronic input parameters. It turned out, however, that the RDQM method cannot resolve significant differences between the cooled and uncooled data.
16. M. C. Chu, J. M. Grandy, S. Huang, and J. W. Negele, Phys. Rev. D 49, 6039 (1994).
17. We do not use the recent lattice data [17] from overlap fermions since those are restricted to relatively short distances, lack small-mass extrapolation and might be subject to rather large finite-size corrections [18].
18. T. DeGrand, Phys. Rev. D 64, 094508 (2001).
19. J. Negele (private communication).
20. E. V. Shuryak and J. J. Verbaarschot, Nucl. Phys. B410, 55 (1993).
21. D. E. Groom et al., Particle Data Group Collaboration, Eur. Phys. J. C 15, 1 (2000).
22. S. Coleman, Aspects of Symmetry (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1988).
23. c,i.
24. A somewhat stronger bound, given in the Appendix, can be established in the case of a unique solution.
25. Note that isospin-violating disconnected contributions could provide an exception to this rule in channels which carry vacuum quantum numbers.
26. In the vector channel, the differences between isoscalar and isovector correlators are less pronounced.
27. (v)(0) obtained in the ILM (see Table I). Similarly large constituent masses together with the absence of a chiral restoration transition are also found in the axial-vector channel (see below).
28. 0(980) resonance is commonly interpreted as a four-quark state and therefore not included in the phenomenological analysis of Ref. [6].
29. Recall that we only consider isovector interpolators.
30. 2.