She said, he said. the influence of remedial accounts on third-party judgments of coworker sexual harassment

Journal of Management

Volumn 26, Issue 6, 2000, Pages 1133-1156

  Tata, Jasmine ^a  

^a LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037538889     PISSN: 01492063     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/014920630002600604     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Abbey A. Sex differences in attributions for friendly behavior Do males misperceive females' friendliness? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 42:1982;830-838.
2. Baker D.D., Terpstra D.E., Cutler B.D. Perceptions of sexual harassment A re-examination of gender differences . Journal of Psychology. 124:1990;409-416.
3. Baron R.A. Attributions and organizational conflict The mediating role of apparent sincerity . Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 41:1988;111-127.
4. Bem S.L. The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 41:1974;155-162.
5. Bies R.J. The predicament of injustice The management of moral outrage . Cummings L.L., Staw B.M. Research in organizational behavior Vol. 9 . 1987;289-319 JAI Press, Greenwich, CT.
6. Bies R.J., Shapiro D.L. Interaction fairness judgments The influence of causal accounts . Social Justice Research. 1:1987;199-218.
7. Bies R.J., Shapiro D., Cummings L.L. Causal accounts and managing conflict. Communication Research. 15:1988;381-399.
8. Bies R.J., Sitkin S.B. Explanation as legitimation Excuse-making in organizations . McLaughlin M.L., Cody M.J., Read S.J. Explaining one's self to others Reason-giving in a social context . 1992;183-198 Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
9. Blakely G.L., Blakely E.H., Moorman R.H. The relationship between gender, personal experience, and perceptions of sexual harassment in the workplace. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal. 8:1995;263-274.
10. Blumstein P.W., Carssow K.G., Hall J., Hawkins B., Hoffman R., Ishem E., Maurer C.P., Spens D., Taylor J., Zimmerman D.L. The honoring of accounts. American Sociological Review. 39:1974;551-566.
11. Brooks L., Perot A. Reporting sexual harassment. Psychology of Women Quarterly. 15:1991;31-47.
12. Buttny R. Social accountability in communication. 1993;Sage, London.
13. Cody M.J., McLaughlin M.L. Accounts on trial Oral arguments in traffic court . Antaki C. Analysing lay explanation A casebook of methods . 1988;113-126 Sage, London.
14. Cupach, W. R., Metts, S., & Hazelton, Jr., V. 1986. Coping with embarrassing predicaments: Remedial strategies and their perceived utility. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 5: 181-200.
15. Darby B.W., Schlenker B.R. Children's reactions to transgressions Effects of the actor's apology, reputation, and remorse . British Journal of Social Psychology. 28:1989;353-364.
16. DuBrin A.J. Sex and gender differences in tactics of influence. Psychological Reports. 68:1991;635-646.
17. Felstiner, W. L. F., Abel, R. L., & Sarat, A. (1981). The emergence and transformation of disputes: Naming, blaming, claiming. Law & Society Review, 15, 631-654.
18. Fincham, F. D., & Jaspars, J. M. 1980. Attribution of responsibility: From man the scientist to man the lawyer. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, 13, 81-138. New York: Academic Press.
19. Fiske S.T., Taylor S.E. Social cognition. 2nd Edition :1991;McGraw-Hill, New York.
20. Fitzgerald L.F. Sexual harassment Violence against women in the workplace . American Psychologist. 48:1993;1070-1076.
21. Fitzgerald L.F., Gelfand M.J., Drasgow F. Measuring sexual harassment Theoretical and psychometric advances . Basic and Applied Social Psychology. 17:1995;425-427.
22. Fitzgerald L.F., Ormerod A.J. Perceptions of sexual harassment The influence of gender and context . Psychology of Women Quarterly. 15:1991;281-294.
23. Forsyth D., Schlenker B., Leary M., McCown N. Self-presentational determinants of sex differences in leadership behavior. Small Group Behavior. 16:1985;197-210.
24. Goffman, E. 1971. Remedial interchanges. Relations in public: Micro-studies of the public order (pp. 95-187). New York: Harper & Row.
25. Gonzales M.H. A thousand pardons The effectiveness of verbal remedial tactics during account episodes . Journal of Language and Social Psychology. 11:1992;133-151.
26. Gonzales M.H., Manning D.J., Haugen J.A. Explaining our sins Influencing offender accounts and anticipated victim responses . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 62:1992;958-971.
27. Gonzales M.H., Pederson J.H., Manning D.J., Wetter D.W. Pardon my gaffe Effects of sex, status, and consequence severity on accounts . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 58:1990;610-621.
28. Gowan M.A., Zimmerman R.A. Impact of ethnicity, gender, and previous experience on juror judgments in sexual harassment cases. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 26:1996;596-617.
29. Greenberg, J. 1990. Looking fair vs. being fair: Managing impressions of organizational justice. In L. L. Cummings, & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior: Vol. 12 (pp. 111-157). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
30. Gutek B.A. Sex and the workplace. 1985;Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
31. Gutek, B. A. 1995. How subjective is sexual harassment? An examination of rater effects. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17: 447-467.
32. Gutek B.A., Cohen A.G., Konrad A.M. Predicting socio-sexual behavior at work A contact hypothesis . Academy of Management Journal. 33:1990;560-577.
33. Gutek B.A., Dunwoody V. Understanding sex and the workplace. Stromberg A.H., Lawrood L., Gutek B.A. Women and work An annual review, Vol. 2 . 1987;249-269 Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
