Interplay between inelastic X-ray scattering and ab initio density-response calculations: Insight into the electronic correlations in aluminum

Physica Status Solidi (B) Basic Research

Volumn 237, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 280-288

  Tischler, J Z ^a   Larson, B C ^a   Zschack, P ^b   Fleszar, A ^c   Eguiluz, A G ^a,d  

^a OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037562972     PISSN: 03701972     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pssb.200301777     Document Type: Review

References (31)

1. J. C. Kimball, Phys. Rev. A 7, 1648 (1973).
2. P. Vashishta and K. S. Singwi, Phys. Rev. B 6, 875 (1972).
3. J. T. Devreese, F. Brosens, and L. F. Lemmens, Phys. Rev. B 21, 1349 (1980).
4. C. F. Richardson and N. W. Ashcroft, Phys. Rev. B 50, 8170 (1994).
5. S. Moroni, D. M. Ceperley, and G. Senatore, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 689 (1995).
6. F. Brosens, J. T. Devreese, and L. F. Lemmens, Phys. Rev. B 21, 1363 (1980).
7. Y.-H. Kim and A. Görling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 096402 (2002).
8. L. Reining, V. Olevano, A. Rubio, and G. Onida, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 066404 (2002).
9. I. V. Tokatly and O. Pankratov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 2078 (2001).
10. X. Gonze and M. Scheffler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 4416 (1999).
11. W. Schülke and U. Berg, phys. stat. sol. 23, K87 (1967).
12. W. Schülke, H. Nagasawa, S. Mourikis, and A. Kaprolat, Phys. Rev. B 40, 12215 (1989).
13. P. M. Platzman, E. D. Isaacs, H. Williams, P. Zschack, and G. E. Ice, Phys. Rev. B 46, 12943 (1992).
14. A. Fleszar, A. A. Quong, and A. G. Eguiluz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 590 (1995).
15. B. C. Larson, J. Z. Tischler, E. D. Isaacs, P. Zschack, A. Fleszar, and E. G. Eguiluz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 1346 (1996).
16. J. P. Hill, C.-C. Kao, W. A. C. Caliebe, D. Gibbs, and J. B. Hastings, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3665 (1996).
17. W. Schülke, J. R. Schmitz, H. Schulte-Schrepping, and A. Kaprolat, Phys. Rev. B 52, 11721 (1995).
18. A. G. Eguiluz, W. Ku, and J. M. Sullivan, J. Chem. Phys. Solids 61, 383 (2000).
19. G. Onida, L. Reining, and A. Rubio, Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 601 (2002).
20. For a timely, insightful review of the foundations and practical implementations of TDDFT, see N. T. Maitra, K. Burke, H. Appel, E. K. U. Gross, and R. van Leeuwen, in Reviews in Modern Quantum Chemistry: A Celebration of the Contributions of R. G. Parr, edited by K. D. Sen (World Scientific, Singapore, 2002). See also K. Burke and E. K. U. Gross, in Density Functional: Theory and Applications, edited by D. Joubert (Springer, Berlin, 1998), p. 116.
21. For a timely, insightful review of the foundations and practical implementations of TDDFT, see N. T. Maitra, K. Burke, H. Appel, E. K. U. Gross, and R. van Leeuwen, in Reviews in Modern Quantum Chemistry: A Celebration of the Contributions of R. G. Parr, edited by K. D. Sen (World Scientific, Singapore, 2002). See also K. Burke and E. K. U. Gross, in Density Functional: Theory and Applications, edited by D. Joubert (Springer, Berlin, 1998), p. 116.
22. E. Runge and E. K. U. Gross, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 2850 (1984).
23. P. Hohenberg and W. Kohn, Phys. Rev. 136, B864 (1964); W. Kohn and L. J. Sham, Phys. Rev. 140, A1133 (1965).
24. P. Hohenberg and W. Kohn, Phys. Rev. 136, B864 (1964); W. Kohn and L. J. Sham, Phys. Rev. 140, A1133 (1965).
25. R. van Leeuwen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 3863 (1999); Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 15, 1969 (2001).
26. R. van Leeuwen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 3863 (1999); Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 15, 1969 (2001).
27. G. D. Mahan, Many Particle Physics, 2nd ed. (Plenum, New York, 1990), Chapter 5.
28. M. Petersilka, U. J. Gossmann, and E. K. U. Gross, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 1212 (1996).
29. A. G. Eguiluz and W. Ku, in Electron Correlations and Materials Properties, edited by A. Gonis, N. Kioussis, and M. Ciftan (Kluwer-Plenum, N.Y., 1999), p. 329.
30. In particular, we stress that "self-energy shifts" should not be introduced in the Kohn-Sham response - even if that procedure were to yield apparent agreement with the data. Unfortunately, such uncontrolled approximation, particularly involving GW self-energy shifts, has become rather common in the literature.
31. B. C. Larson, J. Z. Tischler, A. Fleszar, and A. G. Eguiluz, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 61, 391 (2000).