|
|
Volumn 52, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 168-175
|
|
Ethical conflict associated with managed care: views of nurse practitioners.
a
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE;
ARTICLE;
ATTITUDE TO HEALTH;
BIOETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL ETHICS;
CONFLICT;
COOPERATION;
CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY;
EDUCATION;
EMPIRICAL APPROACH;
ETHICS;
FEMALE;
HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH;
HEALTH INSURANCE;
HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE;
HUMAN;
MALE;
MARKETING;
MEDICAL ETHICS;
NURSE ATTITUDE;
NURSE PRACTITIONER;
NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH;
ORGANIZATION;
ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT;
PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE;
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT;
PUBLIC RELATIONS;
QUESTIONNAIRE;
REGRESSION ANALYSIS;
UNITED STATES;
BIOETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL ETHICS;
EMPIRICAL APPROACH;
HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH;
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE;
ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL;
CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY);
COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR;
CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES;
ETHICS, NURSING;
FEMALE;
HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE;
HUMANS;
INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS;
MALE;
MANAGED CARE PROGRAMS;
MARKETING;
MARYLAND;
NURSE PRACTITIONERS;
NURSE'S ROLE;
NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH;
ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE;
PROFESSIONAL AUTONOMY;
QUESTIONNAIRES;
REGRESSION ANALYSIS;
|
|
EID: 0037526660
PISSN: 00296562
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1097/00006199-200305000-00006 Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (26)
|
|
References (0)
|