34. Gutek B.A., O'Connor M. The empirical basis for the reasonable woman standard. Journal of Social Issues. 51:1995;151-166.
35. Hale C.L. A comparison of accounts When is a failure not a failure? Journal of Language and Social Psychology. 66:1987;117-132.
36. Hames D.S. Disciplining sexual harassers What's fair? Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal. 7:1994;207-217.
37. Hauck V.E. Arbitrating sexual harassment cases. 1995;Bureau of National Affairs, Washington, DC.
38. Heider F. The psychology of interpersonal relations. 1958;Wiley, New York.
39. Hesson-McInnis M.S., Fitzgerald L.F. Sexual harassment A preliminary test of an integrative model . Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 27:1997;877-901.
40. Hunter C., McClelland K. Honoring accounts for sexual harassment A factorial survey analysis . Sex Roles. 24:1991;725-752.
41. Johnson T.E., Rule B.G. Mitigating circumstance information, censure, and aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 50:1986;537-542.
42. Jones T.S., Remland M.S., Brunner C.C. Effects of employment relationship, response of recipient and sex of rater on perceptions of sexual harassment. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 65:1987;55-63.
43. Kim M., Wilson S.R. A cross-cultural comparison of implicit theories of requesting. Communication Monographs. 61:1994;210-235.
44. Kirk R.E. Experimental design. Procedures for the behavioral sciences. 3rd edition :1995;Brooks/Cole, Belmont, CA.
45. Lind E.A., Tyler T.R. The social psychology of procedural justice. 1988;Plenum Press, New York.
46. McLaughlin M.L., Cody M.J., French K. Account-giving and the attribution of responsibility Impressions of traffic offenders . Cody M.J., McLaughlin M.L. The psychology of tactical communication. 1990;244-267 Multilingual Matters, Clevedon, England.
47. McLaughlin M.L., Cody M.J., O'Hair H.D. The management of failure events Some contextual determinants of accounting behavior . Human Communication Research. 9:1983;208-224.
48. McLaughlin M.L., Cody M.J., Rosenstein N.E. Account sequences in conversation between strangers. Communication Monographs. 50:1983;102-125.
49. Ohbuchi K., Kameda M., Agarie N. Apology as aggression control Its role in mediating appraisal of and response to harm . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 56:1989;219-227.
50. Pedhazur E.J., Schmelkin L.P. Measurement, design, and analysis An integrated approach . 1991;Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
51. Powell G.N. Women and men in management. 2nd edition :1993;Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
52. Pryor J.B. The lay person's understanding of sexual harassment. Sex Roles. 13:1985;273-286.
53. Pryor J.B., Day J.D. Interpretations of sexual harassment An attributional analysis . Sex Roles. 18:1988;405-417.
54. Riger S. Gender dilemmas in sexual harassment policies and procedures. American Psychologist. 46:1991;497-505.
55. Riordan C.A., Marlin N.A., Kellogg R.T. The effectiveness of accounts following transgression. Social Psychology Quarterly. 96:1983;213-219.
56. Schlenker B.R. Impression management The self-concept, social identity and interpersonal relations . 1980;Brooks/Cole, Monterey, CA.
57. Schneider B.E. Consciousness about sexual harassment among heterosexual and lesbian women workers. Journal of Social Issues. 38:1982;75-98.
58. Schneider K.T., Swan S., Fitzgerald L.F. Job-related and psychological effects of sexual harassment in the workplace Empirical evidence from two organizations . Journal of Applied Psychology. 82:1997;401-415.
59. Schonbach P. A category system for account phases. European Journal of Social Psychology. 10:1980;195-200.
60. Schonbach P. Account episodes The management or escalation of conflict . 1990;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
61. Scott M.R., Lyman S.M. Accounts. American Sociological Review. 33:1968;46-62.
62. Shapiro D. The effects of explanations on negative reactions to deceit. Administrative Science Quarterly. 36:1991;614-630.
63. Shapiro D.L., Buttner E.H., Barry B. Explanations for rejection decisions What factors enhance their perceived adequacy and moderate their enhancement of justice perceptions? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 58:1994;346-368.
64. Tata J. The structure and phenomenon of sexual harassment Impact of category of sexually harassing behavior, gender, and hierarchical level . Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 23:1993;199-211.
65. Terpstra, D. E. 1989. Who gets sexually harassed? Personnel Administrator, 34(3), 84-88.
66. Terpstra D.E., Cook S.E. Complainant characteristics and reported behaviors and consequences associated with formal sexual harassment charges. Personnel Psychology. 38:1985;559-574.
67. Tetlock P.E. Accountability A social check on the fundamental attribution error . Social Psychology Quarterly. 48:1985;227-236.
68. Till F.J. Sexual Harassment A report on the sexual harassment of students . 1980;National Advisory Council on Women's Educational Programs, Washington, DC.
69. Wilcox R.R. New statistical procedures for the social sciences. 1987;Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
70. Williams C.W., Brown R.S., Lees-Haley P.R., Price J.R. An attributional (causal dimensional) analysis of perceptions of sexual harassment. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 25:1995;1169-1183.
71. Wood R.E., Mitchell T.R. Manager behavior in a social context The impact of impression management on attributions and disciplinary actions . Organizational Behavior and Human Performance. 28:1981;356-378.
72. York K.M. Defining sexual harassment in workplaces A policy-capturing approach . Academy of Management Journal. 32:(4):1989;830-850.