Preference similarities and group hegemony: G-7 voting cohesion in the UN general assembly;Podobnosti preferenc in skupinska hegemonija: Glasovalna kohezija skupine G 7 v generalni skupščini Združenib narodov

Journal of International Relations and Development

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 51-70

  Volgy, Thomas J ^a   Frazier, Derrick V ^a   Ingersoll, Robert Stewart ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

Capabilities; Cohesiveness; Factor analysis; General Assembly (GA); Global governance; Group of Seven (G 7); Hegemony; International politics

Indexed keywords

G-7 COUNTRY; HEGEMONY; POLITICAL RELATIONS; UNITED NATIONS;

EID: 0037533741     PISSN: 14086980     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. ALGER, Chadwick F. (1963) United Nations Participation as a Learning Experience. Public Opinion. Quarterly 17(3), 411-26.
2. ALGER, Chadwick, F. (1965) Personal Contact in Intergovernmental Organization. In Herbert KELMAN (ed.) International Behaviour: A Social-Psychological Analysis, 165-79. New York: Holt, Rhinehart and Winston.
3. BAILIN, Alison (1997) The Global Company Town: An Alternative Perspective of Hegemony, the Liberal Economic Order, and the Core-Peripbery Gap. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona, Ph.D. Dissertation.
4. BAILIN, Alison (2003) From Traditional to Group Hegemony: Liberal Economic Order and the Core-Peripbery Gap. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
5. BERGSTEN, Fred (2000) Toward a Tripartite World. The Economist (13 July), 23-6.
6. BUENO DE MESQUITA, Bruce (2000) Principles of International Politics. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
7. COHEN, Roger (1997) French Scoff at US Protest Over Gas Deal With Iran. New York Times (30 September), AI.
8. COHEN, Roger (1999) Uncomfortable with Dependence on US, Europe Aims for New Parity. New York Times (15 June), AI.
9. DIEHL, Paul F. (2001) The Politics Of International Organizations: Patterns And Insights. 2nd edition. Chicago, IL: Dorsey Press.
10. ERLANGER, Steven (1997) Yeltsin Basks at Summit: Some Europeans Are Cool to US. New York Times (21 June), A6.
11. ERLANGER, Steven (2002) For NATO, Little is Sure Now but Growth. New York Times (19 May), A8.
12. GINSBERG, Roy H. (2001) The European Union in International Politics. Boston, MA: Rowman and Littlefield.
13. HOLLOWAY, Steven (1990) Forty Years of United Nations General Assembly Voting. Canadian Journal of Political Science 23(2), 279-96.
14. IIDA, Keisuke (1988) Third World Solidarity: The Group of 77 in the UN General Assembly. International Organization 42(2), 375-95.
15. IKENBERRY, John G. (2001) After Victory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
16. MARÍN-BOSCH, Miguel (1987) How Nations Vote in the General Assembly of the United Nations. International Organization 41(4), 705-24.
17. MARÍN-BOSCH, Miguel (1998) Votes in the UN General Assembly. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
18. MARTIN, Lisa L. and Beth A. SIMMONS (1998) Theories and Empirical Studies of International Institutions. International Organization 52(4), 729-57.
19. PETERSON, M.J. (1986) The General Assembly in World Politics. Boston, MA: Allen and Unwin.
20. POWERS, Richard J. (1980) United Nations Voting Alignments: A New Equilibrium. Western Political Quarterly 33(2), 167-84.
21. PRESTON, Julia (2003) New Configuration of Security Council May Force US to Renew Lobbying Over Iraq. New York Times (5 January), 10.
22. RIGGS, Robert E. and Jack C. PLANO (1986) The United Nations: International Organization and World Politics. Chicago, IL: Dorsey Press.
23. RIGGS, Robert E., Karen FESTE, Mary HEINZ, Barry HUGHES, and Thomas J. VOLGY (1970) Behavioralism in the Study of the United Nations. World Politics 22(2), 197-236.
24. RISSE-KAPPEN, Thomas (1995) Ideas Do Not Float Freely: Transnational Coalitions, Domestic Structures, and the End of the Cold War. In Richard Ned LEBOW and Thomas RISSE-KAPPEN (eds) International Relations Theory and the End of the Cold War, 187-222. New York: Columbia University Press.
25. ROCHESTER, Martin J. (1986) The Rise and Fall of International Organization as a Field of Study. International Organization 40(4), 777-813.
26. RUSSETT, Bruce and Soo Yeon KIM (1996) The New Politics of Voting Alignments in the UN General Assembly International Organization 50(3), 629-52
27. SCIOLINO, Elaine (2002) France and America, Perfect Together. New York Times (10 November), 14.
28. SPIEZIO, Edward K. (1990) British Hegemony and Major Power War, 1815-1939: An Empirical Test of Gilpin's Model of Hegemonic Governance. International Studies Quarterly 34(2), 165-81.
29. STRANGE, Susan (1989) Toward a Theory of Transnational Empire. In Ernst Otto CZEMPIEL and James N. ROSENAU (eds) Global Changes and Theoretical Challenges: Approaches to World Politics for the 1990's, 161-76. Lexington, KY: Lexington Books.
30. The Economist (2002a) Dangerous Activities. The Economist (11 May), 63-6.
31. The Economist (2002b) Anti-Semitism in Europe: Is it Really Rising? The Economist (2 May), 39-40.
32. TOMLIN, Brian W. (1985) Measurement Validation: Lessons from the Use and Misuse of UN General Assembly Roll-call Votes. International Organitation 39(1), 189-206.
33. VOETEN, Erik (2000) Clashes in the Assembly International Organization 54(2), 185-215.
34. VOLGY, Thomas J. and Alison BAILIN (2002) International Politics and State Strength: Global Architectural Construction in the New World Order. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
35. VOLGY, Thomas J. and Lawrence E. IMWALLE (1995) Hegemonic Perspectives on the New World Order. American Journal of Political Science 39(4), 819-34.
36. VOLGY, Thomas J. and Lawrence E. IMWALLE (2000) The Two Faces of Hegemonic Strength: Structural versus Relational Capabilities and Global Architectural Construction. International Interactions 26(2), 229-51.
37. WANG, T. Y. (1999) US Foreign Aid and UN Voting: An Analysis of Important Issues. International Studies Quarterly 43(1), 199-210.
38. ZHDANNIKOV, Dmitry (2000) Russia to Warn G8 Energy Meeting to Treat it as Equal. Reuters (26 April), 6.