Substrate effects on the bioeroding demosponge Cliona orientalis. 2. Susbtrate colonisation and tissue growth

Marine Ecology

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 59-74

  Schönberg, Christine H L ^a  

^a AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF MARINE SCIENCE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Cliona orientalis; Coral architecture; Density; Growth; Penetration; Porifera; Porosity; Substrate

Indexed keywords

BIOEROSION; COLONIZATION; GROWTH RATE; POROSITY; SPONGE; SUBSTRATE PREFERENCE;

AUSTRALIA;

ANTHOZOA; ASTREOPORA; ASTREOPORA LISTERI; BIVALVIA; CLIONA; CYPHASTREA SERAILIA; FAVIA; FAVIA PALLIDA; FAVITES; FAVITES HALICORA; GONIASTREA; GONIASTREA RETIFORMIS; GONIOPORA; GONIOPORA TENUIDENS; PORIFERA; PORITES; TRIDACNA; TRIDACNA SQUAMOSA;

EID: 0037531499     PISSN: 01739565     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1439-0485.2003.03812.x     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. rd Sponge Conf. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.: 358-366.
2. Bak, R. P. M., 1976: The growth of coral colonies and the importance of crustose coralline algae and borrowing sponges in relation with carbonate accumulation. Netherl. J. Sea Res., 10: 285-337.
3. Bergman, K. M., 1983: The distribution and ecological significance of the boring sponge Cliona viridis on the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. M.Sc. Thesis, McMaster University, Hamilton; 69 pp.
4. Bromley, R. G. & A. D'Alessandro, 1984: The ichnogenus Entobia from the Miocene, Pliocene and Pleistocene of Southern Italy. Riv. Ital. Paleontol. Stratigr., 90: 227-296.
5. Carballo, J. L., S. A. Naranjo & J. C. García-Gomez. 1996: Use of marine sponges as stress indicators in marine ecosystems at Algeciras Bay (southern Iberian Peninsula). Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 135: 109-122.
6. Carballo, J. L., J. E. Sanchez-Moyano & J. C. García-Gomez, 1994: Taxonomic and ecological remarks on boring sponges (Clionidae) from the Straits of Gibraltar (southern Spain): tentative bioindicators? Zool. J. Linn, Soc., 112: 407-424.
7. Carter, J. G., 1980: Environmental and biological controls of bivalve shell mineralogy and microstructure. In: D. C. Rhoads & R. A. Lutz (Eds.). Skeletal growth of aquatic organisms. Biological records of environmental change. Plenum Press. New York: 69-113.
8. Chazottes, V., T. Le Campion-Alsumard & M. Peyrot-Clausade, 1995: Bioerosion rates on coral reefs: interactions between macroborers, microborers and grazers (Moorea, French Polynesia). Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol., 113: 189-198.
9. Cobb, W. R.. 1969: Penetration of calcium carbonate substrates by the boring sponge, Cliona. Am. Zool., 9: 783-790.
10. Cobb, W. R., 1975: Fine structural features of destruction of calcareous substrata by the burrowing sponge Cliona celata. Trans. Am. Microscop. Soc., 94: 197-202.
11. Edinger, E. N. & M. J. Risk, 1997: Sponge borehole size as a relative measure of bioerosion and palaeoproductivity. Lethaia, 29: 275-286.
12. Groot, R. A. de, 1977: Boring sponges (Clionidae) and their trace fossils from the coast near Rovinj (Yugoslavia). Geol. Mijnbouw., 56: 168-181.
13. Guida, V. G., 1976: Sponge predation in the oyster reef community as demonstrated with Cliona celata Grant. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol., 25: 109-122.
14. Hartman, W. D., 1957: Ecological niche differentiation in the boring sponges (Clionidae). Evolution, 11: 294-297.
15. Hartman, W. D., 1958: Natural history of the marine sponges of southern New England. Bull. Peabody Mus. Nat. Hist., 12: 1-150.
16. Highsmith, R. C., 1981: Coral bioerosion: damage relative to skeletal density. Am. Nat., 117: 193-198.
17. Hill, M. S., 1996: Symbiotic zooxanthellae enhance boring and growth rates of the tropical sponge Anthosigmella varians forma varians. Mar. Biol., 125: 649-654.
18. Hill, M. S., 1999: Morphological and genetic examination of phenotypic variability in the tropical sponge Anthosigmella varians. Mem. Queensl. Mus., 44: 239-247.
19. Hoeksema, B. W., 1983: Excavation patterns and spiculae dimensions of the boring sponge Cliona celata from the SW Netherlands. Senckenbergiana marit., 15: 55-85.
20. Holmes, K. E., E. N. Edinger, Hariyadi, G. V. Limmon & M. J. Risk, 2000: Bioerosion of live massive corals and branching coral rubble on Indonesian coral reefs. Mar. Pollut. Bull., 40: 606-617.
21. Hopkins, S. H., 1956a: Notes on the boring sponges in Gulf Coast estuaries and their relation to salinity. Bull. Mar. Sci. Gulf Caribb., 6: 44-58.
