REML and ML estimation for clustered grouped survival data

Statistics in Medicine

Volumn 22, Issue 12, 2003, Pages 2025-2034

  Lam, K F ^a   Ip, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Clustered grouped survival data; Intracluster correlation; Residual maximum likelihood; Shared random effect

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; BLINDNESS; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; CLINICAL RESEARCH; CLINICAL TRIAL; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DATA ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; DIABETES MELLITUS; DIABETIC RETINOPATHY; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; HUMAN; LASER COAGULATION; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD METHOD; METHODOLOGY; PATIENT MONITORING; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RATING SCALE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL; SURVIVAL; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; DIABETIC RETINOPATHY; HUMANS; LASER COAGULATION; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 0037529418     PISSN: 02776715     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sim.1323     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Cox DR. Regression models and life-tables (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 1972; 34:187-220.
2. Klein JP. Semiparametric estimation of random effects using the Cox model based on the EM algorithm. Biometrics 1992; 48:795-806.
3. Lam KF, Kuk AYC. A marginal likelihood approach to estimation in frailty models. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1997; 92:985-990.
4. Liang KY, Self SG, Chang YC. Modeling marginal hazards in multivariate failure time data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 1993; 55:441-453.
5. Lin DY. Cox regression analysis of multivariate failure time data: the marginal approach. Statistics in Medicine 1994; 13:2233-2247.
6. McGilchrist CA. REML estimation for survival models with frailty. Biometrics 1993; 49:221-225.
7. Prentice RL, Gloeckler LA. Regression analysis of grouped survival data with application to breast cancer data. Biometrics 1978; 34:57-67.
8. Huster WJ, Brookmeyer R, Self SG. Modeling paired survival data with covariates. Biometrics 1989; 45: 145-156.
9. Ross EA, Moore D. Modeling clustered, discrete, or grouped time survival data with covariates. Biometrics 1999; 55:813-819.
10. McGilchrist CA. Estimation in generalized mixed models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 1994; 56:61-69.
11. Henderson CR. Best linear unbiased estimation and prediction under a selected model. Biometrics 1975; 31: 423-447.
12. Diggle PJ, Liang KY, Zeger SL. Analysis of Longitudinal Data. Oxford University Press: New York, 1994.
13. Lindeboom M, Van Den Berg GJ. Heterogeneity in models for bivariate survival: the importance of the mixing distribution. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 1994; 56:49-60.
14. Neuhaus JM, Hauck WW, Kalbfleisch JD. The effects of mixture distribution misspecification when fitting mixed-effects logistic models. Biometrika 1992; 79:755-762.
15. Lam KF, Lee YW, Leung TL. Modeling multivariate survival data by a semi-parametric random effects proportional odds model. Biometrics 2002; 58:316-323.
16. Lawless JF. Statistical Models and Methods for Lifetime Data. Wiley: New York, 1982.