Validation of the stochastic distorted-wave Born approximation model with broad bandwidth total target strength measurements of Antarctic krill

ICES Journal of Marine Science

Volumn 60, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 625-635

  Demer, David A ^a   Conti, Stéphane G ^a  

^a SOUTHWEST FISHERIES SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Antarctic krill; Broadband; Classification; Stochastic distorted wave Born approximation model; Total cross section; Total target strength

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC METHOD; BIOMASS; BROADBAND DATA; ESTIMATION METHOD; TARGET STRENGTH;

ANTARCTICA; LIVINGSTON ISLAND;

DECAPODA (CRUSTACEA); EUPHAUSIA; EUPHAUSIA SUPERBA; EUPHAUSIACEA;

EID: 0037561416     PISSN: 10543139     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1054-3139(03)00063-8     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Brierley, A. S., Ward, P., and Watkins, J. L. 1998. Acoustic discrimination of Southern Ocean zooplankton. Deep-Sea Research Part II, 45: 1155-1173.
2. CCAMLR. 1991. Report of the tenth meeting of the scientific committee, 21-25 October 1991. Committee for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources, 25 Old Wharf, Hobart, Tasmania 7000, Australia, SC-CAMLR-X.
3. Chu, D., Foote, K. G., and Stanton, T. K. 1993. Further analysis of target-strength measurements of Antarctic krill at 38 and 120 kHz: comparison with deformed-cylinder model and inference of orientation distribution. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 93: 2985-2988.
4. Demer, D. A. An estimate of error in the CCAMLR 2000 acoustical estimate of krill biomass. Deep-Sea Research Part II, CCAMLR 2000 Special Issue (in press).
5. Demer, D. A., and Conti, S. G. 2003. Reconciling theoretical versus empirical target strengths of krill; effects of phase variability on the distorted-wave Born approximation. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 60.
6. Demer, D. A., and Martin, L. V. 1995. Zooplankton target strength: volumetric or areal dependence? Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 98: 1111-1118.
7. Demer, D. A., Soule, M. A., and Hewitt, R. P. 1999. A multiple-frequency method for potentially improving the accuracy and precision of in situ target-strength measurements. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 105: 2359-2376.
8. Demer, D. A., Conti, S. G., De Rosny, J., and Roux, P. Absolute measurements of total target strength from reverberation in a cavity. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 113: 1387-1394.
9. De Rosny, J., and Roux, P. 2001. Multiple scattering in a reflecting cavity: application to fish counting in a tank. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109: 2587-2597.
10. Endo, Y. 1993. Orientation of Antarctic krill in an aquarium. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi, 59: 465-468.
11. Everson, I., Watkins, J. L., Bone, D. G., and Foote, K. G. 1990. Implications of a new acoustic target strength for abundance estimates of Antarctic krill. Nature, 345: 338-340.
12. Foote, K. G. 1990. Speed of sound in Euphausia superba. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 87: 1405-1408.
13. Foote, K. G., Everson, I., Watkins, J. L., and Bone, D. G. 1990. Target strengths of Antarctic krill Euphausia superba at 38 and 120 kHz. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 87: 16-24.
14. Greene, C. H., Stanton, T. K., Wiebe, P. H., and McClatchie, S. 1991. Acoustic estimates of Antarctic krill. Nature, 349: 110.
15. Greenlaw, C. F., and Johnson, R. K. 1983. Multiple-frequency acoustical estimation. Biological Oceanography, 2: 227-252.
16. Hewitt, R. P., and Demer, D. A. 1991. Krill abundance. Nature, 353: 310.
17. Hewitt, R. P., and Demer, D. A. 2000. The use of acoustic sampling to estimate the dispersion and abundance of euphausiids, with an emphasis on Antarctic krill, Euphausia superba. Fisheries Research, 47: 215-229.
18. Kils, U. 1981. The swimming behavior, swimming performance and energy balance of Antarctic krill, Euphausia superba. BIOMASS Scientific Series, 3: 122.
19. Lavery, A. C., Stanton, T. K., McGehee, D. E., and Chu, D. 2002. Three-dimensional modeling of acoustic backscattering from fluid-like zooplankton. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 111: 1197-1210.
20. Madureira, L. S. P., Ward, P., and Atkinson, A. 1998. Differences in backscattering strength determined at 120 and 38 kHz for three species of Antarctic macroplankton. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 93: 17-24.
21. Madureira, L. S. P., Everson, I., and Murphy, E. J. 1993. Interpretation of acoustic data at two frequencies to discriminate between Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba Dana) and other scatterers. Journal of Plankton Research, 15: 787-802.
22. Martin Traykovski, L. V., O'Driscoll, R. L., and McGehee, D. M. 1998. Effects of orientation on broadband acoustic scattering of Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba): implications for inverting zooplankton spectral-acoustic signatures for angle of orientation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 104: 2121-2135.
23. McGehee, D. E., O'Driscoll, R. L., and Martin Traykovski, L. V. 1998. Effects of orientation on acoustic scattering from Antarctic krill at 120 kHz. Deep-Sea Research Part II, 45: 1273-1294.
24. Morse, P. M., Ingard, K. U. 1968. Theoretical Acoustics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. 927 pp.
25. Ona, E. 1999. Methodology for target-strength measurements. ICES Cooperative Research Report, No. 235. 59 pp.
26. Simmonds, E. J., Armstrong, R., and Copland, P. J. 1996. Species identification using wideband backscatter with neural network and discriminant analysis. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 53: 189-196.
27. Wiebe, P. H., Greene, C. H., Stanton, T. K., and Burczynski, J. 1990. Sound scattering by live zooplankton and micronekton: empirical studies with a dual-beam acoustical system. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 88: 2346-2360.
28. Zakharia, M. E., Magand, F., Hetroit, F., and Diner, N. 1996. Wideband sounder for fish-species identification at sea. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 53: 203-208.