22. Hopkins, S. H., 1956b: The boring sponges which attack South Carolina oysters, with notes on some associated organisms. Contrib. Bears Bluff Lab., 23: 1-30.
23. Hopkins, S. H., 1962: Distribution of species of Cliona (boring sponge) on the eastern shore of Virginia in relation to salinity. Chesapeake Sci., 3: 121-124.
24. Mao Che, L., T. Le Campion-Alsumard, N. Boury-Esnault, C. Payri, S. Golubic & C. Bézac, 1996: Biodegradation of shells of the black pearl oyster. Pinctada margaritifera var. cumingii, by microborers and sponges of French Polynesia. Mar. Biol., 126: 509-519.
25. McCloskey, L. R.. 1970: The dynamics of the community associated with marine scleractinian coral. Int. Rev. ges. Hydrobiol. Hydrogr., 55: 13-81.
26. Nassonov, N., 1883: Zur Biologie und Anatomie der Clione. Z. wiss. Zool., 39: 295-308.
27. Nassonov, N., 1924: Sur l'éponge perforante Clione stationis Nason. Et le procédé du creusement des galeries dans les valves des huîtres, C. R. Acad. Sci. URSS. Ser. A. 1924: 113-115.
28. Neumann, A. C., 1966: Observations on coastal erosion in Bermuda and measurements of the boring rate of the sponge, Cliona lampa. Limnol. Oceanogr., 11: 92-108.
29. Old, M., 1942: The boring sponges and their effect on shellfish culture. Convention Papers. Annu. Rep. Natl Shellfish Assoc., Philadelphia: 1-3.
30. Pang, R. K., 1973: The ecology of some Jamaican excavating sponges. Bull. Mar. Sci., 23: 227-243.
31. Pomponi, S., 1980: Cytological mechanisms of calcium carbonate excavation by boring sponges. Int. Rev. Cytol., 65: 301-319.
32. Reaka-Kudla, M. L., J. S. Feingold & P. W. Glynn, 1996: Experimental studies of rapid bioerosion of coral reefs in the Galápagos Islands. Coral Reefs., 15: 101-107.
33. Risk, M. J. & J. K. MacGeachy, 1978: Aspects of bioerosion of modern Caribbean reefs. Rev. Biol. Trup., 26: (Suppl. 1): 85-105.
34. Rosell, D., 1994: Morphological and ecological relationships of two clionid sponges. Ophelia, 40: 37-50,
35. Rosell, D. & M. J. Uriz, 1992: Do associated zooxanthellae and the nature of the substratum affect survival, attachment and growth of Cliona viridis (Porifera: Hadromerida)? An experimental approach. Mar. Biol., 114: 503-507.
36. Resell, D. & M. J. Uriz, 2002: Excavating and endolithic sponge species (Porifera) from the Mediterranean: species descriptions and identification key. Org. Divers. Evol., 2: 55-86.
37. Rützler, K., 1975: The role of burrowing sponges in bioerosion. Oecologia, 19: 203-216.
38. Sarà, M., 1961: Zonazione dei Poriferi nella grotta della 'Gaiola'. Ann. Ist. Mus. Zool. Univ. Napoli. 13: 1-32.
39. Schönberg, C. H. L., 2000: Bioeroding sponges common to the Central Australian Great Barrier Reef: descriptions of three new species, two new records, and additions to two previously described species. Senckenbergiana marit., 30: 161-221.
40. Schönberg, C. H. L., 2001a: Small-scale distribution of Great Barrier Reef bioeroding sponges in shallow water. Ophelia, 55: 39-54.
41. Schönberg, C. H. L., 2001b: Estimating the extent of endolithic tissue of a Great Barrier Reef clionid sponge. Senckenbergiana marit., 31(l): 29-39.
42. Schönberg, C. H. L., 2002: Substrate effects on the bioeroding demosponge Cliona orientalis. 1. Bioerosion rates. P.S.Z.N.: Marine Ecology, 23(4): 313-326.
43. Schönberg, C. H. L. & C. R. Wilkinson, 2001: Induced colonization of Great Barrier Reef corals by a clionid bioeroding sponge. Coral Reefs, 20: 69-76.
44. Scott, P. J. B. & M. J. Risk. 1988: The effect of Lithophaga (Bivalvia: Mytilidae) boreholes on the strength of the coral Porites lobata. Coral Reefs, 7: 145-151.
45. Thiele, J., 1900: Kieselschwämme von Ternate 1. Abh. Senckenb. Naturforsch. Ges., 25: 19-80.
46. Uriz, M. J., D. Rosell & D. Martin, 1992: The sponge population of the Cabrera Archipelago (Balearic Islands): characteristics, distribution, and abundance of the most representative species. P.S.Z.N. I: Marine Ecology, 13: 101-117.
47. th Int. Coral Reef Symp., Manila, 2: 713-719.
48. Vicente, V. P., 1978: An ecological evaluation of the West Indian demosponge Anthosigmella varians. Bull. Mar. Sci., 28: 771-777.
49. Volz, P., 1939: Die Bohrschwämme (Clioniden) der Adria. Thalassia, 3: 1-64.
50. Warburton, F. E., 1958: The manner in which the sponge Cliona bores in calcareous objects. Can. J. Zool., 36: 555-562.
51. Warburton, F. E., 1966: The behavior of sponge larvae. Ecology, 47: 672-674.
52. Ward, P. & M. J. Risk, 1977: Boring pattern of the sponge Cliona vermifera in the coral Montastrea annularis. J. Paleontol., 51: 520-526.
53. Wells, J. W., 1956: Scleractinia, In: R. C. Moore (Ed.), Treatise on invertebrate palaeontology. Part F. Coelenterata. University of Kansas Press, Lawrence: 328-444.