Values - Truth and meaning

Psychologist

Volumn 15, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 296-299

  Maio, Gregory R ^a  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037561622     PISSN: 09528229     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Altemeyer, B. (1988). Enemies of freedom: Understanding right-wing authoritarianism. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
2. Batson, C.D., Schoenrade, P. & Ventis, W.L. (1993). Religion and the individual:A social-psychological perspective. New York: Oxford Press.
3. Bernard, M.M., Maio, G.R. & Olson, J.M. (2002). The vulnerability of values to attack: Inoculation of values and value-relevant attitudes. Manuscript submitted for publication.
4. Chaiken, S., Liberman,A. & Eagly,A.H. (1989). Heuristic and systematic processing within and beyond the persuasion context. In J.S. Uleman & J.A. Bargh (Eds.) Unintended thought (pp.212-252). New York: Guilford Press.
5. Darley,J.M. & Batson, C.D. (1973). From Jerusalem to Jericho: A study of situational and dispositional variables in helping behaviour. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27, 100-119.
6. Fish, S. (1999). The trouble with principle. London: Harvard University Press.
7. Forsyth, D.R. (1980). A taxonomy of ethical ideologies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 175-184.
8. Frondizi, R. (1971). What is value? La Salle, II: Open Court.
9. Katz, D. (1960).The functional approach to the study of attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly, 24, 163-204.
10. Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic, and political change in 43 societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
11. Katz, I. & Hass, R.G. (1988). Racialambivalence and American value conflict: Correlational and priming studies of dual cognitive structures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 893-905.
12. Kelman, H.C. (1974). Further thoughts on the process of compliance, identification, and internalization. In J.T. Tedeschi (Ed.) Perspectives on social power (pp. 125-171). Chicago, IL: Aldine.
13. Kristiansen, C.M. & Hotte,A.M. (1996). Morality and the self: Implications for the when and how of value-attitude-behaviour relations. In C. Seligman, J.M. Olson & M.P. Zanna (Eds.) The psychology of values: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 8, pp.77-106). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14. Maio, G.R. & Olson, J.M. (1998).Values as truisms: Evidence and implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 294-311.
15. Maio, G.R., Olson, J.M., Bernard, M. & Allen, L. (2001). Addressing discrepancies between values and behaviour: The motivating effect of reasons. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 104-117.
16. McGuire, W.J. (1964). Inducing resistance to persuasion: Some contemporary approaches. In L. Berkowltz (Ed.) Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 191-229). New York: Academic Press.
17. McGuire,W.J. & Papageorgis, D. (1961).The relative efficacy of various types of prior belief defense in producing immunity against persuasion, journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62, 327-337.
18. Petty, R.E. & Cacioppo, J.T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.) Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 123-205). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
19. Rescher, N. (1993). A system of pragmatic idealism; Vol. 2. The validity of values. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
20. Rokeach, M. (1960). The open and closed mind: Investigations into the nature of belief systems and personality systems. New York: Basic Books.
21. Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.
22. Scheier, M.F. & Carver, C.S. (1985). The self-consciousness scale: A revised version for use with general populations. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 15, 687-699.
23. Schein, E.H. (1956). The Chinese indoctrination program for prisoners of war: A study of attempted 'brainwashing.' Psychiatry, 19, 149-172.
24. Schwartz, S.H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests In 20 countries. In M.P. Zanna (Ed.) Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1-65). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
25. Schwartz, S.H. (1996).Value priorities and behaviour: Applying the theory of integrated value systems. In C. Seligman, J.M. Olson & M.P. Zanna (Eds.) The psychology of values: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 8, pp.1-24). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
26. Snyder, M. & Gangestad, S. (1986). On the nature of self-monitoring: Matters of assessment, matters of validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 125-139.
27. Tajfel, H. (1970). Experiments in intergroup discrimination. Scientific American, 223, 96-102.
28. Wilson, T.D., Dunn, D.S., Kraft, D. & Lisle, D.J. (1989). Introspection, attitude change, and attitude-behaviour consistency: The disruptive effects of explaining why we feel the way we do. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.) Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 22, pp.287-343). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
29. Wilson, T.D., Kraft, D. & Dunn, D.S. (1989). The disruptive effects of explaining attitudes:The moderating effect of knowledge about the attitude object. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 379-400.