Binocular rivalry and perceptual multi-stability

Trends in Neurosciences

Volumn 26, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 289-291

  Rubin, Nava ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BINOCULAR VISION; BRAIN DEVELOPMENT; DYNAMICS; EYE; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHORT SURVEY; THEORY; VISION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 0037533815     PISSN: 01662236     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0166-2236(03)00128-0     Document Type: Short Survey

References (20)

1. Levelt W.J.M. On Binocular Rivalry. 1965;Institute for Perception RVO-TNO, Soesterberg, The Netherlands.
2. Borsellino A., et al. Reversal time distribution in the perception of visual ambiguous stimuli. Kybernetik. 10:1972;139-144.
3. Rubin, E. (1921) Visuell wahrgenommene Figuren, Gyldendals, Copenhagen. [Partial version in English in: Rubin, E. (2001) Figure and Ground. In Visual perception: essential readings (Yantis, S., ed.), Psychology Press.].
4. Wallach, H. (1935) Uber visuell wahrgenommene Bewegungsrichtung. Psychol. Forschung 20, 325-380 [English translation in: Wuerger, S. et al. (1996) 'On the visually perceived direction of motion' by Hans Wallach: 60 years later. Perception 25, 1317-1367.].
5. Hupé J.M., Rubin N. The dynamics of bi-stable alternation in ambiguous motion displays: a fresh look at plaids. Vision Res. 43:2003;531-548.
6. Gibson J.J. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. 1979;Houghton Mifflin.
7. Suzuki S., Grabowecky M. Evidence for perceptual 'trapping' and adaptation in multistable binocular rivalry. Neuron. 36:2002;143-157.
8. Diaz-Caneja, E. (1928) Sur l'alternance binoculaire [On binocular alternation], Annal. Ocul. 165, 721-731 [English translation in: Alais, D. et al. (2000) On binocular alternation (translation of Diaz-Caneja, 1928) Perception 29, 1437-1445.].
9. Kovacs I., et al. When the brain changes its mind: interocular grouping during binocular rivalry. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93:1996;15508-15511.
10. Hopfield J.J. Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 79:1982;2554-2558.
11. Amit D.J. Modelling Brain Function: the World of Attractor Neural Networks. 1989;Cambridge University Press.
12. Hertz J., et al. Introduction to the Theory of Neural Computation. 1991;Addison-Wesley.
13. Bialek W., DeWeese M. Random switching and optimal processing in the perception of ambiguous signals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 74:1995;3077-3080.
14. Dayan P. A hierarchical model of binocular rivalry. Neural Comput. 10:1998;1119-1135.
15. Lehky S.R. An astable multivibrator model of binocular rivalry. Perception. 17:1988;215-228.
16. Blake R. A neural theory of binocular rivalry. Psychol. Rev. 96:1989;145-167.
17. Mueller T.J. A physiological model of binocular rivalry. Vis. Neurosci. 4:1990;63-73.
18. Kalarickal G.J., Marshall J.A. Neural model of temporal and stochastic properties of binocular rivalry. Neurocomputing. 32-33:2000;843-853.
19. Laing C.R., Chow C.C. A spiking neuron model for binocular rivalry. J. Comput. Neurosci. 12:2002;39-53.
20. Blake R., Logothetis N.K. Visual competition. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 3:2002;13-21.