The role of industry in the implantation and follow-up of devices: A practitioner's perspective

Cardiac Electrophysiology Review

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 58-59

  Hayes, John J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Defibrillators; Industry; Pacemakers; Policy

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; FOLLOW UP; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICE; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEART ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; HEART RHYTHM; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; MEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION; PATIENT CARE; PHYSICIAN; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; QUALITY CONTROL; TRAINING;

ALLIED HEALTH OCCUPATIONS; ARRHYTHMIA; DEFIBRILLATORS, IMPLANTABLE; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; HUMANS; INDUSTRY; PACEMAKER, ARTIFICIAL; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; TIME FACTORS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0037533025     PISSN: 13852264     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1023695124312     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Fye WB. Cardiology and technology: An enduring and energizing partnership. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;40:1192-1195.
2. Murphy EK. The presence of sales representatives in the OR. AORN J 2001;73:822-824.
3. Statement on health care industry representatives in the operating room. Bull Am Coll Surg 2000;85:31-32.
4. Fox VJ, Duffy WJ, Conner R. Applying the health care industry representative statement to your setting. AORN J 2000;72:266-273.
5. Hayes JJ, Juknavorian R, Maloney JD. The role(s) of the industry employed allied professional. PACE 2001;24:398-399.