Sampling variance of species identification in fisheries-acoustic surveys based on automated procedures associating acoustic images and trawl hauls

ICES Journal of Marine Science

Volumn 60, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 437-445

  Petitgas, Pierre ^a   Massé, Jacques ^a   Beillois, Pierre ^a   Lebarbier, Emilie ^a   Le Cann, Arnaud ^a  

^a IFREMER   (France)

Author keywords

Abundance; Acoustics; Image classification; School echo traces; Survey design; Variance

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC SURVEY; ECHO SOUNDER; FISH; FISHERY; IDENTIFICATION METHOD; SAMPLING;

EID: 0037561480     PISSN: 10543139     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1054-3139(03)00026-2     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Diner, N. 2001. Correction on school geometry and density: approach based on acoustic image simulation. Aquatic Living Resources, 14: 211-222.
2. Diner, N., and Marchand, P. 1995. Acoustique et PeÌche maritime. IFREMER, PlouzaneÌ. 147 pp.
3. Gerlotto, F. 1993. Identification and spatial stratification of tropical fish concentrations using acoustic populations. Aquatic Living Resources, 6: 243-254.
4. Hammond, T., and Swartzman, G. 2001. A general procedure for estimating the composition of school clusters using standard acoustic survey data. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 58: 1115-1132.
5. Haralabous, J., and Georgakarakos, S. 1996. Artificial neural networks as a tool for species identification of fish schools. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 53: 173-180.
6. ICES. 2000. Report on Echotrace Classification. Ed. by D. Reid. ICES Cooperative Research Report, No. 238. 107 pp.
7. Lawson, G., Barange, M., and FreÌon, P. 2001. Species identification of pelagic fish schools on the South African continental shelf using acoustic descriptors and ancillary information. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 58: 275-287.
8. Lebart, L., Morineau, A., and Piron, M. 1995. Statistique Exploratoire Multidimensionnelle. Dunod, Paris. 439 pp.
9. Lu, H., and Lee, K. 1995. Species identification of fish schools from echograms by an echo-signal image processing system. Fisheries Research, 24: 99-111.
10. MacLennan, D., and Simmonds, E. 1992. Fisheries Acoustics. Chapman and Hall, London. 325 pp.
11. Manly, B. 1997. Randomization Bootstrap and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology, 2nd edition. Chapman and Hall, London. 399 pp.
12. MasseÌ J. 1996. Acoustic observations in the Bay of Biscay: schooling, vertical distribution, species assemblages and behaviour. Scientia Marina, 60(Suppl. 2): 227-234.
13. MasseÌ J. 1988. Utilisation de l'eÌcho-inteÌgration en recherche halieutique. Document IFREMER, DRV 88030 RH, Nantes.
14. MasseÌ J., and RetieÌre, N. 1995. Effect of the number of transects and identification hauls on acoustic biomass estimates under mixed species conditions. Aquatic Living Resources, 8: 195-199.
15. MasseÌ J., and Rouxel, C. 1991. Improvement in acoustic assessments by discrimination of pelagic shoals with INES/MOVIES system. ICES CM 1991/B: 26.
16. Matheron, G. 1971. The theory of regionalised variables and their applications. Les Cahiers du Centre de Morphologie MatheÌmatique, Fascicule 5. Ecole Nationale SupeÌrieure des Mines de Paris, Paris. 212 pp.
17. Petitgas, P. 2000. On the clustering of fish schools at two scales and their relation with meso-scale physical structures. ICES CM 2000/K: 25.
18. Petitgas, P., and LeÌveÌnez, J. J. 1996. Spatial organisation of pelagic fish: echogram structure, spatio-temporal condition and biomass in Senegalese waters. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 53: 147-153.
19. Petitgas, P., Diner, N., Georgakarakos, S., Reid, D., Aukland, R., MasseÌ J., Scalabrin, C., Iglesias, M., Muino, R., and Carrera, P. 1998. Sensitivity analysis of school parameters to compare schools from different surveys: a review of the standardisation task of the EC FAIR CLUSTER program. ICES CM 1998/J: 23.
20. Reid, D., and Simmonds, E. 1993. Image analysis techniques for the study of fish school structure from acoustic survey data. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science, 50: 1264-1272.
21. Reid, D., Scalabrin, C., Petitgas, P., MasseÌ J., Aukland, R., Carrera, P., and Georgakarakos, S. 2000. Standard protocols for the analysis of school based data from echo sounder surveys. Fisheries Research, 47: 125-136.
22. Richards, L., Kieser, R., Milligan, T., and Candy, J. 1991. Classification of fish assemblages based on echo-integration surveys. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science, 48: 886-893.
23. Rose, G., and Leggett, W. 1988. Hydro-acoustic signal classification of fish schools by species. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science, 50: 597-604.
24. Scalabrin, C., and MasseÌ J. 1993. Acoustic detection of fish shoals in the Bay of Biscay. Aquatic Living Resources, 6: 269-283.
25. Scalabrin, C., Diner, N., Weill, A., Hillion, A., and Mouchot, M. 1996. Narrow band acoustic identification of mono specific fish shoals. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 53: 181-188.
26. Simmonds, E., Armstrong, F., and Copland, P. 1996. Species identification using a wide-band scatter with neural network and discriminant analysis. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 53: 189-195.
27. Weill, A., Scalabrin, C., and Diner, N. 1993. MOVIES-B: an acoustic detection description software: application to shoal species classification. Aquatic Living Resources, 6: 255-267.