Ionising radiation, environmental protection, and nuclear power

Nuclear Energy

Volumn 42, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 167-171

  Pentreath, R J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF READING   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Environment; Protection; Reference fauna and flora

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL RADIATION EFFECTS; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; IONIZING RADIATION; NUCLEAR INDUSTRY; RADIATION PROTECTION;

HUMAN RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION; REFERENCE FAUNA AND FLORA;

NUCLEAR ENERGY;

EID: 0037524256     PISSN: 01404067     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1680/nuen.42.3.167.37611     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. International Commission on Radiological Protection. Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP, 1977, ICRP Publication 26.
2. International Commission on Radiological Protection. Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP, 1991, ICRP Publication 60.
3. International Atomic Energy Agency. Ethical Considerations in Protecting the Environment from the Effects of Ionising Radiation. IAEA, Vienna, 2002, IAEA TECDOC-1270.
4. Pentreath R. J. Concepts, methods and models to assess environmental impact. In Radiological Protection of the Environment, the Path Forward to a New Policy? NEA/OECD, 2002, pp. 121-130.
5. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. Effects of Radiation on the Environment. UN, New York, 1996.
6. Pentreath R. J. A system for radiological protection of the environment: some initial thoughts and ideas. Journal of Radiological Protection, 1999, 19, 117-128.
7. Pentreath R. J. Radiological protection criteria for the natural environment. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 1998, 75, 175-179.
8. Pentreath R. J. Radiation protection of man and the environment: developing a common approach. Journal of Radiological Protection, 2002, 22, 45-56.
9. Pentreath R. J. and Woodhead D. S. A system for protecting the environment from ionising radiation: selecting reference fauna and flora, and the possible dose models and environmental geometries that could be applied to them. Science of the Total Environment, 2001, 277, 33-43.
10. International Commission on Radiological Protection. A report on progress towards new recommendations: a communication from the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Journal of Radiological Protection, 2001, 21, 113-123.
11. EC. Directive on the Conservation of Wild Birds. 79/409 EC, Brussels, 1979.
12. EC. Directive on the Conservation of Natural Habitats and of Wild Fauna and Flora. 92/43/EC, Brussels, 1992.
13. EC. Directive Establishing a Framework for Community action in the field of Water Policy. 2000/60/EC, Brussels, 2000.
14. Holm L. E. How could the systems for the radiological protection of the environment and man be integrated? In Radiological Protection of the Environment, the Path Forward to a New Policy? NEA/OECD, 2002, pp. 207-216.
15. Strand P., et al., Delivering a system and framework for the protection of the environment from ionizing radiation. Proceedings of the 10th International Congress of IRPA, Hiroshima, 14-19 May 2000, P-2a-116, 5 pp.
16. Strand P. and Larsson C. M. Delivering a framework for the protection of the environment from ionizing radiation. In Radioactive Pollutants, Impact on the Environment (F. Brechignac and B. J. Howard (eds). EDP Sciences, Les Ulis, Frances, 2001.
17. Pentreath R. J. Looking at the future of radioecology. Science, 2002, 298, 1333-1334.