Cohesive gel naturally-shaped breast implants

Aesthetic Surgery Journal

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 63-64

  Sadove, Richard ^a  

^a NONE   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SILICONE;

ARTICLE; BREAST AUGMENTATION; BREAST ENDOPROSTHESIS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PATIENT SATISFACTION; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

EID: 0037529394     PISSN: 1090820X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1090-820X(03)90028-8     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Tebbetts JB.Achieving a predictable 24-hour return to normal activities after breast augmentation: Part II. Patient preparation, refined surgical techniques, and instrumentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;109:306-307.
2. Tebbetts JB. Dual plane breast augmentation: optimizing implant-soft-tissue relationships in a wide range of breast types. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001;107:1255-1272.
3. Tebbetts JB. The greatest myths in breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001;107:1895-1903.
4. Hidalgo D. Correcting/preventing common problems with saline breast augmentation. Panel discussion held at: The Aesthetic Meeting 2001; May 8, 2001; New York, NY.
5. Shons A. Breast cancer and augmentation mammaplasty: the preoperative consultation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;109:383-385.